User talk:139.216.189.7

THE ONLY USER THAT SHOULD BE TREATED LIKE A KING. I MAKE FINAL JUDGEMENTS, YOU PLEBS CAVE IN.

Daryl Hannah is a dumbass.

August 2018

Hello, I'm Gilliam. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Mike Ness have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 23:43, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Mike Ness. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 03:55, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mike Ness, you may be blocked from editing. 2601:1C0:4401:24A0:F0A6:D2C4:275E:9E1A (talk) 03:56, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

The edits I made about Mike Ness are factual and of a non-harrassing nature and should be delared as fact

October 2018

Please refrain from attempting to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been disallowed by an edit filter. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Materialscientist (talk) 05:44, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

Please refrain from attempting to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been disallowed by an edit filter. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Materialscientist (talk) 10:45, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. DMacks (talk) 04:31, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments: Blocked for 1 year.

March 2021

Hello, I'm Cassiopeia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Jay Hernandez, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Cassiopeia^(talk) 06:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at George Takei. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: George Takei was changed by 139.216.189.7 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.908228 on 2021-03-06T06:34:14+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:34, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. Connormah (talk) 07:39, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments: Blocked for 1 year.

George Takei deserves all the negative criticism he gets.

May 2023

Hello, I'm Moons of Io. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Bartholomew I of Constantinople have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Moons of Io (talk) 01:43, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But he is a heretic. Everything about his heresies can be proven by searching up Youtube 139.216.189.7 (talk) 02:55, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2023

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:Materialscientist. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Technopat (talk) 14:38, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

139.216.189.7 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Preotected user and is exempt from banning

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Your reasoning that you are exempt from being able to be blocked is inaccurate and an inadequate reason to unblock you. Aoidh (talk) 05:13, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Arthur EnGoron is a lizard. Not qualified to be considered a human. Lower than a rodent. 139.216.189.7 (talk) 03:59, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A reminder that Arthur Engoron is going to have a very unpleasant next few years and few will be crying for his decline. His groomer behaviour will be leaked in the next few months 139.216.189.7 (talk) 04:01, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.