Jump to content

Talk:Frances Alda

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 17:42, 7 February 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 4 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 4 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Opera}}, {{WikiProject Biography}}, {{WikiProject New Zealand}}, {{WikiProject Women music}}. Remove 1 deprecated parameter: auto.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Comment

[edit]

More info at Find-A-Grave. Lincher 18:40, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism on article history page

[edit]

In one of the edit summaries, not sure how to fix it. Ernest the Sheep (talk) 05:16, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think it just stays there. It's the history, after all, of all edits. --Kleinzach 07:50, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. The vandal is you. You go around changing articles about New Zealanders to turn them into Australians. Frances Alda was born in New Zealand, and there is no record of her ever being an Australian. Jessica Watson, for example has two New Zealand parents, has a New Zealand passport, but was born in Australia. Therefore she IS an Australian, just as Frances Alda WAS a New Zealander. Wallie (talk) 08:47, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A New Zealander

[edit]

Why is it that many articles with people born in New Zealand are suddenly changed to being "Australian". In this case, this article says that she is a New Zealander in all languages other than the English one. It does have to be said that a certain person does go around changing articles in this way, and then calls people who change them back "vandals". (see above) Wallie (talk) 05:09, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In my edit Frances Alda is described as being New Zealand/Australian, which I would suggest is a fair compromise based on the facts. If you have any other information that would imply otherwise feel free to present it. As for the other articles in different languages you refer to, I would suggest they are based on previous versions of the English article, or other slightly biased articles such as the one on the nzedge website mentioned in external links. Ernest the Sheep (talk) 09:55, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No. Alda is widely known as a New Zealander only. She does not even have any Australian relatives! It is like calling Jessica Watson a New Zealander, or an Australian/New Zealander. Jessica continues to hold a New Zealand passport and nearly all her relatives are New Zealanders. However, she states she is 100 percent Australian and New Zealanders accept that. In the same way, Frances Alda always said she was a New Zealander.
You seem to have something against New Zealand. Unfortunately by being persistant like you are, the truth is often distorted.
As far as the non English language articles are concerned, they are in no way biased. The NZedge articles are written in English anyway. Wallie (talk) 09:57, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I don't quite follow -what is your point? The description of Alda as being New Zealand/Australian would appear to be an accurate reflection on her life story, she did only live in NZ to the age of one (it could even be argued that she was NZ/AUS/USA as I believe she later become a US citizen). If you have evidence that would suggest that she should be referred to as a NZer only, then feel free to present it here. The New Zealand/Australian description is supported in the links provided at the end of the main article. Ernest the Sheep (talk) 21:15, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If she moved to Australia at the age of one and lived there most of her life, standard practice here on Wikipedia seems to be to call her New Zealander-Australian, or New Zealand born Australian. Changing something like that backwards and forwards constitutes an edit war if it occurs more than three times in 24 hours, but it is not vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Vandalism is inserting completely unrelated nonsense into an article (gibberish or obscenities), not something you happen to disagree with. You have no authority to call him a vandal, regardless of how much you disagree with him. Mike Hayes (talk) 22:32, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Frances Alda. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:36, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cerebral hemorrage = stroke

[edit]

From the article: She died of a stroke (some sources cite cerebral hemorrhage). A cerebral hemorrage is a type of stroke, so I don't think the text in parentheses is needed. We should say either "she died of a stroke" or "she died of a cerebral hemorrage" but no need to say both. I've revised it.

From Wikipedia: "Intracerebral bleeds are the second most common cause of stroke" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intracerebral_hemorrhage#Causes

From WebMD: "A brain hemorrhage is a type of stroke" https://www.webmd.com/brain/brain-hemorrhage-bleeding-causes-symptoms-treatments#1

Omc (talk) 15:48, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]