Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2007 June 26

June 26

Third opinion → Wikipedia:Third opinion

Cross namespace redirect. --Hetar 00:03, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete "third opinion" is a general concept, and we might well want to have a general article there.DGG 02:37, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per DGG. Shalom ^Hello 16:13, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per DGG. --- RockMFR 17:18, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - Per DGG. I'll put it up for speedy right now. Cool Blue^{talk to me} 22:07, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cheeseburger Eating Surrender Monkey → Republican Party (United States)

The result of the debate was speedied. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 23:54, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if I've done something wrong in this listing, it's the first time I've found a redirect page that's vandalism (qualifies as an attack page, I believe). The user has this as his/her only edit. Accounting4Taste 20:31, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Logan's Run (2007 film) → Logan's Run (2010 film)

The remake of this film will not be released in 2007, as there is no actual production of the project yet. Page history has been moved to Logan's Run (2010 film) per IMDb's estimated release year (which it estimated was 2007 before) for the sake of preservation, but the 2010 article will redirect to the source article until production begins. Erik (talk • contrib) - 15:08, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for now. Someone might have heard that it will be released in 2007 a few years back, and is searching for it now, as it's this year, looking for more information. No harm in keeping it. hmwith talk 22:54, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Factotum → Talk:Factotum (novel)

The result of the debate was Blanked. No need for actual deletion. -- JLaTondre 00:43, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Factotum article talk page redirects to talk page of Factotum (novel), hindering discussion of the Factotum article. History contains only a move and a robot double redirect fix. The Storm Surfer 01:44, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blank the page That's what I'm about to do. It's pretty much a no-brainer. If anyone wants to actually delete the page, go ahead. Shalom ^Hello 05:36, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Red-Al → Lithium aluminium hydride

The result of the debate was No longer a redirect. -- JLaTondre 11:16, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Red-Al" is a synonym for sodium bis(2-methoxyethoxy)aluminumhydride, not lithium aluminum hydride. The redirect should be deleted to avoid confusion between these two distinctly different (although related, hence increased cause for confusion) chemical entities. 68.43.182.159 14:22, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Write a new stub. Based on this ACS abstract, the nominator is correct. We don't have an article on sodium bis(2-methoxyethoxy)aluminumhydride, so let's create the stub, using that abstract as a reference, and redirect the formal IUPAC name in that direction. I'd do it now but I have to go for real-world concerns. Shalom ^Hello 17:31, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Write stub. bibliomaniac 15 ^{BUY NOW!} 23:55, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I wrote a little stub and will expand it shortly. --Ed (Edgar181) 01:41, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.