User talk:Yoshi24517
This is Yoshi24517's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11Auto-archiving period: 7 days |
Yoshi24517 is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated. |
Please note: I live on the West Coast of the United States. I may not see your message due to time zones. In which case, I will respond as soon as I can. Thanks!
Current time at my location: 7:40 pm, November 13, 2024 PST [refresh]
Please remember to stay civil when contacting me, otherwise your message may be ignored and reverted. As a gentle reminder to experienced editors contacting me, please remember WP:DTTR. I know about the opposite part of this essay, but as such, I prefer to not be templated. Thanks.
- If you came here because I reverted your unsourced change, please cite your sources in the page or article you edited, bringing them here doesn't help very much.
- Please place new messages at the bottom of the page. To start a new section, click the New section/Add topic button at the top of the page.
All sections are automatically archived by a bot (Lowercase sigmabot III) automatically after 7 days of inactivity.
Current Status: Very Busy
-Status updated as of Thursday, November 14, 2024 at 03:40 UTC.
60s
Please mind your language. I believe it is not wrong at all at what I did. In fact, if I had my way, I would reedit all the years. You guys say 1001-2000 is the 2nd millennium and 1901-2000 is the 20th century. Then why do we need to make things inconsistent by adding a pop-culture created decade in the form of 1960-1969 when it is actually 1961-1970. 136.54.56.86 (talk) 17:12, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- Because 1960s is anything that is 196X, hence the 60s. 1970 doesn't belong there, does it? Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 20:13, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- Your argument is completely based on pop culture hogwash and not at all convincing. When we say 16th century or even 1500s, people still say 1501-1600. 136.54.56.86 (talk) 20:28, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – February 2024
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2024).
- An RfC about increasing the inactivity requirement for Interface administrators is open for feedback.
- Pages that use the JSON contentmodel will now use tabs instead of spaces for auto-indentation. This will significantly reduce the page size. (T326065)
- Following a motion, the Arbitration Committee adopted a new enforcement restriction on January 4, 2024, wherein the Committee may apply the 'Reliable source consensus-required restriction' to specified topic areas.
- Community feedback is requested for a draft to replace the "Information for administrators processing requests" section at WP:AE.
- Voting in the 2024 Steward elections will begin on 06 February 2024, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 27 February 2024, 14:00 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
- A vote to ratify the charter for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is open till 2 February 2024, 23:59:59 (UTC) via Secure Poll. All eligible voters within the Wikimedia community have the opportunity to either support or oppose the adoption of the U4C Charter and share their reasons. The details of the voting process and voter eligibility can be found here.
- Community Tech has made some preliminary decisions about the future of the Community Wishlist Survey. In summary, they aim to develop a new, continuous intake system for community technical requests that improves prioritization, resource allocation, and communication regarding wishes. Read more
- The Unreferenced articles backlog drive is happening in February 2024 to reduce the backlog of articles tagged with {{Unreferenced}}. You can help reduce the backlog by adding citations to these articles. Sign up to participate!
a user you have warned
carries on vandalizing: The user name is Helloguyamigos. --2003:6:33AE:3D55:29DC:E859:2ED3:80BF (talk) 06:24, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
hey sorry about the Dans Mon Esprit Tout Divague is it ok if i add real info
sorry Hjhgbnuhvbyhbn (talk) 21:54, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Reply to your post on my talkpage:
You wrote that I removed content without adequately explaining why and then explained how to use the edit summary, but I did write something in that summary, I wrote this: "This is in the infobox and completely pointless to have in the lead section" What's inadequate about that? The information removed was just a post code and area code which is completely unnecessary to have in the lead section. That information is also in the side infobox so why duplicate it? 86.8.114.154 (talk) 23:01, 7 February 2024 (UTC)