Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crown Ambassador

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. AndyZ 22:03, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Crown Ambassador

WP:NOT a directory; this article is nothing but. More Amwaycruft. Paul 01:19, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per ^ Outriggr 01:43, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete with the rest of it, per nom. Fan1967 01:52, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Hobbeslover 01:52, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. joturn e r 02:20, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Bucketsofg✐ 02:22, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Funnybunny (^talk/_QRVS) 02:29, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Ter e nc e Ong 02:55, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Sorry Guy 05:40, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- even if it were not cruft, the article is a list, which the originator admits is "inexhaustive" -- Simon Cursitor 07:21, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. DarthVad e r 09:57, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Amway fans are sure active today. --Srik e it^{(talk ¦ ✉)} 11:22, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete along with all the other Amwaycruft. There's plenty of room in Amway for any details of note. ProhibitOnions 11:45, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.