Talk:Dutch alphabet
name of letters
I'll need know how man calls the y, simply as [i] or as [ej].
and ÿ is call lange ij?
name for letter u is [u] or [y]?
and q, man calls it as [ku] or [ky].
I think y is called [ej], u is [y], q is [ku], am I right? However I can't imagine the spelling for ÿ.
The letters b, c, d, g, h, j, k, p, q, t, v, w are called like [be:], [ce:], etc., with a large vowel? I think they are pronounced more large than the letters f, l, m, n, r, s, x, z.
It'll be interesting to put on this remarks in this article. Really I am developing another article in Catalan Wikipedia and I'll want to know these data. THANKS
—Ludor 19:14, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
- In Dutch language many diphthong vowel-combinations are used (for example: ie, oe, ui, ei, ij, but also oo, aa, uu and ee are different from pronouncing the single vowle twice).
- Two of them sound like Y. The ij is called "lange ij" (long y) and the ei is called "korte ij" (short y). The character Y is called "Griekse ij" (Greek Y), "i-grec" or "ypsilon".
- ÿ is not used in Dutch, it has no special name (but sometimes in handwriting the combination of ij will look like ÿ)
- The y indeed usually appears in words borrowed from other languages. The y/ij confusion appears, but as far as I know officially the y is the 25th letter of the alphabet and the ij is seen as a combination like ui, oe, ie and ei.
- I am not used to phonetics, so I find it hard to answer your other questions.
- - Wouter, 30 October 2006
"Y" (as a separate letter) is most commonly pronounced as "Griekse ij" (Greek y), "i-grec" (from French) or informally simply "ij". Ÿ does not exist, "lange ij" is used to distinguish the diphthong "ij" from "ei" (which carry the same pronunciation but a different spelling). U is called IPA y, not u (which is spelled "oe" in Dutch, as in "voet"). Q is called IPA ky, not ku (koe, which would mean "cow", haha). Salaskan 18:34, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
IJ and Ÿ
In French Wikipedia man wrote:
- The cluster ij (graph : IJ/ij) is considered as a whole letter and it is collated after the letter i. Into the past, in certain regions, it was wrote with or without trema (graph : Ÿ/ÿ)
Here it is not write as that. Where is it right?
—Ludor 01:27, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
- ÿ has never been an acceptable variant for ij. However in old versions of Dutch ij was indeed written as y or i. The Afrikaans language still uses y where Dutch uses ij.
- As for collation, this all depends on where you look. When ij is treated as a single letter, it is either collated on its own after x, or combined with y (after x). When treated as i+j, it is collated under i. Jordi·✆ 05:44, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
Clarity
IJ is sometimes treated as a single letter indeed (e.g. with capitalisation and word games), but is never given a place in the alphabet. The Dutch alphabet is the standard Latin alphabet, and children are taught at school that the alphabet consists of 26 letters. The current article is quite confusing, as it says that the Dutch alphabet has 27 letters according to some, but it is always considered to have 26 letters by native speakers. I think native speakers create the language... Anyway, I think it should be noted in the article that IJ is generally not treated as a separate character, but rather as a special kind of digraph (which is capitalised together, filled in one square in word puzzles and letter separations, etc). Salaskan 18:55, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
- I disagree... in elementary school I was taught the alpabet ends with x, ij, z. The y was introduced later as being a letter used in foreign words like 'baby'. And every Dutchman or -woman who recites the alphabet ends with x, ij, z and never ever with x, i-grec, z. That the alphabet consists of 26 letters, that's a thing I do agree with. Richard 12:55, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
- I don't think any of these images depicts a accurate representation of a standard, (hand-) written, modern-age Dutch alphabet. The image on the page IJ (letter), though crude, is more truthful. But since you seem to be on a crusade against the letter 'ij' I remove myself from this endless discussion. Richard 09:59, 11 June 2007 (UTC)