Jump to content

Child labour

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jackaranga (talk | contribs) at 11:00, 25 June 2007 (Reverted 1 edit by 82.110.221.77 identified as vandalism to last revision by Wimt. using TW). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Child laborers coming out of a dye factory, Dhaka, Bangladesh

labor (or child labour) is the employment of children under an age determined by law or custom. This practice is considered exploitative by many countries and international organizations. Child labor was not seen as a problem throughout most of history, only becoming a disputed issue with the beginning of universal schooling and the concepts of laborers and children's rights.

Child labor can be factory work, mining or quarrying, agriculture, helping in the parents' business, having one's own small business (for example selling food), or doing odd jobs. Some children work as guides for tourists, sometimes combined with bringing in business for shops and restaurants (where they may also work as waiters). Other children are forced to do tedious and repetitive jobs such as assembling boxes, or polishing shoes. However, rather than in factories and sweatshops, most child labor occurs in the informal sector, "selling on the street, at work in agriculture or hidden away in houses — far from the reach of official labor inspectors and from media scrutiny."[1]

The most controversial forms of work include the military use of children as well as child prostitution. Less controversial, and often legal with some restrictions, are work as child actors and child singers, as well as agricultural work outside of the school year (seasonal work).

Human rights

The United Nations and the International Labour Organization consider child labor exploitative,[2][3] with the UN stipulating, in article 32 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child that:

...States Parties recognize the right of the child to be protected from economic exploitation and from performing any work that is likely to be hazardous or to interfere with the child's education, or to be harmful to the child's health or physical, mental, spiritual, moral or social development.[3]

In many countries,[4] it is considered inappropriate or exploitative if a child below a certain age works, excluding household chores or schoolwork. An employer is often not allowed to hire a child below a certain age. This minimum age depends on the country; in the United States, the minimum age to work in an establishment without parents' consent and restrictions is age 16.

Many children as young as four are employed in production factories with dangerous, and often fatal, working conditions.[5] Based on this understanding of the use of children as labourers, it is now considered by wealthy countries to be a human rights violation, and is outlawed, while some poorer countries may allow or tolerate it.

Poor families often rely on the labours of their children for survival, and sometimes it is their only source of income. This type of work is often hidden away because it is not in the industrial sector. Child labour is employed in subsistence agriculture, in the household, or in the urban informal sector. In order to benefit children, child labour prohibition has to address the dual challenge of providing them with both short-term income and long-term prospects. Some youth rights groups, however, feel that prohibiting work below a certain age violates human rights, reducing children's options and leaving them subject to the whims of those with money. The reasons a child would consent or want to work may vary greatly. A child may consent to work if, for example, the earnings are attractive or if the child hates school, but such consent may not be informed consent. The workplace may still be an undesirable situation for a child or adult in the long run.

The United States also has extensive child labour laws. In the 1990s every country in the world except for Somalia and the United States became a signatory to the Convention on the Rights of the Child, or CRC. The CRC provides the strongest, most consistent international legal language prohibiting illegal child labour.

Child laborer, Newberry, South Carolina, 1908

In the West, during the Industrial Revolution, use of child labor was commonplace, often in factories, but on the decline. In England and Scotland in 1788, about two-thirds of the workers in the new water-powered textile factories were children.[6] Subsequently, largely due to the campaigning of Lord Shaftesbury, a series of Factory Acts were passed to restrict gradually the hours that children were allowed to work, and to improve safety.

Karl Marx argued that the industrial revolution increased hardship for children.[7] Historian E. P. Thompson notes in The Making of the English Working Class that child labor was not new, and had been "an intrinsic part of the agricultural and industrial economy before 1780"; however he argues that "there was a drastic increase in the intensity of exploitation of child labour between 1780 and 1840, and every historian acquainted with the sources knows this is so. This was true in the mines, both in inefficient small-scale pits where the roadways were sometimes so narrow that children could not easily pass through them; where - as the coal face drew further away from the shaft - children were in demand as 'hurreyers' and to operate the ventilation ports. In the mills, the child and juvenile labour force grew yearly; and in several of the out-worker or 'dishonourable' trades the hours of labour became longer and work more intense."[5]

Other historians have disagreed with this verdict. Objectivist economic historian Robert Hessen says

"claims of increased misery...[are] based on ignorance of how squalid life actually had been earlier. Before children began earning money working in factories, they had been sent to live in parish poorhouses, apprenticed as unpaid household servants, rented out for backbreaking agricultural labor, or became beggars, vagrants, thieves, and prostitutes (Nutten). The precapitalist "good old days" simply never existed"[8]

William Anderson writes,

"The pre-factory age was not a time of happy, contented kids. From 1730 to 1740, 75 percent of children in England died before age five. From 1810 to 1829, supposedly the evil age of the factory, infant mortality fell to 32 percent and would continue to drop. Capitalism and the industrial revolution gave youngsters a chance to survive. "[9]

Laws were passed to prohibit child labor in the industrialized countries; however it is unclear whether this legislation is the principal cause of the decline in levels of juvenile employment.[10] Research by Clark Nardinelli suggests that child labor was already decreasing in the United States and Western Europe prior to the passage of legislation, due to an increasing demand for educated and literate adults brought about by an increasing technological sophistication of industry. The demand for educated workers also provided an incentive for children to stay in school to meet the new demands of industry.[10] Nardinelli, a neoclassical economist, has been accused of suggesting that children essentially volunteered to be exploited, submitting, for example, to whippings out of a kind of entrepreneurial initiative.[11]

Boycotts

Two girls wearing banners with slogan "ABOLISH CHILD SLAVERY!!" in English and Yiddish. Probably taken during May 1 1909 labor parade in New York City.

Concern has been raised about the buying public's moral complicity in purchasing products assembled or otherwise manufactured in developing countries with child labor. Others have raised concerns that boycotting products manufactured through child labor may force these children to turn to more dangerous or strenuous professions, such as prostitution or agriculture. For example, a UNICEF study found that 5,000 to 7,000 Nepalese children turned to prostitution after the United States banned that country's carpet exports in the 1990s. Also, after the Child Labor Deterrence Act was introduced in the US, an estimated 50,000 children were dismissed from their garment industry jobs in Bangladesh, leaving many to resort to jobs such as "stone-crushing, street hustling, and prostitution," -- all of them, according to a UNICEF study.[1] "more hazardous and exploitative than garment production". The study says that boycotts are "blunt instruments with long-term consequences, that can actually harm rather than help the children involved."

Current Corporate Campaigns

Today there are several industries and corporations which are being targeted by activists for their use of child labor.

Rubber

The Firestone Tire and Rubber Company operate a rubber plantation in Liberia which is the focus of a global campaign called Stop Firestone. Workers on the plantation are expected to fulfill a high production quota or their wages will be halved. As a result, many workers are forced to bring children to work. The International Labor Rights Fund filed a lawsuit against Firestone (The International Labor Fund vs. The Firestone Tire and Rubber Company) in November 2005 on behalf of current child laborers and their parents who had also been child laborers on the plantation.

Cocoa

Defense of Child Labor

Child laborer, New Jersey, 1910. Click image for more background on the specific child.

Children's participation in economic activity was commonplace prior to the Industrial Revolution as children performed labor on their farms or for their families. Milton Friedman claimed that the Industrial Revolution saw a net decline in child labor, rather than an increase.[12] This is well supported by both economic theory and empirical evidence.[13][14] According to this theory, before the Industrial Revolution virtually all children worked in agriculture. During the Industrial Revolution many of these children moved from farm work to factory work. Over time, as real wages rose, parents became able to afford to send their children to school instead of work and as a result child labor declined, both before and after legislation. While accepting this overall child labor declined in this period, other commentators draw a qualitative distinction between domestic work and participation in the wider (waged) labor-market.[5] The usefulness of the experience of the industrial revolution in making predictions about current trends has been disputed. Economic historian Hugh Cunningham notes that:

"Fifty years ago it might have been assumed that, just as child labour had declined in the developed world in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, so it would also, in a trickle-down fashion, in the rest of the world. Its failure to do that, and its re-emergence in the developed world, raise questions about its role in any economy, whether national or global."[14]

Friedman believed that the absence of child labor is a luxury that many poor states cannot yet afford. To prohibit it is to prevent the economic growth necessary to relieve a society of the need for child labor. In poor societies these children will be put to work by their families by whatever means because they cannot afford to feed idle and unproductive children. Moreover, in addition to possibly increasing family costs on a depleted family income, parents may have to forego potential labor time and income, to care for idle children.[12] Some argue that if industrial child labor is legally forbidden, then many children are relegated to working in more dangerous black market occupations such as prostitution.[15]

References

  1. ^ a b "The State of the World's Children 1997". UNICEF. Retrieved 2007-04-15.
  2. ^ "Worst Forms of Child labor Recommendation, 1999". International labor Organization. Retrieved 2006-10-05.
  3. ^ a b "Convention on the Rights of the Child". United Nations. Retrieved 2006-10-05.
  4. ^ "Ratification of the Convention on the Rights of the Child". Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. Retrieved 2006-10-05.
  5. ^ a b c E. P. Thompson, The Making of the English Working Class, (Penguin, 1968), pp. 366-7
  6. ^ Douglas A. Galbi. 1994. Child Labor and the Division of Labor in the Early English Cotton Mills. Pre-publication draft of a paper published in the Journal of Population Economics. Retrieved on April 15, 2007.
  7. ^ Marx. Karl. Capital. vol. I. Chicago: Charles H. Kerr & Company, 1909
  8. ^ Hessen, Robert, Capitalism, Concise Encyclopedia of Economics
  9. ^ Anderson, William (1996). "Kathie Lee's Children". Free Market, Volume 14, Number 9. Retrieved 2006-11-01.
  10. ^ a b Nardinelli, Clark, Child Labor and the Industrial Revolution (Indiana University Press, 1990)
  11. ^ Michael Perelman, The Perverse Economy: The Impact of Markets on People and the Environment (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003). pp 153-154
  12. ^ a b Friedman, Milton. Take it to the Limits: Milton Friedman on Libertarianism." Interview. February 10 1999.<http://www.uncommonknowledge.org/99winter/324.html#top>
  13. ^ Nardinelli, Clark. "Child Labor and the Factory Acts." Journal of Economic History, Dec. 1980.<http://www.jstor.org/view/00220507/di975653/97p03175/>
  14. ^ a b Hugh Cunningham, "The Employment and Unemployment of Children in England c.1680-1851." Past and Present. Feb., 1990 Cite error: The named reference "cunningham" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  15. ^ DeGregori, Thomas R., "Child Labor or Child Prostitution?" Cato Institute.

See also

Template:Organized labour portal

International conventions and other instruments:

Types of programmes focussing on child labour

Country-specific programmes:

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Child_labour&oldid=140496275"