Talk:HD DVD

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the HD DVD article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4

Electronics Mid‑importance

	Electronics portal This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Obsolete is not the right word

I can see in the recent edits of the HD-DVD article, that some users (including myself) don't agree with the "obsolete" word in the beginning of the article. To the people who agree with the word obsolete, please explain your reasons why the word should be on the HD-DVD article.

I can buy an HD-DVD player or HD-DVD discs, so Why is Obsolete? the format still exists so there is no reason to put that. The format was abandoned, but it is not obsolete yet. In the meantime I removed the obsolete and leave as is.--Juancdg (talk) 01:31, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is because a consensus was reached on the subject (see the most recent archive). However, I feel this needs re-evaluating, and would support a fresh discussion on it. SynergyBlades (talk) 02:08, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with the discussion's outcome. There are connotations of the term "obsolete" that accurately describe the HD DVD format, but there also are connotations that don't. The wording in question can be interpreted to mean that the format has been superseded by something newer and technologically superior, when we really are trying to state that it's been discontinued. So why not simply refer to it as "discontinued" instead?

Or we could just leave the lead as it is (without any such reference in the first sentence), as the third sentence clearly conveys that the format had been abandoned. —David Levy 02:34, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My preference would be for the latter, as the state of the format is clear enough in the second sentence, while more detail can be found in the third sentence about the format's demise, than can be conveyed accurately in the one word at the start. I know that "obsolete" was originally added after consensus to placate those IP editors changing it to "was", but with the format war long over it will be less likely anonymous editors will come in and change it to "was", and such edits can be just as easily reverted as people taking out "obsolete" (which has happened just as frequently). SynergyBlades (talk) 04:39, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to agree with David Levy on this. I like the idea of not having a word there. However, if you guys insist on having one, "discontinued" works for me. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 04:50, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that "discontinued" could be accurate for the article. "Was" is not right because the format exists and it's not completely dead. Leaving as "is" also could be Ok, because the next sentence explains about the current situation of the HD DVD format.--Juancdg (talk) 18:08, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Our sources tell us it is obsolete. The choice for me is or "was" vs. "obsolete". People took issue with "was" for the very reasons you state, so we compromised on "obsolete" ("is an obsolete" vs. "was a"). If someone can find sources indicating this is not true I believe it's relevant in the lead. —Locke Cole • t • c 04:50, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1. Replacing "is" with "was" simply doesn't make sense; the HD DVD format has not ceased to exist.

2. As noted above, the word "obsolete" has multiple connotations, some of which are inapplicable to the format. The word "discontinued" conveys only the applicable connotation.

But again, the format's demise is described in greater detail later in the lead. Why is it necessary to also note this (with less specificity) in the first sentence? —David Levy 08:11, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As I recall this all started because of anons adding it to the lead, so we discussed it to try and settle it. Honestly if it's stated elsewhere in the lead already I don't mind it being omitted from the first sentence. But I wouldn't be surprised to see the anons starting up again. :P —Locke Cole • t • c 08:29, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Toshiba abandoned the format and the HD DVD Promotion Group was dissolved. As such I would support the word discontinued since I would consider it to be the most accurate. --GrandDrake (talk) 23:28, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Of course HD-DVD is obsolete. The definition of obsolete, that "the format has been superseded" is the most accurate way to describe it. We already have references stating that blank recordable disks are no longer being made (Toshiba however built up a stockpile before ending manufacture). HD-DVD has been displaced by (that is, superseded by) Blu-ray. That's what obsolete means. It's bizarre that some people want to say the format is discontinued, but don't want to say it's obsolete. That's what obsolete is.--Lester 12:33, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that the discontinued status of HD DVD should be noted in the first sentence of the article but I do not currently think it is worth an edit war to add the word obsolete. I do think though that those who argue that HD DVD is "not obsolete yet" will have a harder time doing so with every passing month. --GrandDrake (talk) 11:28, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that anyone here is arguing that HD DVD isn't "obsolete" in the sense described by Lester. The issue is that the word also carries other (perhaps more common) connotations that don't accurately describe the format. The word "discontinued" conveys the intended meaning without ambiguity. —David Levy 12:24, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you look in a dictionary, you'll see that the word "obsolete" has several meanings. The first part of definition #2 from the first set ("of a discarded or outmoded type") accurately describes the HD DVD format, but the second part ("out of date") does not. (The format's age isn't a factor.)

No other definition on that page accurately describes the format. Some obviously are inapplicable to this context, but others (particularly "outmoded in design, style, or construction") would mislead people with such connotations in mind.

Essentially, the issue is that readers are likely to interpret the statement to mean that the HD DVD format has been superseded by something newer and widely regarded as better (just as VHS was rendered obsolete by the widespread adoption of DVD).

Conversely, the word "discontinued" conveys the intended meaning (and only the intended meaning), so what's the problem? —David Levy 12:24, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that there's still some "combo" (combined) Blu-ray/HD-DVD machines on sale (LG brought theirs to market around the time the format's demise was announced.) With blank disks no longer manufactured, the HD-DVD format is dead. It is superseded by Blu-ray not because it's bad, but because of market forces. Betamax was a technically superior format to VHS, but Betamax was made obsolete by VHS due to market forces.

When using a dictionary, not every one of the multiple meanings has to fit. The main meaning of obsolete, that it has been superseded by something else, accurately describes both Betamax and HD-DVD, despite the technical merits of both formats.--Lester 12:52, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1. I don't believe that there are any Blu-ray/HD DVD combo devices that haven't been discontinued as well. Some remain available for purchase until supplies are exhausted (as is the case with standalone HD DVD devices), but I'm not aware of any that are currently being manufactured or developed.

Your chronology appears to be off, as LG released its second combo player (which I own) before the HD DVD format's demise was announced. According to what I've read, that's when the product was discontinued and the development of a third model was canceled.

2. I'm not claiming that every definition of a word must apply or that it's incorrect to state that the HD DVD format is "obsolete." I'm saying that such wording is very likely to be misinterpreted (so the word "discontinued" is a much better choice).

3. Why do you regard "superseded by something else" as "the main meaning of obsolete"? I don't even see a similar definition at Dictionary.com. —David Levy 13:40, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If people don't make that stuff anymore, then that thing is undoubtedly obsolete. Words like "obsolete" or "was" would do best. The fact that some people who still have an HD DVD player that still works today doesn't count for its existence. 210.4.121.23 (talk) 00:25, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If there are still working players that people use, then the format is not obsolete. It may, however, be 'obsolescent'. 86.182.71.209 (talk) 16:26, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Star Trek

The first season of the original Star Trek TV series with modern CGI is available on Hybrid HD-DVD. Seasons 2 and 3 are not. Quite annoying to Trekkies and Trekkers who invested in HD-DVD players. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bizzybody (talk • contribs) 06:42, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seasons 2 and 3 were released with modern CGI and the same packaging style as Season 1, but on plain DVD only, not Hybrid HD DVD. Still annoying though, and that the Blu-ray release will be yet another revision of the packaging, so it won't match the Season 1 Hybrid HD DVD set. Meanwhile Amazon seems to be predicting that everything Star Trek will be re-released on Blu-ray, including the animated series. 198.183.6.22 (talk) 23:35, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

HD DVD still existing?

Just because you could still buy HD DVDs and players in some thrift stores, does that really count to say that the format still exist? Because HD DVD ended 3 years ago, what you can buy right now are just remnants of the format. You can buy them now but who knows how long they'll last, let's say 10 years from today.

Take a Ford Model T for example, it is possible for an owner to repeatedly renew its interiors and still make it run good as the day it came out of the assembly line. But that won't stop it from being referred to as obsolete, considering factories no longer produced them. 119.93.67.178 (talk) 01:01, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete or discontinued and "does not exist" are two different things. HD DVD is not a product (like a car or an optical disc), it is a format, described in its specification. A specification still exists even if products that implement it do not.—J. M. (talk) 05:44, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is just arguing semantics. Edison phonograph cylinders still exist (I have around a couple of hundred). Nobody would argue that the format is not obsolete. 86.130.28.8 (talk) 11:38, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disc replacements in the U.S.

A IP editor (who apparently doesn't understand that PR is part of the U.S.) has repeatedly removed PR from the list of locations, as in this edit. The material they are removing is well sourced, does not imply that PR is a state and seems to make perfect sense. Nevertheless, they are continuing to remove it, now with absolutely no explanation.

As the editor in question is moving toward longer blocks, now would be a good time to discuss the issue. - SummerPhD (talk) 03:42, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Payoff Rumors

I am removing the parts in the Decline section about "Rumors" that Warner Bros were paid $500M to drop the format or that Fox was considering switching to HD-DVD after being a very vocal and prolific supporter of Blu-ray. These rumors were debunked around the time they were started and do not belong on Wikipedia.

http://forum.blu-ray.com/showthread.php?p=534903&highlight=don+lindich#post534903

http://forum.blu-ray.com/showthread.php?p=478095#post478095, backed up by:

http://forum.blu-ray.com/showthread.php?p=488751&highlight=drunken+sailor+queen#post488751 Super Saiyan Musashi (talk) 21:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What about Ultra HD-DVD ?

Ultra HD DVD films are expected to be released this year.--Ezzex (talk) 04:18, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is no "Ultra HD DVD" format. You may be confused with Ultra HD 4K BD, or combining that with a package that includes a DVD. The red-laser "HD DVD" has no new updates. Dcsutherland (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:17, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 12 external links on HD DVD. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:14, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on HD DVD. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:26, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]