Talk:Sea monster
This article is listed on votes for deletion on the grounds that is unencyclopedic. Pete 14:07 10 Jul 2003 (UTC)
Evercat is reverting my work. He doesnt explain why. Pizza Puzzle
- Pizza Puzzle is adding junk about aliens and radioactive dinosaurs. He doesn't explain why. Evercat 14:31 10 Jul 2003 (UTC)
Evercat obviously hasnt seen the 20 Japanese films about the radioactive dinsosaur that lives in the sea. Pizza Puzzle
- Make a distinction between fiction and reality, please. Real accounts of "sea monsters" have little to do with radioactive aliens, etc. Evercat 14:35 10 Jul 2003 (UTC)
- Agreed, the radioactive mutants thing should definitely be explained in context. As it is, the article looks like User:Harry Potter wrote most of it. -- Wapcaplet 14:40 10 Jul 2003 (UTC)
- It shows Evercat doesnt really know much about this subject (he only wants to force his POV that sea monsters aren't at all "magical" or "supernatural") since he listed the Kraken and Cadborosaurus under "Probably Fictional Sea Monsters" when, in fact, they are both more or less accepted as being real.
- His insistence that a reference to dinosaurs etc should be removed is also an example of his forcing his POV - the single most common theory regarding sea monsters - a theory gaining acceptance amongst cryptozoologists - is that creatures once believed to be extinct still exist (or have existed within recent history).
- He isnt trying to edit, improve, or NPOV my additions - he is simply trying to censor and delete them because he finds them "silly" -- in so doing he is not only deleting my additions - he has also deleted work of others and work which he has still made no argument against - in short, he is being irresponsible