Talk:Tumbler Ridge

Tumbler Ridge is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on November 12, 2011.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 7, 2008	Featured article candidate	Promoted

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Canada: British Columbia / Communities Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian communities.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Mining Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Organized Labour Low‑importance

	Organized Labour portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Coordinates

BIG PROBLEM: Hi I am user:Ichmichi from Wikipedia.de. I recognized a mistake in the geographical data of the object described in the article. Please correct the placement data of the object. I found it in Russia (!) near to the "Baikal Sea"! --80.138.69.1 01:16, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I investigated, here is what I found (give or take a few degrees):

Location	Coordinate
Tumbler Ridge	55°06′N, 120°58′W
Russia (near Lake Baikal)	55°06′N, 120°58′E

The coordinates in the article are sending me here and here which is correct. maclean 04:13, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, so it's correct that it's placed in Russia? Then sorry for disturbing... I didnt read the article, I was just surfing around in Google Earth being surprised to find something with "British Columbia" in its name in Russia..... signed Ichmichi --84.60.223.145 01:11, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 23:25, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tumbler Ridge, British Columbia → Tumbler Ridge – Name is unique as town name, no secondary uses exist other than the airport and two schools, all located here, target is redirect to current title. Canadian disambiguation rules per CANSTYLE say unique town/city names take no disambiguation Skookum1 (talk) 04:22, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support. WP:UNDAB clearly applies here. —seav (talk) 00:24, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Linking in Infoboxes

I have noticed the removal of the link to District municipality. I understand it was done in good faith, however this style of wikilink was well received in the consensus-built approach to settlement types in infoboxes of Ontario municipalities (see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ontario/Archive 1 section 83), and I see no reason why it should not also apply to BC. The Easter Egg problem is important in wikipedia, but I do not see how this is an easter egg, it links exactly to what it states it should link to. Mattximus (talk) 14:35, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This link is quite similar to the "confederation" example given at WP:EASTEREGG: you would expect it to link to the article district municipality, as opposed to a much more specific article. Actually, since the article District municipality actually includes the list currently being linked to, linking to district municipality would seem to be the best way to resolve this; I have implemented that. Nikkimaria (talk) 14:44, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I won't revert lest starting an edit war, but it seems strange to link to district municipality, which is just a stub and talks about Ontario and South Africa instead of the more appropriate District municipalities in British Columbia which is specific to the context. Mattximus (talk) 21:03, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is no article District municipalities in British Columbia - that's a redirect to the list. Of course District municipality could be further improved to make it less stubby. Nikkimaria (talk) 21:32, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

But you would rather the stub that doesn't really have to do with the municipality in question than the article specifically dedicated to British Columbia? Mattximus (talk) 21:44, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The stub has a section specifically dedicated to British Columbia, which could be expanded; the other article is primarily a list. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:40, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Tumbler Ridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:14, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Tumbler Ridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:52, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Tumbler Ridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:33, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tumbler Ridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061116045952/http://www.dawsoncreek.ca/documents/southpeaceprofile.pdf to http://dawsoncreek.ca/documents/southpeaceprofile.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:23, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FA in need of review

This older Featured Article needs work to rise to current FA criteria. Issues:

there are several uncited paragraphs ("History", "Infraestructure", "Culture, recreation and media", "Government and politics");
the "Demographics" section needs to be updated to the most recent census;
the "Economy" section needs updating;
the lead is confusing, it goes from mining issues to dinosaur prints to mining issues; there's also too much detail about mining in the lead;
From the lead: I can't find the "projected population of 10,000 people" or the "weakening Asian markets" anywhere in the body of the article.

These are just examples. RetiredDuke (talk) 22:51, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have updated the article, added some additional citations and references, and did some miscellaneous fixes overall. [1] The "10,000 people" and "Asian markets" bits from the lead are summarizations from the Demographics section and the History and Economy sections. If there is anything further relative to the FA criteria, just list it here. Thanks. maclean (talk) 04:39, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@RetiredDuke and Maclean25: does the article meet the featured article criteria? If so, can you remove its notice from WP:FARGIVEN and mark it as "Satisfactory" at WP:URFA/2020A? If not, can you outline your concerns below? Thanks Z1720 (talk) 02:10, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]