Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheg
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 17:03, 3 March 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete (already BJAODNed). Mindspillage (spill yours?) 04:23, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
which came first: patent nonsense or the hoax? Nateji77 14:05, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete sometimes, when I'm very drunk, I find this kinda thing funny--Sophitus 15:19, May 31, 2005 (UTC)
- BJAODN. Could've been speedied, but now that it has made it to vfd, it should be preserved for all time. -- BD2412 talk 17:14, 2005 May 31 (UTC)
- Patent nonsense, belongs to BJAODN. Delete. - Mike Rosoft 19:24, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete but add to BJAODN. --Idont Havaname 20:48, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- BJAODN. JamesBurns 09:44, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete drini ☎ 17:17, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- It's funny but this isn't the place for it. DeleteCelestianpower 17:19, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Donnabomb-I know where this all began. the two people who created it are friends. They have thought long and hard over this. Leave it up. It is also well written and informative. Maybe losing a bit of grammatical correctness near the end
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.