- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 07:02, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
Non-notable, Vanity. A Google search for Jolt and the string "Girard Studios" gets 217 hits. However, only 2 are found when filtering out hits from the official site; both hits are from Wikipedia, and one is a redirect anyway. I prod tagged this about 5 days ago. Back then, there was also the statement "Formed by teenagers this movie studio is very up and coming". Crystal ball, anyone? An IP user recently removed the prod tag, that "up and coming" statement, as well as the following OR statement: " The number of movies that have come form them in the last little while has finally slowed to a halt because most of the cast, being teenagers, have finally gotten jobs.", but has not addressed the point that this does not seem to be known about at all outside the group itself. Drat (Talk) 04:36, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Non-notable indeed.Wickethewok 04:50, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. It's just kids playing with a camera. Eivind 05:10, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete nn.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 05:25, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per all above and WP:VSCA. Royboycrashfan
05:45, 3 March 2006 (UTC) Delete nn. --Siva1979Talk to me 09:54, 3 March 2006 (UTC)Changed to Keep. Let us give busted1der a chance to improve this article. --Siva1979Talk to me 16:06, 4 March 2006 (UTC)- Delete nn. --Terence Ong 11:04, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
- Contact the writer, give him a chance to make it relevant. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.8.170.184 (talk • contribs)
- Above user has only 3 edits, all of which have involved this article. Royboycrashfan 18:50, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as non-notable, probably WP:NFT, likely WP:VSCA. --Kinu t/c 19:22, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Krashlandon (e) 21:49, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
- Give me a chance to show that we are notable: The website and subsequent article are not WP:NFT, the information about the cast is from the videos. This is not self-promotion either. The page is lacking concrete proof and also a neutral point of view. Let me fix that and then we'll see, could anyone make any suggestions?--busted1der 22:25 3 March 2006
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.