Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joshuah michael
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 10:32, 3 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 10:32, 3 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy deleted by User:Tone as a copyright violation. Non-admin closure Hut 8.5 10:46, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Joshuah michael (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Notability cannot be verified. Most references given either don't work or link to someone else's information. Only remaining links are Myspace (remember, WP:YMINAR) and his own web site. Google hits are few and far between. I smell a hoax here, though I could be wrong. Realkyhick 05:57, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Wikipedia isn't for things made up in school one day. GreenJoe 06:16, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Vanity, non-notable musician. Keb25 06:21, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Page is a blatant copyvio of [1]. It was a copyvio of his myspace page at [2] but the text has suddenly been removed from the myspace (still exists in Google cache though - [3]). The sole contributor also has a very similar username to the article title and has a nasty habit of removing CSD tags. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.194.205.40 (talk) 07:11, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete For either copyvio or WP:CSD#A7. The google cache observation makes a pretty compelling case for it not being copyvio, but rather self-promotional spam. (I've asked him to clarify that on his talk page, btw). --Mud4t 07:55, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.