Jump to content

Talk:Persecution of Christians

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ark~enwiki (talk | contribs) at 19:27, 3 June 2002. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The following section was removed "Israeli soldiers have expelled monks and nuns from Christian monasteries on Israel and confiscated their property in the last ten years. Although Christians have long been a small minority in this part of the world for centuries, their numbers have dwindled drastically since the nation of Israel was established in 1948."

This quote has been removed because it is contains no content and no context. I would say that it is Muslim Palestinian Arabs who have been responsible for the vast majority of anti-Christian actions. It is well documented by Christians themselves that Arabs in Israel have been complaining about the persecution they face from Muslimns. In regards to specific incidents of anti-Christians persecution by Israelis, if you want to bring any up, that is fine. But please note specific events with sources. And consider that the State of Israel actually funds Christianity within its borders.

In regards to the claim you made, there have been a number of incidents where civilians have been removed by Israeli soldiers in the midst of a fight with Palestinian guerillas. But this was because the Israeli Army was trying to avoid Christian casualties during a military operation against armed guerrillas. This is not a persecution of Christians? RK

RK, I was polite enough to ask you for sources before I deleted what I deemed unfounded statements. When I later learned that quotes of St. John Chrysostom or St. Ambrose of Milan were misquoted or taken out of context, for example, I added the context rather than delete the original text. I would appreciate the same courtesy. In any case, I'll restore the text with additional context and sources when I have the time to find the sources. As I recall at the moment, Timothy Ware wrote in The Orthodox Church that the population of Christians in Israel was around either 50,000 or 500,000 in 1948, but only around 5,000 at the time of his writing; latest edition was in either the 1980's or 1990's. The confiscation of monasteries was official Israel government action as documented on one of the Orthodox web sites; I'll have to hunt for that. --Wesley
The massive exodus of Christians from this land has been caused by violence and threats from Islamic militants. Many often preach or publish hatespeech against Christians, and some view Christians as "heretics" (which is wierd, since this is not how Islam traditionally viewed them.) Christians in Arab-dominated areas are often made to be uncomfortable by this pressure, and many have left. But how does this turn into Israeli persecution? Israel actually funds many Christian churches. As for the vague event you referred to, I am aware of an action in which civilians were forced out of an area where there was military action. I am sure that they didn't like this, and it may be a violation of some civil right, but it certainly is not religious persectution. If you are thinking of something different, actual persecution of Christians by Israelis, then please add this - but give specifics. What you gave before was misleading, as it blamed the Israelies for actions caused by Islamic fundamentalists.
Regarding the population figures, I'll grant that the evidence is highly circumstantial and be for the reasons you give. I haven't researched this area thoroughly. It's clear that Christians and Muslims both lived there for centuries before 1948, although probably not on the best of terms, and that the mass exodus happened after the birth of the state of Israel. But perhaps that event caused a backlash of Islamic militarism against both Jews and Christians that led to greater persecution by Muslims; I don't know. What churches does Israel fund, why do they do that, what conditions are placed on continued funding, and where is that documented? The event I'm referring to was not just moving people out of the way of a military action, it was permanent government seizure of at least two or three monasteries -- unless that's the same thing somehow. I'll try to provide specifics; I do recall that one of the affected nuns' last name was Stephanopolous, a sister of George Stephanopolous. --Wesley
Update: I must apologize, I was quite mistaken about the facts. The monastery involved was near Jericho, but it was the Palestinian Authority that confiscated it, not Israel. My own faulty memory is to blame. Further, their reasons were not to simply take property from Christians, but to transfer property from ROCOR (Russian Orthodox Church Outside Russia) to the Moscow Patriarchate of the Russian Orthodox Church. The property was purchased by Russian pilgrims in the 19th century. ROCOR came into existence in the years following the Bolshevik Revolution when the Moscow Patriarch authorized the formation of a Russian Orthodox Church independent of Moscow, fearing that he and the ROC itself would be utterly destroyed by Communism. To make a long story short, the Russian Orthodox Church did suffer greatly, but is now free of Communism and is slowly recovering. ROCOR still doesn't trust it though, and is maintaining that IT is the true Russian Orthodox Church. To the best of my knowledge, ROCOR is not recognized by any of the other Eastern Orthdox patriarchs, such as the Greek or Antiochian; however, the orthodox churches move slowly and cautiously, and it will probably take decades to sort out the mess, at the very least. The point is that the PA was simply trying to recognize the Moscow Patriarch as the rightful owner, at the latter's request for the return of property. The same sort of thing has happened with a few other ROCOR owned properties, and they have gradually been reverting back to Moscow over the last 50 years or so. If the incident is worth mentioning in the article, it would probably have to fall under disputes or persecution between Christians; again, I apologize for mischaracterizing it originally. --Wesley

I have added material about the persecution of Christians by Jews, and I've noticed that this subject ties in with that of Christian antisemitism, but I'm having trouble thinking of how to word the link. One question is to what extent was the persecution of Christians by Jews exagerrated to justify Christian antisemitism? Many of the passages people have attacked in the NT as being antisemtic recount persecution of Christians by Jews. Also, the ancient accounts of persecution of Christians by Jews obviously laid the groundwork in some ways for the blood libel -- in fact people such as Julian of Norwich and Anderl von Rinn, supposed medieveal victims of Jews, were celebrated as Christian martyrs, in the same way as Stephen, Peter and Paul.

Also, I think for balance, we should include some sort of link or section (or maybe even a whole new article) on persecution of others by Christians, and persecution by Christians of each other. We could link in there such things as the persecution of Greek philosophers by Christian Roman Emperors, expulsion and forced conversion of Jews and Muslims from Spain, the Crusades, the persecution of the Albigensians and Waldenses, and the wars of religion around and after the Reformation... -- SJK

We should also define what is meant by "persecution". There a number of different forms, and different levels of severity. --Wesley
In the last century Christians have been enslaved in the Sudan, and murdered by the dozens in many nations. However, such persecution seems to be socially acceptable, since no one speaks out against it, and the media hardly touches it. But if one Church is closed in Israel for security reasons, this gets ten times the media coverage of the mass murders of Christians in south-east Asian nations. RK
I agree, and that's exactly the sort of thing I'm talking about. If this is going to be done objectively, we have to include context, and some kind of sense of proportion. If possible, it would be helpful distinguish between isolated incidents and examples of broad types of activity; we don't want to list every single incident of persecution in all places at all times, any more than we would want to do that for anti-semitism or other sorts of behaviour. At the same time, by listing specific examples, we don't want to leave the reader with the impression that they are only isolated incidents IF they are not. --Wesley

In the Roman section, how about information on throwing Christians to the lions (in the coliseum) - did that happen?

Yes, it did. I think that's how Polycarp died in the second century. The story is recorded in Martyrdom of Polycarp, in which the story of his martyrdom is help up as an example for all to follow; for instance, he fed a meal to the Roman soldiers who came to arrest him. Burning Christians was also common, especially under Nero. --Wesley
True, but let's make sure we explain why the Romans felt that the persecution was valid -- Christianity was considered a threat to Rome because the refusal to honor (not believe in) the Roman gods could bring the wrath of the gods down upon Rome. Also, Christians were protected as Jews until the two groups made it clear that they were not the same. Finally, there needs to be reference to Pliny's letters to Trajan and his responses, which indicate a "don't ask, don't tell" policy. JHK
Good points. In fact, I think the Romans accused the Christians of being atheists because they didn't believe in the Roman gods. There was also at least one case, I think in Ephesus, recorded in which the statue makers or silversmiths saw Christianity as an economic threat, and therefore tried to get the authorities to arrest the leading Christians on trumped up charges. --Wesley

Please, please, move the external links to the end of the article. Wikipedia is not a web directory, nor is it an attempt to organize other content (though one must admit that would be a worthy project, it's not our project). --LMS

Yes. I believe the organize-other-content project is http://www.dmoz.org. Sort of like a yahoo directory of topics and subtopics, but definitely a community project. I don't read wikipedia to find links to other sites, I read wikipedia to see what others have written and contributed to this project. --Wesley

In the article,

for Christian missionaries to use synagogue pulpits to preach the claim that he would soon return, leading the armies of Heaven, to establish his kingdom, would have made the Jewish community vulnerable to accusations of treason, and thus to Roman punishment. Jewish leaders would have to supress any apparent insurrection, or risk Roman wrath.

seems unlikely since Jews were already known to the Romans as suicidal nutballs whose terrorist activities were extremely annoying. -- Ark

It is now time for Wikipedia owners to officialy ban "ARK". He is constantly vandalizing Wikipedia with anti-Semitic hatespeech. End it now.
RK, I agree the above line is insensitive, but from what little I know about the history of the area at the time it does crudely summarise a reasonably-widely held view about the Roman perception of the Jews at the time. I'm struggling, however, to see it as anti-Semitic hate speech, and AFAICT he has only contributed once or twice to areas relating to Judaism, which is hardly time to establish a pattern. Ark, please be careful how you express things, particularly on topics like this where, as you've just seen, things get passionate very quickly. --Robert Merkel

Actually, RK is referring to a couple of long and vicious arguments we've had about Israel and anti-Semitism. More than enough to form an opinion. (Whether it's a rational, justified or even sane opinion is a different matter entirely.)

I'm more concerned with possibly having made a mistake. Now that I think about it, IIRC, the articles I read said it's the Brits who thought the Jews were lunatics and couldn't wash their hands of the Middle East fast enough. But I also read that the Jews were as masochistic two millenia ago as the early Christians, so it looks like I lucked out anyways. :) -- Ark