User talk:Ryanzilla13

This is Ryanzilla13's talk page, where you can send messages and comments to Ryanzilla13.
Please sign and date your posts using four tildes (`~~~~`). New discussion topics go at the bottom of the page; click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Frequently asked questions.	Talk page guidelines Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Don't bite the newcomers!

re Template:***

What is this? Herostratus 22:53, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just a template I could put on whatever talk page I add coments to for example: Template:***.

am I allowed to do that or not? Ryanzilla13 22:55, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I i'm geuss not since it got deleted. Nevermind Ryanzilla13 22:55, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to change your signature (what you get when you type ~~~~), you can go to my preferences to change it. Kesac 22:57, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! It worked. ɤ|Ryanzilla13| 23:06, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent RfA

I'm sorry, but I've closed your Request for adminship prematurely. Simply put, you've only got 75 edits on Wikipedia; while edit count isn't the only determining factor, and numerous people have their own personal standards that the judge RfA candidates by, there was no chance that the RfA was going to pass.

I'm sorry about this, and hope you don't take it personally. If you continue to contribute to the project in a positive fashion, I'm confident that you could possibly run a successful RfA in the future. You may want to consider submitting yourself to Wikipedia:Editor review for feedback on where to get some good experience, and when you're ready for RfA again, there's a great Wikipedia:Admin coaching program.

If you have any other questions about becoming an administrator, please don't hesitate to ask me. Good luck! EVula // talk // ☯ // 06:31, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed with the above - I'd try again after 3-4 months and just keep contributing positively. There's a lot you can do without the admin bit set - I became an admin after a year on here and got through unanimously, mainly on the basis of my article contributions. I'd strongly suggest joining a couple of WikiProjects and helping to improve articles - while it's not a formal requirement by any means, participation in getting an article to Featured Article status is looked upon highly. (I actually send people to read What Is A Good Article? first because it's more readable, and if you get to that standard it isn't a huge leap to FA) Good luck. Orderinchaos 10:53, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough Comment posted by:Ryanzilla13^t̪ on 13:35, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No Hope (Band)

The article No Hope (Band) has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 19:13, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as No Hope (Band), to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Finngall ^talk 21:02, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No Hope

My friend, if you believe that you can make a good article about your band, that's good. But if you post short articles which do not show notability they are going to go on getting deleted. May I suggest writing your complete article in a sub-page (WP:SUBPAGE) and transferring it to the encyclopedia when complete?--Anthony.bradbury 21:09, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate redirects for your band's album

I have nominated your two redirect pages Hell in a Handbasket

#REDIRECT [[User:Ryanzilla13/Hell in a Handbasket]] {{R from Hell in a Hadbasket}}

and Album: Hell in a Handbasket

#REDIRECT [[User:Ryanzilla13/Hell in a Handbasket]] {{R from Album: Hell in a Handbasket}}

for speedy deletion, as they are inappropriate redirects from the article space to user space *and* appear to be redirecting to non-notable albums/bands.

If you disagree with the notability issue, please create the articles (as real articles rather than user pages) and assert notability as described at WP:NOTABILITY. (I notice that you have already created the article but failed to mention why the band was notable). Fourohfour 13:38, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto the BNH redirect. Fourohfour 13:43, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Almost forgot; the articles you're drafting in your user space haven't been deleted, just the redirects. Fourohfour 14:01, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Nohopelogo canada.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Nohopelogo canada.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:11, 10 June 2007 (UTC)