User talk:Trey

Archives

Renamed!

I've renamed you.

We can't merge accounts so the way it works is that both accounts get renamed. User:TREYWiki was renamed to User:TREYWiki (usurped) and User:Ttttrrrreeeeyyyyyy was then renamed to User:TREYWiki. This means that your old account is now called User:TREYWiki and the TREYWiki account you made has been moved out of the way. I hope this makes sense! Secretlondon 12:11, 15 April 2007 (UTC) --TREYWiki 01:02, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Suspected Sockpuppets

This is Kd Lvr, who you have suspected being a "sock" of KDKATPIR2. I would like to tell you that I understand why you may belive this, because it does seem that we are. As I have stated on my user page, KDKATPIR2 is a very close friend of mine (I do not mean internet friend, BTW) so we frequently discuss edits to wikipedia pages via internet, phone, and in real-time. I am not asking you, or anyone else to cease investigating the situation, as it should be looked into, I really am being honest when I say, that we are not sock puppets. Thank you for your time, Kd lvr 22:26, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WE KNOW YOU ARE A SOCKPUPPETEER! and do not add stuff to the middle of my talk page and by friend you mean you think about your edits in your head, because they are both you. --TREYWiki

No I am not. I am definitely not. We are two differnent people with two different names, besides what sense would it make having a puppet anyways? There are already more users on here that agree with me; I don't have to make up false identities to prove my point. Kd lvr 01:52, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I am not a sockpuppet of User:Kd lvr , nor is he a scokpuppet of me. Just because we have similar views on the same things, doesn't mean we (as in TWO PEOPLE) are one. Other wikipedia users have the same views as us as well. Are you then trying to say that they two are the same as me and User:Kd lvr. I think NOT.Kdkatpir2 17:36, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notice how he uses the same formatting and style. HE IS A SOCKPUPPETEER!--TREYWiki 17:51, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You need more evidence to back up your LIE about User: Kdkatpir2 (me) and User:KDKAlvr(Tom). Kdkatpir2 18:17, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, give it up. You are not fooling anyone. You are one in the same. You screwed up yesterday and pathetically tried to cover it up and just did it again above. You are a puppeteer and User:Kd lvr not User:KDKAlvr is the puppet. Give...it...up. - SVRTVDude ^(VT) 18:25, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Splash Lagoon Image

I don't know if you noticed this but the image on the Splash Lagoon article uses the licensing template {{logo}}. But, (how should I put this without being overly blunt), it's not a logo. If you need help finding better templates to use, let me know. There are a myriad number of image templates (one for almost every situation and even I'm still have trouble deciding which is best).
Dtbohrer^{talk•contribs} 17:12, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I wasn't really sure what to put. I thought it was kinda like a logo for splash, but if you'd like to choose a better one, that is OK and Id appreciate it --TREYWiki 01:08, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just give the location and/or how you came by this picture and that will narrow down the numeber of templates to chose from.
Dtbohrer^{talk•contribs} 01:33, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

KDKA-TV

I think User:Kd lvr and User:Kdkatpir2 are one in the same. They make the same edits to the same page and notice the names...written the same way. I think one is a sock of the other. Just one editors opinion though. Take Care and Have a Good Weekend....SVRTVDude ^(V
T) 21:21, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

yeah I think so too, Im going to have to go thru all those AfD's and comment. Also ive put sockpuppet|}}on the user pages and disscussions. I did both, beacuse I dont know what one is which. --TREYWiki 21:28, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I had to take out {{ because that puts me in the Suspected socks.

No worries, I understood what meant:) I took a look at both users log pages and both accounts where made on September 18th, 2006, User:Kdkatpir2 at 16:49 and User:Kd lvr at 19:19. So, I am going to say User:Kd lvr is the sockpuppet of User:Kdkatpir2. - SVRTVDude ^(VT) 21:34, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Are you and Admin? Should we block them or report them to be blocked?--TREYWiki 21:35, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I wish I was an admin, but no. Let me see who is online and let them know. Gimme a moment. - SVRTVDude ^(VT) 21:38, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I tracked down an online admin (User:Dgies) and hopefully they can take care of it. If they start vandalising, we can report them to WP:AIV. - SVRTVDude ^(VT) 21:46, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

what about WP:SSP. BTW I will not be here for a hour or two.--TREYWiki 21:49, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Forgot about WP:SSP...duh on me:D Yeah, if you want to report there, go right ahead or I can if you like. - SVRTVDude ^(VT) 21:55, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is Kd_lvr. I would like to say that though it may seem favorable that I am a "sock" of KDKATPIR2, I am really not. I will admit, though, I am friends with TPIR2, and I do frequently consult with him about edits made to Wikipedia pages. Also, I would like to add that the pages made for KDKA's anchors are deserving and should not be deleted.Kd lvr 21:59, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kd lvr, you and User:Kdkatpir2 were created within 3 hours of each other on September 18th, 2006. User:Kdkatpir2 at 16:49 and you at 19:19. Look at the edit times as well. No edits happen at the same time, but do happen a minute or so after each other. Most of the time to the same pages. It is obvious you are a sockpuppet and bordering on vandal at this point. I suggest you change course quickly or you are heading for a suspension of editing privileges or an out-right ban. - SVRTVDude ^(VT) 22:05, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know it appears that way, and I don't blame you for thinking that, but it is not true. The edits may be at or near the same times, but this is simply because we are usually online at the same time!Kd lvr 22:09, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would also like to add: Do NOT strikeout my coments anymore. Kd lvr 22:06, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is terribly obvious that kdkatpir2 and kd lvr are related. I'm guessing Kd lvr is the sockpuppetier. It is not a coincidence that the edits are a few minutes apart. That is how long it takes to log out and sign on. He is using the sock to back up his claims on his own beloved KDKA anchor's AfD debates. This may be a tough case to sort out. But I am almost certain there is socking going on. --TREYWiki 00:30, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You thought wrong. Kdkatpir2 17:42, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

almost forgot, I dint really understand how to make a case at WP:SSP if you could do it, Id greatly appreciate it! =)--TREYWiki 00:33, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am getting more evidence. Look how they both bashed Write On. Here is the bashing Notice how he made two edits on kdkat and then two on kd lvr, about 4 minutes apart. See history. The facts have come together. HE MUST BE STOPPED . xD --TREYWiki 00:38, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How many times will I have to repeat this: we discuss our edits on the internet, and we were both on this afternoon!Kd lvr 02:11, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Many people are starting to not belive your lies. If you come clean, you might not be blocked in the long run. --TREYWiki 02:13, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He is accurate as am I. WE ARE TWO SEPERATE PEOPLE WHO ARE LINGTIME FRIENDS. Kdkatpir2 17:44, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commenting on my comments

I didn't do such a thing. I simply stated that I would know more than someone who watches more thatn just KDKA-TV.

This just proves the socking even more. Notice how when kd lvr was done with his ""comments"" he waited about 10 minutes then signed on to the SOCKPUPPET account and added a new comment. Notice how kd lvr makes two edits then he swiches to kdkat to make two more. This is getting more and more obvious. --TREYWiki 00:55, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gotta agree with Trey on this one, it is more than obvious. Give it up and come clean. You aren't fooling Trey and you aren't fooling me. - SVRTVDude ^(VT) 01:59, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm confused on this one. I don't understand what your saying right now. Please explain. Kd lvr 03:28, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

your going to get blocked forever, without a possibility of unblock (see your proposed community ban)--TREYWiki 03:30, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

KD, ya slipped up today, you were under the User:Kdkatpir2 account, posted "Commenting on KDKATPIR2's comments" header above. Immediately above this post is a post using User:Kd lvr ^[1]. The header "Commenting on KDKATPIR2's comments" was quickly changed to 'Commenting on my comments", though while still under the User:Kdkatpir2 account ^[2]. This is sockpuppetry at it's worst and I do mean worst. You can't sockpuppet here, against the rules. There is more than this, but you can't do that. The jig is up. - SVRTVDude ^(VT) 03:46, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Time to shut him down

I've proposed a community ban for this troll poll ... please endorse and add in anything I missed. Blueboy96 03:04, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cut and paste comments

I think you got ahead of yourself with the comments regarding local news anchors. Every single one was endorsed with the exact same statement regarding KDKA anchors, even for those who never worked there.

Although I agree that most of the articles should be deleted, you really did not give a reason that was more than a WP:IDONTLIKEIT. If you're questioning their notability, as I would guess, then you would be better off citing WP:BIO and why you feel it doesn't meet that guideline. DarkAudit 04:00, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

yeah, I got sick of writing it over and over when I was dealing with kd lvr. Is it agianst policy to do that? --TREYWiki 04:01, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's not really against policy, but it's a bad habit to get into. Especially when you weren't really giving a reason why the article in question should be deleted. DarkAudit 04:09, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CSN

Please note, as stated in the header, that WP:CSN is not a vote. This means using buzzwords like support and bolding your opinion are unnecessary. Furthermore, as I noted in my comment at WP:CN#Disruption_by_User:Miaers, since numbers are not counted in determining consensus (only arguments), "endorse per User X" are unnecessary; User X already offered that argument. Instead, if someone disagreed with X, you might want to respond to the opposition, but otherwise such a comment is unnecessary. Thanks. Dmcdevit·t 08:40, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks. It was my first time at the community sanction noticeboard. --TREYWiki 15:21, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An Automated Message from HagermanBot

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 18:45, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]