Jump to content

User talk:Secfan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ceyockey (talk | contribs) at 11:07, 29 April 2007 (warning - AssBot considered for speedy deletion). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Note: All of my user and user talk pages on other Wikimedia projects all redirect to their respective pages on the respective language of Wikipedia. If you want to talk to me, please state which Wikimedia project you are referring to (if not Wikipedia) on my talk page, and if necessary, I will most likely respond on your talk page, unless you want it on mine.


Hello, welcome to Wikipedia. You might like to start by reading the tutorial and introducing yourself at the new users page. For ideas of what to put on your user page, see Wikipedia:User page.

If you have any questions, you can ask at the help desk or on my talk page. Two useful tips are that you can sign your name using four tildes (~~~~) and you can preview your changes before you save using the show preview button. You can regularly find new tips on the Community Portal. I look forward to reading your great articles and I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian. :) Angela. 03:15, Apr 25, 2004 (UTC)

Hmm... not sure why I didn't fix that. Ordinarily, I leave an invitation to fix it on the talk page and come back in twenty-four hours to do it myself if the anon doesn't. Must've been a breakdown in the system.... Tuf-Kat 13:06, Apr 30, 2004 (UTC)

Hello, please provide an edit summary. Thanks! Hyacinth 00:56, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Do we really need so many redirects? Edward 12:31, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)

  • Maybe not, but they're not doing any harm :) Secfan 12:33, Nov 15, 2004 (UTC)

That term isn't really specific...any "higher level" courses for elementary or middle school children in America, Canada, the UK, etc. can be (and are) called gifted and talented. I know my school's gifted program was called that, and we're not in Western Australia. (I'm in Florida, USA.) Maybe this should get a rewrite with all the info in it, and the West Aus thing gets a passing mention. Mike H 03:36, Nov 29, 2004 (UTC)

  • Just following the format of Academic Talent Program. Secfan 03:38, Nov 29, 2004 (UTC)
    • It is worth noting that the term is quite generic, though. :-) Mike H 03:40, Nov 29, 2004 (UTC)
      • Okies, maybe I expand those articles soon to be more specific :) Secfan 03:41, Nov 29, 2004 (UTC)

Please stop adding the Commonwealth template to country articles. Wikipedia:WikiProject Countries has decided that these do not belong. - SimonP 17:50, Dec 3, 2004 (UTC)

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1
I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:
{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

OR

Option 2
I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:
{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Thanks for leaving me a message, your'e doing a great job with the internet TLD's all over wikipedia!
I think that totally undeliberatly you put the reference of .PS in the State of Palestine article. Since you're not familiar with the situation.

The Palestinians & Israelis signed a joint peace agreement back in September 1993. Under that agreement, a institute called "Palestinian National Authority" (or more commonly just "Palestinian Authority") was established. This is a semi-autonomous body that rules on the area allocated to by the agreements. Please refer to Palestinian Authority article for more details of this body.

Under that agreement, the U.N bodies allocated the PS code to the Palestinian Authority; 970 telephone code (please look!) to the Palestinian Authority; also, .PS TLD was later registerd to it. The Registeries might sometime suggest "Palestinian Territories" as the name of which the code was assigned to; but that's only to avoid political sensitivities. Please look in Palestinian Territories for more info of this term. (go to "Meaning of the Term")

The last but most important thing you should know- the Palestinian leadership "declared" a "state" back in 1988, at a conference in Tunisia. Of course that this "declaration" has no importance or meaning whatsoever, except maybe symbolic. But this especially after the Oslo Peace agreements in 1993, which "officially" ended the state of ongoing wartime. Anyway, the 1988 "declaration" marked that the area of the "state" to all of Israel(!), with the proclaimed capital being Jerusalem. The article State of Palestine is there because the Palestinian Leadership technically didn't call this off, but of course they have no intrest in having any connection with this declaration (which is equals destruction of Israel = no peace). Try to read State of Palestine details (on the right) - to see it's something irrelevant. If you're adding any information to it, you are giving a legitimacy to something even the Palestinians don't want to have connection to. But moreover- you are adding the details to the wrong article (it should be in Palestinian Authority) - but I guess that's due to lack of knowledge in this subject. VICTOR 00:36, Dec 12 2004 (UTC)

Lines in the template

I never wrote the template to use the word line, and removed it when youa dded it because it is fairly obvious by the colour coding from within the articles and the table itself. It also makes the spacing of the page very awkward, and they are generally not necessary and every other station template does not use them. Thanks! Páll 05:39, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)

I think we should keep the word Rail, more for the fact that when people in Hong Kong talk about the Tung Chung, we don't say "I'm going to take the Tung Chung line to Tsing Yi, we say " I'm going to take the Tung Chung to Tsing Yi," but people say "I'm going to take the West Rail to ..." and we don't say "I'm going to take the West to ...." Anyway, that's my 8 Hong Kong cents. Páll 11:02, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)

No no, I agree with using the word line in the article, which is why its used. The thing about the table is it is just that, a quick and handy reference so it is also important to make sure it is small and compact. I think, as it is a table, the context is clear enough without the word line, especially if we use the colouring. Páll 21:11, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Hi hello, would you be interested to contribute to Current events in Hong Kong and Macao? You may also be interested to take a look at Wikipedia:HK wikipedians' notice board. best, — Instantnood 07:40, Feb 4 2005 (UTC)

Hello Secfan. This template on former colonies of Portugal has been listed at Wikipedia:Templates for deletion by Jiang for some time. There is a discussion on whether templates of such kind should be removed. Your comment would be very helpful to the discussion. You may also be interested to have a look on the vfd of Template:Former British colonies. — Instantnood 16:39, Feb 10 2005 (UTC)

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labelled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

Edit summary text box

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

When you leave the edit summary blank, some of your edits could be mistaken for vandalism and may be reverted, so please always briefly summarize your edits, especially when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. Msh210 00:17, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Hi Secfan! You've made a large number of valuable contributions to Wikipedia during the past 16 months, and based solely upon edit count you are one of the project's top 100 editors. That said, would you please make an attempt to include edit summaries with your changes, as requested by Msh210 and Hyacinth above? If you have any questions how to best go about this, please do not hesitate to contact me. Best regards, Hall Monitor 20:20, 13 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Non-notability isn't grounds for speedy deletion. If you want to list this on VfD, go ahead. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 15:21, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)


Hey, I'm wondering where you got the US singles placing for Yellow... cuz the one your provided for Speed Of Sound is only Billboard Hot 100 and/or Modern Rock Tracks which only measured radio airplay and not sales. --Madchester 15:12, 2005 Apr 28 (UTC)

EPs arent considered albums and shouldnt be included on the list. JamesBurns 01:01, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

You contributed many redirs to 5678s. At what point does this become spam? --Sgkay 12:49, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

  1. 12:05, 1 May 2005 (hist) (New) The 5- 6- 7- 8's (top)
  2. 12:05, 1 May 2005 (hist) (New) 5- 6- 7- 8's (top)
  3. 12:05, 1 May 2005 (hist) (New) The 5- 6- 7- 8s (top)
  4. 12:04, 1 May 2005 (hist) (New) 5- 6- 7- 8s (top)
  5. 12:04, 1 May 2005 (hist) (New) 5 6 7 8's (top)
  6. 12:04, 1 May 2005 (hist) (New) The 5 6 7 8's (top)
  7. 12:03, 1 May 2005 (hist) (New) The 5 6 7 8s (top)
  8. 12:03, 1 May 2005 (hist) (New) 5 6 7 8s (top)
  9. 12:03, 1 May 2005 (hist) (New) The 5-6-7-8's (top)
  10. 12:02, 1 May 2005 (hist) (New) 5-6-7-8's (top)
  11. 12:02, 1 May 2005 (hist) (New) The 5-6-7-8s (top)
  12. 12:02, 1 May 2005 (hist) (New) 5-6-7-8s (top)
  13. 12:01, 1 May 2005 (hist) (New) 5678's (top)
  14. 12:00, 1 May 2005 (hist) (New) 5678s (top)
  15. 12:00, 1 May 2005 (hist) (New) The 5.6.7.8s (top)
  16. 12:00, 1 May 2005 (hist) (New) 5.6.7.8s (top)
  17. 11:59, 1 May 2005 (hist) (New) 5.6.7.8's (top)
  18. 11:59, 1 May 2005 (hist) (New) The 5,6,7,8s (top)
  19. 11:58, 1 May 2005 (hist) (New) The 5. 6. 7. 8s (top)
  20. 11:57, 1 May 2005 (hist) (New) 5. 6. 7. 8s (top)
  21. 11:57, 1 May 2005 (hist) (New) The 5. 6. 7. 8's (top)
  22. 11:57, 1 May 2005 (hist) (New) 5. 6. 7. 8's (top)
  23. 11:57, 1 May 2005 (hist) (New) The 5, 6, 7, 8s (top)
  24. 11:56, 1 May 2005 (hist) (New) 5, 6, 7, 8s (top)
  25. 11:56, 1 May 2005 (hist) (New) The 5, 6, 7, 8's (top)
  26. 11:56, 1 May 2005 (hist) (New) 5, 6, 7, 8's (top)
  27. 11:55, 1 May 2005 (hist) (New) 5,6,7,8's (top)

You just created a template for Golf-number combinations that I think is very interesting. (See User:Georgia guy/Letter number combinations) for the definition of this phrase.) Georgia guy 13:37, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to drop you a line to say thanks for fixing the albums/singles listing on the Apollo 440 page. You beat me to it by a couple of hours. I'd like to especially thank you for adding single chart placings, something I would not have put in. - pinkgothic 16:48, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Secfan - I have just speedy-deleted Template:Substub. The template was originally deleted in accordance with a :"delete" vote at Wikipedia:Templates for deletion, as it is no longer used - nor should it be, not even as a redirect. The Stub sorting WikiProject is strongly against its reintroduction, on the grounds that it actively hinders efforts to improve stubs. Please do not recreate it again. Grutness...wha? 01:54, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

What is the point to the GNumber template? It it meant to link together all the economic summets that are named as G number such as G8 and G20? Shanedidona 04:04, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for cvg redirects

Thanks for making sure that various computer and video game redirects are handled properly. (no need for response) Slike2 19:06, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

lots of edits, not an admin

Hi - I made a list of users who've been around long enough to have made lots of edits but aren't admins. If you're at all interested in becoming an admin, can you please add an '*' immediately before your name in this list? I've suggested folks nominating someone might want to puruse this list, although there is certainly no guarantee anyone will ever look at it. Thanks. -- Rick Block (talk) 00:36, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)

Hi, I noticed that you made a string of edits to Gunbound (good game, BTW) and while there's nothing wrong with editing, it's considered better to make all your edits in one edit, if that makes any sence. Just though I'd mention it. humblefool® 05:09, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Er, if you look on the record sleeve of The Man Machine or on the animation page for it on http://www.kraftwerk.de you'll find the they don't hyphenate it. You would do well to revert all your Kraftwerk edits back the the correct, unhyphenated spelling. (I mean, I'd do it myself, but it would take a good quarter of an hour, and it wasn't me who made erroneous edits now, was it? ;-) --feline1 15:03, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Where did you come up with that review? 211.30.211.93 17:10, Jun 26 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for catching those bloopers on the JC article. I was editing that page rather late into the night - I hope you don't blame me for making such an elementary mistake :) John Smith's 14:10 26th June, 2005

Hi, there. You've been kindly reverting some articles. Can you report this guy as well. Slim seems to be away - do you know anyone who's online? John Smith's 28 June 2005 09:31 (UTC)

Cheers, mate. If you have anyone trolling your articles feel free to give me a buzz. Same if you'd like some help with a project. John Smith's 28 June 2005 09:42 (UTC)

More edits over at Mao Zedong, though not necessarily by this user. Some are ok, but once again Jung Chang's views are being removed because she's "controversial". I'll consider some ammendments later on in the week, so please keep an eye out if they immediately start deleting them again. However I would really appreciate you adding to the debate. I'm tired of people discounting Jung Chang without actually backing up their allegations. Also if you feel you can/should put her views back in, go for it.

Cheers

John Smith's 28 June 2005 18:02 (UTC)

You should avoid embedding links in section headings (see Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings)#Links within headings). Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 13:11, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Hi, there. Listen I wouldn't get too excited about Jung Chang as a historian. She wrote a biography, so one can argue she's only a biographer. If it had been about the CCP as a whole, then certainly she would have been a historian.

For now I would just let her be referred to as an author, especially after Slim started getting involved. If you really feel we should list her as a historian I will change my mind and back you up. She still fulfills the description of a historian. However I think that we should not overplay our hand yet. Please could you try to find some articles where she is referred to as a historian, or where her works are referred to as "histories"? Because unless we can do that, we'll just start a revert war with the people who want to undermine her.

By the way, keep up the good work on necessary reverts. Message me if you have any problems John Smith's 30 June 2005 12:45 (UTC)

Why do you write {{Template:Userpage}} instead of just {{Userpage}}? Brianjd | Why restrict HTML? | 05:09, 14 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Can you not clutter the "protected" categories with your user/user talk pages? Brianjd | Why restrict HTML? | 05:21, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

KC articles

Hi, I was wondering what problem you had with the Kelly Clarkson articles? They seem to be working now, and I think we should keep them to the default single template. Thanks for your help with the images OmegaWikipedia 29 July 2005 11:47 (UTC)

Hmmm, what browser are you using? I usually use Firefox, and sometimes the boxes do get messed up on explorer for me OmegaWikipedia 08:16, 1 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Is it really vital to have all the singles on a seperate page unless one of the songs won an award or something? Why not just have redirects to album titles?

TheSeer 09:49, 6 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, claiming a widely used term like this for only a Nelly single isn't very productive. Do you use the "what links here" when you create pages? Now someone else has to make a disambiguation page out of it, would have been much handier if you had done that yourself. Just MHO. Lomedae 18:35, 14 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just wondering how you know the chart position of The Trooper by Iron Maiden (band) before its been officially announced on the chart show? :D --PopUpPirate 13:56, August 21, 2005 (UTC)

The user is blocked. Joyous (talk) 15:53, September 4, 2005 (UTC)

Huh? Brianjd | Why restrict HTML? | 08:32, 10 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I have added speedy deletion notices to both categories. Brianjd | Why restrict HTML? | 09:16, 11 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Vinnie!

So your a closet Wikipedia user. I'll be watching you. --cheese-cube 05:52, 24 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

gold digger #2 in the uk

Hi secfan, how did you find out that gold digger is #2 in the UK when the official top 40 isnt released until later today? and if you know what number one is can you please tell me, lol.Shawn88 12:43, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

VINNY VINNY VINNY HOI HOI HOI

Hoi, so wassup wit chu, how come like u been slack using wikipedia lately, or like you juz don't bother checking out my like contributions no more lol lol lol. oh wellz, anyways ba-ba oh and u should add like the blound hound gang song - fire water burn to like the section with bare naked ladies song - one week, like u know pop culture parts Darkroom Danny 07:34, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hey vinnie stop following me around and "fixing" my edits. I find it insulting. --cheese-cube 00:24, 1 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Rowan, if you made better edits noone would fix them. You can split your signature up like others (including me) have done, to include your talk page, to make it easier to contact you. Brian Jason Drake 08:44, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
It is not your place to criticise my edits and it isn't your place to answer for Vinnie. --cheese-cube 09:34, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I have every right to critcise your edits the same way you have a right to criticse Vinnie's actions. I'm not stopping Vinnie from answering for himeself. You haven't responded to my comment about the signature. Brian Jason Drake 10:15, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
If someone wants to reach my talk page, they can easily do so without the help of my signature. --cheese-cube 11:34, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Edit on the Janine Lindemulder article

Just wanted to drop by and thank you for the fix on the Janine Lindemulder. I appreciate it. :-) -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. Think out loud 18:50, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Interview request

Hi Secfan, I am a journalist with The Sunday Times, and I'm keen to write an article on Wikipedia, with a WA angle. May I interview you? If you're interested, please let me know via dcohen@amnet.net.au or 0414 780 441. regards, David Cohen

--130.95.191.2 06:46, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Crazy Frog Vandalism

Hi Secfan, I've noticed your name a lot in the changelog of Crazy Frog, thanks so much for your help with watching for vandalism to it, it's been a real vandalism magnet since I started it and I really appreciate the assistance! -- taviso 16:37, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]


Sorry mate! I've messed up your redirect and don't know how to rectify it. I wasn't being malicious—honestly :-) Gillean666 19:58, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation subcategories

You and your compatriots might be interested in the polls at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages)/Disambiguation subcategories. No reply needed, thanks.

--William Allen Simpson 08:55, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Basa

Hi, could you explain why you created Basa as a redirect to the disambig page Bahasa? I've found another meaning for Basa and need to create a seperate dab page for it. Thanks! Scott Ritchie 03:32, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Busta Rhymes

I've deleted your entry for "Put You Pussy On It" as the next single to be released off Busta's "Big Bang" album. It does not appear on the tracklisting 1, and I can find no evidence to suggest that this song even exists, let alone that it is going to be released. Sebastian Prospero 21:35, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jong

You created Jong as a redirect to Yang, but gave no reason why (Edit Summary is your friend!). I expanded it to an disambiguation page, so that I could have it link to Erica Jong. A quick google image search suggests that Jong might be a version of Yang (surname), so that's what I guessed, linking to Kim Jong-il as well. It also appears it is much more common as a Northern European surname (de Jong). Since you created the original, I hoped that you might have some insight into the page. JohnWhitlock 17:49, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Save "List of school pranks" From Deletion

Hi, the article List of school pranks has been targeted by the Wikipedia Thought Police™. Please help preserve this marvellous testament to human inventiveness—and cruelty—from certain extinction by voting Keep at the article's deletion page if you haven't already done so. May algid reason never reign supreme! Thanks, Maikel 15:15, 4 April 2006 (UTC) PS: This is a generic message that has been hand-posted to you as a former contributor—hope you won't mind.[reply]

Hi, there! I saw that you've contributed to the Yellowcard page. I've been working hard all weekend to get it into an encyclopedia-worthy article, and I think we're almost there!

There's a short list of things that still need some work at the bottom of the talk page. If you could take a look at it, maybe add more things to do, or clean up whatever you see needs work, I would sure appreciate it.

Thanks for your help. Have an awesome day!

N*E*R*D singles

hello, am i correct in thinking your edit on 10:47, 12 July 2005 to N*E*R*D implies that the single releases of 'Lapdance' and 'rockstar' featured the digital production found on the 2001 release of 'in search of...' , whereas 'provider' ([i]and[/i] the lapdance included in the same single) both featured the spymob (ie rock) versions of the 2002 worldwide release of 'in search of...'? and were the versions of the singles released the same worldwide? ~ Bungalowbill

Please do not redirect articles to non-existent pages. Is there a process-related reason why this is going on? (aeropagitica) 11:55, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

How are you?

I am proposing that the following article: Release Lillywhite Recordings Campaign be deleted. There is no proof that this campaign led to the recording of Busted Stuff, or was acknowledged by the DMB or RCA people. While the campaign was mentioned in Rolling Stone and Entertainment Weekly, I don't think that is grounds enough to have a separate article. Please comment on the Talk page. Thanks. Milchama 17:47, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted page "COSi"

A page you created, or image you uploaded, COSi, has been deleted in accordance with our deletion policy. In particular, it meets the one or more criteria for speedy deletion; the relevant criterion is:

Blatant advertising. Pages which exclusively promote a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic.

Wikipedia has certain standards for inclusion that all articles must meet. Certain types of article must establish the notability of their subject by asserting its importance or significance. Additionally, since Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, content inappropriate for an encyclopedia, or content that would be more suited to somewhere else (such as a directory or social networking website) is not acceptable. See What Wikipedia is not for the relevant policy.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable notability guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content; it will be deleted again and may be protected from re-creation. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article. If you have any questions, please contact an administrator for assistance. Thank you – Gurch 19:53, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Ass-bot

A tag has been placed on Ass-bot, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

yet another nice redirect

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 11:05, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of AssBot

A tag has been placed on AssBot, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

another nice redirect?

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 11:07, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]