Hi, thanks for your edits, but I'm afraid I've had to remove the images you've uploaded. Please could you read the fair-use policy. We only use images under fair use in certain specific situations, and pictures of consumer electronics devices don't fall under it. — Matt Crypto19:18, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please listen to the other editors. To claim fair use on images you have to justify why you think you can claim fair use. On the "Digital audio player" article we have free images, so not only are the fair use images not needed, they cannot be justified. See Help:Image page#Fair use rationale. AlistairMcMillan20:39, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is a copyrighted image that has been released by a company or organization to promote their work or product in the media, such as advertising material or a promotional photo in a press kit.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pgdn963 (talk • contribs) 20:52, April 15, 2007 (UTC)
i already told you. This is a copyrighted image that has been released by a company or organization to promote their work or product in the media, such as advertising material or a promotional photo in a press kit.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pgdn963 (talk • contribs) 20:52, April 15, 2007 (UTC)
I ALREADY TOLD YOU. This is Press release Image by company. If is unconvincing, ask to company. OK? if they do not permit this image use. then i will obey you. OK? show me. company's Official answer. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pgdn963 (talk • contribs) 20:55, April 15, 2007 (UTC)
That's nice. But where did YOU find it? Did it come from their website, from a review on another website, from Flickr? Where. Please give us the exact URL where you found the image. If you don't the image will be deleted. AlistairMcMillan20:57, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
sorry, BUT YOU ARE WRONG. check uploaded image. then you will find 'image from xxxxxxx http://xxxxxx' OK?
I ALREADY Recorded "where is this image come from". ~
YOU WILL FIND 'WHERE THIS IMAGE COME FROM'! I"M REALLY TIRED.
The onus to prove that an image's owner has given permission for Wikipedia-compatible licensing is on you, not on other Wikipedia editors. Also, please be civil to others. Thank you. Dppowell21:06, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is a copyrighted image that has been released by a company or organization to promote their work or product in the media, such as advertising material or a promotional photo in a press kit.OK? can you understand wiki rule?Pgdn963
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the external links you added to the page Iriver do not comply with our guidelines for external links. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Natalie02:45, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to iriver. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policy for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Thank you. Natalie02:51, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is NOT promotional. Someone may want this information.. and this hide URL is not AD BANEER. and According to wiki rule. there is NO rule 'no english URL must remove'. and i already told you this is NOT promotional. and that HIDE LINK is NOT shopping site and DO NOT SELL other country. bcz, that link product is PROTOTYPE. not product. didn't you know CES2007?)
and i read this, too. WP:EL#Foreign-language_links ok. see. 1. Links should be kept to a minimum. A lack of external links, or a small number of external links is not a reason to add external links. <- N/A
2. Rather than creating a long list of external links, editors should consider linking to a related category in the Open Directory Project (also known as) that is devoted to creating relevant directories of links pertaining to various topics. If there is no relevant category, you can request help finding or creating a category by placing on the article's talk page. <- N/A
3. Try to avoid linking to multiple pages from the same website; instead, try to find an appropriate linking page within the site. <- N/A
no problem.
Exactly, external links should be kept to a minimum. Adding seven links to the same site is unecessary and there is no reason to have a link to a non English site. Natalie03:31, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
then, you must reduce Link. why do you DELETE ALL LINK? stop vandalism. if you continue vandalism.(remove all link) then, i will report admin.
I don't see anything wrong with linking to iriver's presentation at CES, the industry's biggest trade show. New contributors are our most valuable resource. We must treat newcomers with kindness and patience. Yakuman (数え役満)03:32, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Absolutery Right.
I'm not intending to bite, although I think there is a language barrier here that is impeding conversation. Please consolidate the links into one link to the site, and mark it with a language flag. Natalie03:47, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
sorry, i can't. if you see my discussion page history. you will find his so many 'vandalsim warning' post. i did not vandalsm. he defeated by me at Talk:Koror-Babeldaob Bridge discussion. he wrote so many 'vandalsim warning' post in my discussion page!. and are you admin? plz, prohibit Phonemonkey this user at my discussion page. thanks.Pgdn963
just test
test
vandalism garbage attack from Phonemonkey, once more
Please indicate in which edit I broke WP:Vandalism, using diffs. If you can't, then I will delete the above warnings in the assumption that the warnings were only placed there in retaliation for me posting legitimate warnings on your talk page about editing other people's comments on Talk:Koror-Babeldaob Bridge link you did here and here. Phonemonkey15:46, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
add one. vandalism garbage attack from Phonemonkey. when i delete this garbage, this user always repeat 'vandalism warning'. some type of attack. this user defeated discussion by me at [[2]] Pgdn96316:03, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
