Talk:Aspergillosis

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Veterinary medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Veterinary medicine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Veterinary medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Veterinary medicineTemplate:WikiProject Veterinary medicineVeterinary medicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fungi Low‑importance

	Fungi portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fungi, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fungi on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FungiWikipedia:WikiProject FungiTemplate:WikiProject FungiFungi articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine: Dermatology Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Dermatology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Aspergillosis.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

dogs?

what does aspergillosis have to do with dogs? ive had it, and i know birds can get it but even the article says nothing about the susceptibility of dogs. badmachine (talk) 08:13, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Aspergillosis can be lethal in dogs. Most at risk are the long nosed breeds. It infects the nasal passages and causes the outside of the nose to necrotise. (IE the usually wet, outside part goes dry and is merely a dead shell encasing the disease.) The inside of the nose goes red and swollen and can protrude slightly outwards. Very hard to cure at this stage and if untreated the disease can spread to the brain etc.. Dog needs to be aneathetized and the infected parts packed in antifungal ointment for some hours (lamisil is sometimes used here). This process needs to be repeated several times. Ketoconazole and itraconozole tablets havve been used but even after months of treatment have sometimes had little effect. It is also hard to get diagnosis from vets. Biopsy can lead to mistakes and have the vet declare that they dont know the cause. Few vets can recognise this disease from first presentation. One tip I can give you to point you the way to diagnosis is to apply some , off the counter, antifungal to the outside of the nose (Canesten cream which is used for Thrush and althletes foot is good and will do absolutely no harm.). This causes the thin, necrotised, outside of the nose to turn to slime and shed. (dont be alarmed at this it shows the disease is being attacked). It is critical to survival that this disease is dealt with as quickly as possible. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.22.171.60 (talk) 07:52, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Incubation period of hours

Is it possible that the onset of Aspergillosis symptoms, including necrosis, will be withing hours of infection? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.80.130.234 (talk) 21:38, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Revamp

Over coming weeks I'm going to attempt to revamp and expand this article. I might potentially split it into subtypes i.e. ABPA, invasive, sub-acute (chronic necrotizing) etc. There's a lot of good literature around to expand this quite significantly. Any help is appreciated! --—Cyclonenim | Chat 10:15, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I propose we structure under the following terminologies, as these are the most clear descriptive terms used in literature:

Types of infection

-Colonisation

--Asymptomatic colonisation

--Superficial colonisation

-Cutaneous infection (eg otitis externa)

-Allergic

--Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA)

--Severe asthma and fungal sensitisation (SAFS)

--Fungal sinusitis

-Chronic

--Aspergilloma

--Chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA)

--Chronic cavitary pulmonary aspergillosis (CCPA)

--Semi-invasive

-Invasive aspergillosis

--Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis

--Tracheobronchitis

--Acute invasive rhinosinusitis

--Cerebral aspergillosis

--Endocarditis

Other rare infections (e.g. pleural)

--—Cyclonenim | Chat 11:20, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cyclonenim, I have several sources (textbooks) which discuss asperigllosis of the paranasal sinuses and oropharynx. If you wish I can generate some content on this below. Lesion (talk) 15:38, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, that'd be great. These would come under invasive aspergillosis; I am currently undecided on whether to split the article into the separate subtypes or not. Maybe we should collate everything as much as possible here, and move later if necessary? --—Cyclonenim | Chat 10:12, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aspergillosis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:57, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aspergillosis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081207081944/http://www.mycology.adelaide.edu.au/Mycoses/Opportunistic/Aspergillosis/ to http://www.mycology.adelaide.edu.au/Mycoses/Opportunistic/Aspergillosis/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:35, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gardening fungicides and resistance to antifungals

https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/11/when-tulips-kill/574489/ (compounds used to protect tulip cultivation increasing resistance and thereby increasing difficulty of treating aspergillosis)

Construction & renovation work in hospitals

Construction & renovation activities in hospitals may cause fungal outbreaks and especially of Aspergillus spp. The risk is increased on fragile patients such as the immunocompromised. Reference: https://sf2h.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/SF2H-SFMM_fungal-infections-guidelines-2011.pdf 84.205.241.2 (talk) 21:40, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Green fungus" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Green fungus. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 24#Green fungus until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:15, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]