Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Alexlot
- Suspected sockpuppeteer
Alexlot (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Suspected sockpuppets
Camelot31 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
Alanmk (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
Pegasus76 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
87.17.210.177 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
(a reverse DNS lookup resolves this IP to a dynamic address range registered to retail.telecomitalia.it )
- Report submission by
Kralizec! (talk) 19:14, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
- Evidence
In reviewing my watchlist, I noticed an apparent pattern of unusually rapid and very focused edits by a small set of users to several related articles. All four accounts (plus one anonymous IP address) appear to be single purpose accounts and/or sock puppets with a modus operandi of removing [1] [2] [3] [4] and/or replacing [5] legitimate links with spam links to the http://www.alinti.it website [6] [7] [8] [9]. Additionally, as Seven Wonders of the World is watched very closely for spam and vandalism, it seems that a new sock -Pegasus76- was registered, immediately used to fix [10] the previous sock's incomplete link deletion, performed an obvious act of vandalism [11] (by deleting two-thirds of the See also section), and was then immediately reverted [12] by the original IP address -87.17.210.177- ... which was enough to obfuscate all the previous edits from casual watchlist observation or recent-changes patrol.
- Comments
The accused sockpuppeteer has now accused me of vandalism [13]. --Kralizec! (talk) 13:24, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
please don't cry!!!i have only written "who is the vandal". you have poster a external link with 4 lines e some advertising banner, against the wiki policy. I have posted a external link that it has been cancels 4 March without any reason after several weeks in "seven wonders" voice, weeks during which it was not vandalism. So not to make the victim.
I still waiting for an answer about what i have written.Alexlot 08:13, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
Alexlot 15:21, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
- Conclusions