Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Baku Ibne, et al./Proposed decision

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Fred Bauder (talk | contribs) at 02:58, 12 March 2005 (Proposed remedies). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

all proposed

Arbitrators should vote for or against each point or abstain.

  • Only items that receive a majority "support" vote will be passed.
  • Items that receive a majority "oppose" vote will be formally rejected.
  • Items that do not receive a majority "support" or "oppose" vote will be open to possible amendment by any Arbitrator if he so chooses. After the amendment process is complete, the item will be voted on one last time.

Conditional votes for or against and abstentions should be explained by the Arbitrator before or after his/her time-stamped signature. For example, an Arbitrator can state that she/he would only favor a particular remedy based on whether or not another remedy/remedies were passed.

On this case, 0 Arbitrators are recused and 1] is inactive, so 6 votes are a majority.

For all items

Proposed wording to be modified by Arbitrators and then voted on.

Motions and requests by the parties

Place those on the discussion page.

Proposed temporary injunctions

Four net "support" votes needed to pass (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support")
24 hours from the first vote is normally the fastest an injunction will be imposed.

Template

1) {text of proposed orders}

Support:
Oppose:
Abstain:


Proposed final decision

Proposed principles

Template

1) {text of proposed principle}

Support:
Oppose:
Abstain:

Proposed findings of fact

Template

1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:
Oppose:
Abstain:

Proposed remedies

Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.

Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:
Oppose:
Abstain:

Vandalism and POV editing by 84.154.xxx.xxx

1) An anonymous editor from ip 84.154.xxx.xxx has made number of POV and vandalizing edits to Safavids, [1], [2], [3], emphasis on dance, using the word "Twinlkletoes", [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]; other vandalizing edits are on Tabib's talk page or refer to Tabib, [11], [12], [13], [14], [15]

Support:
  1. Fred Bauder 02:58, Mar 12, 2005 (UTC)
Oppose:
Abstain:

Tibib fights vandalism

2. Tabib attempted to fight this vandalism and expressed his frustration, [16], "Will somebody STOP this ongoing VANDALISM? Why I should fight all those lunatics ALONE???"

Support:
  1. Fred Bauder 02:58, Mar 12, 2005 (UTC)
Oppose:
Abstain:

Anon creates account "LIGerasimova"

3. An edit by 84.154.xxx.xxx, specifically 84.154.123.111 made February 9, 2005 was signed with the name, "L. I. GERASIMOVA" [17], later signing it with the first edit of User:LIGerasimova, [18]. User contributions For LIGerasimova, [

Support:
  1. Fred Bauder 02:58, Mar 12, 2005 (UTC)
Oppose:
Abstain:

Proposed enforcement

Template

1) {text of proposed enforcement}

Support:
Oppose:
Abstain:

Discussion by Arbitrators

General

Motion to close

Four net "support" votes needed to close case (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support")
24 hours from the first motion is normally the fastest a case will close.