User talk:EnsRedShirt

This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 30 days are automatically archived to User talk:EnsRedShirt/Archive 1. Sections without timestamps are not archived.

Heroes (TV series)

Thanks for stopping a potential revert war about that dumb "Goldmember" connection. Yours was the best solution. Primogen 07:11, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pilgrim18 - why did you erase what i typed? It follows perfectly in the story. You deleted information not yet presented on the page.

To Be completely honest? It's pure Speculation and not shown at all in the show, especially in Distractions where at least one of those two items is directly contradicted, when Benett is thrown across the room telepathicaly by Sylar. EnsRedShirt 23:01, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Producers of The 1 Second Film

I believe that a link to the IMDb page for Producers of The 1 Second Film would be appropriate on the Wikipedia page for that film, as it proves exactly what the article is claiming -- that IMDb does not list all the producers individually. See Producers of the 1 Second Film at IMDb. --Metropolitan90 04:26, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But anyone could put that up.. A link to a notification on the 1Second film website announcing it would be better, no? EnsRedShirt 04:30, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If that's a concern, I suggest we list both sources, which I will put into the article. --Metropolitan90 09:12, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mobile ESPN

That works for me.--CastAStone|^(talk) 19:34, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted the first time more out of not wanting the article to be factually inacurate rather then the fact you changed it. EnsRedShirt 19:35, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Myers

I suspect this was his intended joke. -- Jim Douglas ^(talk) _(contribs) 07:57, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That was my thought as well at first, but none of the dates add up, and other then Myers being Canadian I don't see a connection. EnsRedShirt 08:05, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

School

Looks good to me! It'll look even better with a school infobox, and a couple more references. But even as it is, it's pretty solid. Nice job. :) --El on ka 11:58, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stargate

I'd just like to mention I have nothing against you, most of my comments are aimed at Matt who has unfortunately gotten under my skin by simply posting one link replies to rules or suggestions that have little relevance to what is at hand and has generally taken a holier than thou attitude to the whole thing. I have nothing against you though, sorry if I have caused you any offence. I'm wondering if this mediation thing you mentioned is the only way forward. --Zikar 22:01, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If it does go its not going to turn out the way you like, as more than likely the mediators will agree that this doesn't belong in the article. EnsRedShirt 00:01, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User page

Thanks for the revert. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 13:09, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your welcome, I hope I didn't over step my bounds.. :) EnsRedShirt 13:12, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No nota t all. It's quite common to revert and sometimes others will make corrections. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 16:33, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Speculation"

Just so you know, I would call it speculation also, but the first four were correct, and it correctly included a very unlikely team. --TeckWiz ^ParlateContribs_@ 02:18, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speculation is speculation, is speculation.. It won't be verified by the production crew and as such does not have a place on wikipedia. EnsRedShirt 02:20, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But if the first, let's say 8 teams are correct, you still would call it speculation? --TeckWiz ^ParlateContribs_@ 02:22, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]