Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/NeatCoronet458

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

NeatCoronet458

Final (0/3/0); ended 13:37, 27 February 2016 (UTC) per WP:SNOW Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 13:37, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination

NeatCoronet458 (talk · contribs) – YOUR DESCRIPTION OF THE USER NeatCoronet458 (talk) 12:53, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?

A: I would intend to fix a few edits in a few locked pages and fix some false pages which claim that the website they give you is the official one. I would also like to unlock some websites like The Pirate Bay onion website because I want to add it on The Pirate Bay article.

2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?

A:

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A: I have been in no conflicts with other users as I talk to them in a good manner and hear what they have to say and then explain to them if they have been doing something wrong or try learning from them if they were correct.

---

You may ask optional questions below. There is a limit of two questions per editor. Multi-part questions disguised as one question, with the intention of evading the limit, are disallowed. Follow-up questions relevant to questions you have already asked are allowed.

Discussion

• Links for NeatCoronet458: NeatCoronet458 (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
• Edit summary usage for NeatCoronet458 can be found here.

---

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review his contributions before commenting.

Support

Oppose

1. Oppose With only 71 edits, you're not prepared. Take a look at Wikipedia:Not now. only (talk) 13:24, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
2. Oppose (NOTNOW) No demonstrable editing or project experience. — xaosflux ^Talk 13:32, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
3. Oppose per WP:SNOW; fails my criteria. Chris Troutman (talk) 13:33, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Neutral

General comments

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.