User talk:WJetChao
Welcome to Wikipedia!!!
|
NPOV
It would help if you actually wrote what your NPOV concerns are with all these articles. I'm sure that most of your NPOV tags will be reverted unless you provide explanation on the respective talk pages. Gdo01 00:23, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Which is funny, because I was just coming over here to tell him I had reverted his NPOV tag on the John Doe article because there was no explanation on the talk page. Jet, I invite you to put it back if you really feel it needs worked on, but you do need to discuss it on the talk page as well. Tell us what you feel is wrong! --Reverend Loki 17:56, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Invitation
Hello! I saw your edits to Transwoman and would like to invite you to join WikiProject LGBT studies. We'd be dleighted to have you! Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 11:00, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hi, WJetChao, welcome to WikiProject LGBT Studies! We are a growing community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to identifying, categorizing, and improving articles of interest to the LGBT community. Some points that may be helpful:
If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the talk page, and we will be happy to help you. And once again - Welcome! |
:) Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 01:19, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Request for adminship
I want to be an administrator because I get the privileges and I can do something else. I need help for adminship please!. Jet123 20:37, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- Jet, in order to become an administrator, you will need a great deal more edits, to get to know policy and procedures within wikipedia, and then go through the process of requesting to become an administrator, where your work and activity will be evaluated by other users within wikipedia. See WP:RFA for more insight. --Kukini hablame aqui 02:40, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- And specifically read through Wikipedia:Guide to requests for adminship and Wikipedia:Administrator's reading list. Those should answer your questions. - Taxman Talk 12:13, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi Jet, I have now closed your request for adminship per our snowball claude. Your request was clearly not going to pass and no new comments were being made by those who were in opposition. Further to the advice given by Taxman and hablame aqui, I would suggest answering the questions in a much more thorough manner next time you make a request for adminship - obviously I would also recommend gaining a suitable amount of experience in the interim. I will be more than happy to answer any questions that you may have. Yours, Rje 12:25, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
- It is standard procedure to close requests that are clearly going to fail, see WP:SNOW. In order to pass, your RfA would have required 40 unopposed support votes from the point that I closed it; there was no chance of this happening because, as you experienced, candidates with under 1000 edits tend to be opposed out of hand. Requests from what are perceived to be under-qualified candidates tend to culminate in "pile-ons". We close such RfAs before the pile-on occurs because it is of no benefit to anyone, least of all the candidate. I hope you find this useful. Rje 11:46, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Adminship
You should not try to become an Admin. without knowing what it entails. You need a large amount of experience with the technical and policy-oriented elements of Wikipedia. Michael 19:07, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Cleanup user page
I want to cleanup my user page. It is a mess. I will need some volunteer to edit my user page please. Jet123 04:49, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
- I took a shot at it. What do you think? —EncMstr 04:46, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
MedCom Nomination
Per the two oppose rule, your nomination to the Mediation Committee has been declined. Your nomination has been delisted and archived here. Please note that a new policy was recently enacted in which a user cannot reapply within 3 months of their last declined nomination. However, we recommend that you take this opportunity to use the comments made at your nomination to improve yourself not only as a potential mediator, but as an editor of Wikipedia in general. Thanks again for your interest.
- On behalf of the Mediation Committee, ^demon[omg plz] 22:48, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Adminship
Hi Jet, there are no rules governing when you may or may not run for adminship again. However, I would urge you to wait at least a couple of months as you will not pass if you run at this stage: no candidate has ever been promoted with your edit count or length of editing time. Further to this, running twice in your first six weeks may prejudice any future RfA (some people do oppose candidates they perceive to be too "eager", not that I agree with this myself). Generally speaking candidates with under 1000 edits and three months of editing time will be rejected out of hand at RfA, and most successful candidates have significantly higher totals than these. You might also want to read Wikipedia:Guide to requests for adminship for further information about the process. Yours, Rje 13:01, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
User page editing
I got help from User:Sango123 in developing my user page and talk page. You might want to message Sango or some of those that are in ongoing contact with page designing. best, --Kukini hablame aqui 23:33, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
Re: Edit user page
I want a user almost same as yours. Keep the content the same but put the portal on my user page ok. Jet123 23:55, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
- Do you mean my userpage? I would like to redesign your userpage; however, I am also having a slight difficulty when it comes to some Wikitext. I am not a renovator; I do anti-vandalism. If you need someone to renovate your userpage for you, please add your name to the renovatees section in Wikipedia:WikiProject User Page Help/Trading Spaces. Cheers! — zero » 02:39, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
LGBT WikiProject Newsletter
LGBT WikiProject newsletter
The LGBT studies WikiProject Newsletter | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SatyrBot 05:09, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Willin to Adopt u..=]
Im willing to adopt u..=]Pretty Ricky aint breakin up yall! yay!! Tam` Tam` =] 02:30, 4 April 2007 (UTC)