Talk:Dragon Ball Z: Budokai Tenkaichi 3

Burdock images

I put two images of Bardock transforming into a oozaru, but I want them to be together. Like the second image underneath the first one. Can I do that? --Naruto134 00:00, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Personally, I like the images the way they are now (it fits in with the gallery format). But if you think you can make it so that the images are lying over top each other or side-by-side, then by all means feel free to do so. // DecaimientoPoético 14:20, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

US release date

Gamestop claims a come to the States during the Holiday Season. Should we put Winter for the release date or Fall? The Japaneese release date is Autum, which is fall in the states. Or was Gamestop saying it will be released in Japan in the holiday season?? Ugh to confusing. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.68.211.16 (talk • contribs).

I know what ya mean. All the sites seem to have the same release date, but none of them say where it's being released. The only lead I have so far on a release date for a specific country is Autumn for Japan (see http://dbzs.jp/meteor/). // DecaimientoPoético 22:40, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

I suppose we post Q4 2007 for the States' release date 'cause I saw the same thing at places like GameSpot. // SuperRocker529

They never specifically say that it'll be released this year in the states. I'm not saying it won't, because I actually believe it will, but saying it'll be released during the holiday season in the US without proof would be original research. // DecaimientoPoético 02:38, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Vandelism

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/66.231.2.104 This person keeps vandelising articles, and puts it random, non confirmed things. --Takuy 22:23, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Questionable images

Someone recently added images of a young Kuririn and GT Goten which looked like character previews for the game. I removed these for now for two reasons: one, there is no fair use claim nor source on either picture; two, they don't have Atari logos on them like the other character previews, which I find odd as Atari almost always tags them with such logos. Can someone take the time to see if these pictures are real or not? // DecaimientoPoético 01:16, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

They are fake most probably. We have never recieved characters first by Random Imageshack hosted previews., usualy by website, or V-Jump scan.. Also, they are saved and JPGs. All the previews are Gifs. And compare the position. In the official previews they were in front view. Also, why'd you remove the picture of Kid Goku looking at moon going oozaru. It confirmed him, and Oozaru. =( And those other 3 pictures I put, they had 2 different Faces, that means, SSJ, or USSJ was confirmed.--Takuy 02:02, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Also, this was just posted on atari; http://img02.picoodle.com/img/img02/8/5/26/f_FAKESm_8484434.jpg http://img02.picoodle.com/img/img02/8/5/26/f_FAKES2m_e2b09f8.jpg Proving they are very good edits. --Takuy 02:07, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Personally, I think we should kill all potential controversy and just not allow profiles shots of characters. A few gameplay shots from official sources is acceptable, but we don't need to indulge in poses, and it just opens the door to edits like those above. Onikage725 12:30, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

So, no profile shots? I'm okay with that. We also shouldn't post images of every new character or feature. In fact, we should probably stop adding pictures altogether and just use references to demonstrate the new character/fearure because the gallery will most likely be removed after the game is released and all the hype has died down. // DecaimientoPoético 13:51, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

I agree. Onikage725 16:02, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Correction

Fixed the external link to Wii-volution: Heres the before and after, http://www.wii-volution.com/game-news/atari-announces-dragon-ball-z-budokai-tenkaichi-3.html http://www.wii-volution.com/game-news/atari-announces-dragon-ball-z-budokai-tenkaichi-3-2.html The -2 displays the site properly I have found.

More confirmed Characters

Look here there is some more characters that have been confirmed. http://s206.photobucket.com/albums/bb52/leshark1/

is this a reliable source? --User:Entei-Anubis

I'm cautious to believe character profiles after our little GT Goten and Kid Kuririn incident. If you can get proof that Atari officially created and released this pictures, then I'll believe you. Also... who the hell is this supposed to be...? // DecaimientoPoético 00:05, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

I think that's the robot Goku faced in db, right before Krillin got his ass handed to him by General Blue. Im not sure though.The pictures fake. Some guy on the atari boards confessed to making it.SSJ Gokan 01:17, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Indeed, that is Kaizoku-Robo, the mechanical pirate. The S 05:05, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

This can be deemed fake now, as the Spopovich picture is different from the official one. Superior1 22:50, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Great Ape, not Ozaroo

Why are they still listed in their Japanese names? Its being released in America, so I beleive it is neccesary to change the names. --User:DOOMtech

Dont answer too quickly now. --User:DOOMtech

All Characters

I think we should put in all the playable characters that we know that are going to be returning in DBZ: BT3 because it be kind of stupid to have only a few characters that have been confirmed. Johnny542 00:33, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Original research. // DecaimientoPoético 00:51, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

I agree with him above it says a 150 characters meaning there approximately 30 new characters User:Kami-Sama

From WP:OR: "Original research (OR) is a term used in Wikipedia to refer to unpublished facts, arguments, concepts, statements, or theories. The term also applies to any unpublished analysis or synthesis of published material that appears to advance a position." Any unproven characters will be removed on sight per OR. // DecaimientoPoético 17:19, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, thanks, if any of you guys can do, it can make the article better. Also I will help out in puting the characters in if more people agree with me. But wait if there are 30 new characters, how come it says 20 in the article and in the websites, I'm so confused. Johnny542 18:57, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

There was 129 characters in BT2 and there are 150 in BT3, meaning there are 20 new characters in this game and Kami made a typo.

And as I said earlier, adding a character without confirmation and only the theory that since they were in the last game, they'll be in this one is original research and your edits will be reverted, no matter how many people agree with your idea. // DecaimientoPoético01:24, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

How come there are only 20 new, I can think of a lot more besides 20 like up to 30 or even 40. There are still lots that have not been confirmed like Hirudegarn's first form, Trunks' real Super form, General Rildo and all his forms, the DBGT versions of Goku, Vegeta, Gohan, Goten and Trunks and their Super Saiyan and Super Saiyan 3 forms, all the Dragons with the Dragon Balls, Bio-Broly and a lot more. Besides if you add 129 characters with 20 new, that gives you only 149, not 150 and if you add 134 with 20, it gives you about 154. Johnny542 19:06, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Okay, you can cut the smart ass act; it's not exact numbers. On the case for BT2, they said 120 characters yet there were 130 (in most versions). And this isn't a forum to list every possible playable characters, so I suggest you stop using it as such. // DecaimientoPoético 19:21, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

WTF Goten,Trunks,Vegeta,and Gohan never went Super Saiyan 3!!! I doubt they are going to include fan-fiction characters.--User:DOOMtech

Sorry, I meant for Goku, not the other Saiyans. Johnny542 21:19, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Release Date

according to IGN.com this game will be released in the US in november 2007... is this confirmed by the company or not?70.124.5.133 18:43, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Babidi & Spopovicth CONFIRMED

See Here, from official japanese forums; [1]

New characters confirmed

Babidi, Spopovitch, Videl, Gohan, and Majin Vegeta. Note that Gohan's Great Saiyaman outfit isn't the separate character itself, just an alternate costume for the regular Gohan (the character icon at the top shows Gohan and not the G.S. helmet). // DecaimientoPoético 16:53, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

That Gohan doesnt look like the Great Saiyaman it looks like his alt from BT2. There hasnt been a picture of G.S yet so we dont know if it's an alt or an alt character. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 165.13.166.201 (talk • contribs).

i think on the DBZ BT3 article it should have a list of all the charaters from tenkaichi 2 as possible charcters and have a debate about the new possible ones. the official website said 150 characters. it isnt neceserally an exact amount just a rough guide so there could be 155 chars. User:andrico1234 13:53, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Adding unconfirmed characters would be original research, a big no-no on Wikipedia articles. No rumoured characters, no this-guy-was-in-BT2-so-he's-gotta-be-in-BT3 characters, and no excpetions. Also, this isn't the place to "debate" on who'll be the new characters; conversation like that belongs on a forum. // DecaimientoPoético 19:19, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Yamcha, Piccolo, Hirudegarn (final form), Vegeta (second form), Gogeta (SS), Android 13 (fusion), and Chiaotzu. All names are based off the names from BT2 and may change over time. Also note that Yakon and Pui Pui are from Babidi's attacks, not playable characters. // DecaimientoPoético 00:51, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Babidi

Can we somehow mention Babidi's use of Yakon and Pui Pui with his attacks? It's confirmed with new information, and is pretty important. --ps2muse 00:30, 23 June 2007 (English Time)

Two questions: 1) Where has Yakon and Pui Pui been confirmed as parts of his attacks? 2) What makes it so important to note? // DecaimientoPoético 23:34, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Uhh, Poetic Decay, you just stated "Also note that Yakon and Pui Pui are from Babidi's attacks, not playable characters."So maybe that implied him to ask. User:Fonzie77

Look at the time difference; I posted that a day after my comment in this discussion. // DecaimientoPoético 22:00, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Sorry my mistake.User:Fonzie77