User talk:67.163.7.227
what is shakin? sup baby ! 67.163.7.227 19:14, 28 April 2007 (UTC) sign language plus power to the student body !
Duh? Please do not mess it up for everyone? Really !
huh? and no messages from where we are poor for vor ?
LFC is not KFC so do not burn us and do not fry us.
Demong is spot on !
Oh contrary, this is quite original and objective aside from being a comment about a real policy. What Demong said is correct, and s/he did say it. Notability is not a requirement for content. It is required for the inclusion of an article. Policy dictates that Mr. Walker is entitled to have his discography present in his article and he is entitled to have it accurate (sourced) as much as he is entitled to have a picture. The picture and albums do not have to be popular or contribute to his net worth. The Demong comment is original, and it is a winner. It is decisive. 67.163.7.227 01:20, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
- Demong did say that... but spamming that comment all about with his signature and not making any attempt to clearly and distinctly show that it was not he who was adding it to several pages was a rather dick move. Beyond that notability is a topic guideline... not simply an article guideline. A picture in the Walker article would absolutely be warranted if someone wanted to upload it; I would add it to the article myself. Mention of his involvement on an album of questionable notability is not so clear cut and should be decided by community consensus.--Isotope23 02:17, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
policy is clear to anyone that wants to read it Mr./Ms. isotope and from here to there this is the reality we, the community, will want to see here to there you choose your own community by blocking all our friends as soon as we "sign in" some of us might want to add to matt, lee, and other music stuff but you want to cherry pick what is on matt's site we have watched this and that and it does not add up if someone comes up with another reason for adding lee, you will shoot that down too pick off the pieces from MP3 and MySpace and you have even less of an article cupcakes only has/have MP3 and another item only has a MySpace who are you kidding? read what demong said and you can do the right thing or you can wait until your rfc is done by the way i read an rfc is not for content and you never discussed any of the content with anyone but the old guard everyone is tainted except for us or Demong that is a shame later gater
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons
^ important in what Demong said---uhhuh?
- Yes, yes... everyone who has spent a considerable amount of time editing here and understanding the policies and guidelines is "tainted"; the only ones who are not are the myriad of anonymous IP's who have suddenly showed up and started "improving" the Walker article with mention of an album that has repeatedly been spammed into Wikipedia and subsequently deleted for failing our rather clear guidelines... but of course this is about Walker and has nothing at all to do with Nysted right? How could I be so blind.
- Yes, yes... everyone who has spent a considerable amount of time editing here and understanding the policies and guidelines is "tainted"; the only ones who are not are the myriad of anonymous IP's who have suddenly showed up and started "improving" the Walker article with mention of an album that has repeatedly been spammed into Wikipedia and subsequently deleted for failing our rather clear guidelines... but of course this is about Walker and has nothing at all to do with Nysted right? How could I be so blind.
When citing policies here at Wikipedia, it might be a good idea to read them. WP:BLP for instance contains this:
"If someone appears to be pushing an agenda or a biased point of view, insist on reliable third-party published sources and a clear demonstration of relevance to the person's notability."
...so I invite you, or anyone else for that matter who is so interested in seeing this album in the article as part of Walker's discography to provide a couple non-trivial, reliable third party sources. So far we've been given Nysted's own sites, Amazon, Myspace, and an AMG "review" that is just the album cover. I'd sincerely like to see at least one place where this album was actually reviewed and mention made of Walker playing on it. Given the astroturfing and puppetry that has surrounded Nysted related articles I think that is a rather reasonable request.--Isotope23 03:11, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
leave it alone
this guy is so old school and so not going to listen or read he can only find two out of 10067.163.7.227 03:53, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
NOW YOU HAVE IT AND NOW YOU HAVE IT---WORD That's right it is a biography !!! Word ! It must be neutral and not slanted by Oberdic or firefox or crazyguy or whoever. The facts, the discography, a picture, etc. The sources must be accurate and verifiable. Go Matt !
wait just a minute bitte please? can mr. iso and his bunch change what matt has done with his life and change his bio to their liking and remain neutral---? no can mr. oberdictum decide what makes matt money and then decide that is what should be in his bio? no people of LFC, not KFC ---we rest our case---take it to the higher ups if need be--- to the master of disguisy ---like steadmonster or brandted
Shellfish, can you imagine prof. L. looking at this? Yo baby! I am loving that idea. Term P. here I come. XXX
no sex but you could add some lol !
 | This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |