User talk:163.167.129.124

List of state mottos

Hi! Thank you for your edits to the List of state mottos. Do you think you could provide a reference for the motto you listed for Italy? A Google search hardly provides any results and it isn't listed at Italy or it:Italia. It is Wikipedia policy that all statements be backed up by reliable sources. Thanks, Pruneau^talk 11:54, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wales

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in Wales. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you./wangi 14:34, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I fully support this comment. The practice of doing a double edit to prevent easy reversion is also devious--Snowded 15:33, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

moved from User talk:Wangi

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in Wales. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. What are your sources exactly as you do not state any? 163.167.129.124 14:50, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You what? Count them: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wales&curid=69894&action=history == 1 revert. Please stop putting the personal motto of the Prince of Wales as a motto of the country. Thanks/wangi 15:10, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AND your sources are..? As I mentioned above you do not cite any. Aside from corrections in layout, I edited the page twice and you have changed it back twice. I find your tone extremely unpleasant by the way. 163.167.129.124 15:22, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, count again - one revert. If indeed I had made two then a 3RR notice is still inappropriate and, guess what, that might account for my tone. Sources are not the issue — you are attempting to put the personal motto of an individual (the Prince of Wales) down as the motto of a country (Wales)... See the big difference? Thanks/wangi 15:25, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have undone my edit (twice) on two different pages and then threatened to block me from editing with the above "notice." Your unpleasant manner started before my reply in which I copied the message you originally sent me. 163.167.129.124 15:33, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I posted the 3RR warning on your talk page because it was appropriate - you have re-added that motto numerous times, see http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wales&curid=69894&action=history (three times, but using many edits - remember to use the preview button). WP:3RR is an official policy on the English Wikipedia, make that edit to Wales again and you will be blocked. It is important to discuss on an article talk page and gain consensus for controversial edits; constantly re-adding edits is not the way to do things. I reverted you once on Wales, the other reverts were by other editors. I cannot find any other article that I have reverted you on. Thanks/wangi 16:28, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have removed several user warning templates from your user or user talk page. These warnings are not put on your talk page to annoy you; they were placed here because other editors have noticed an issue with your behaviour that may require improvement. They are a method of communication and user talk pages stand as a record of communication with you. If you do not believe the warning was valid or have a question about improving your behaviour you can respond here or visit the help desk. If your talk page is becoming long, you can archive it in accordance with the guidelines laid out here How to archive a talk page. Thank you.

moved from User talk:Wangi, please reply here

Numerous times = twice, in both instances immediately reverted by you. Now I find your tone threatening and bullying. I am a new user and will make a formal complaint about this to an Administrator! 163.167.129.124 16:52, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As a new user might I recommend that spend some time having a read through some of the links that were posted at the top our your talk page. You seem to have a problem remembering what edits you have made to the Wales article - the page history is clear on the number of edits/reverts both yourself and I have made. I am a Wikipedia administrator, but of course you are free to ask the advice of another (as mentioned in the paragraph above which was added by another editor). Thanks/wangi 17:09, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to User:Wangi and User talk:Wangi

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Guinnog 17:02, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing content from your talk page

You have removed several user warning templates from your user or user talk page. These warnings are not put on your talk page to annoy you; they were placed here because other editors have noticed an issue with your behaviour that may require improvement. They are a method of communication and user talk pages stand as a record of communication with you. If you do not believe the warning was valid or have a question about improving your behaviour you can respond here or visit the help desk. If your talk page is becoming long, you can archive it in accordance with the guidelines laid out here How to archive a talk page. Thank you. Pruneau^talk 14:12, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

3RR vio

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from editing. Further more, please discuss throughly with other editors before ou revert. -Penwhale | Blast the Penwhale 14:40, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.