Talk:Stroke (CJK character)/Archive 1

Unicode

The Unicode table may be merged with the "basic strokes" table. I have no idea how the cryptic Unicode character names map to the strokes' actual names, but if anyone does, please merge them. dab (ᛏ) 19:49, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CDL

A XML based "Character Description Language" building characters from 39 basic strokes: http://www.wenlin.com/cdl (Perhaps the future standard)212.202.70.158 23:19, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm really interesting by this 39 basic strokes but I didn't found the line, can you help me to find the good sentence to read. <PS: sorry for my average English, I'm french> --Yug (talk) 12:11, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine, I found it : http://www.wenlin.com/cdl/cdl_strokes_2004_05_23.pdf . I found 38 true stroke (for me "o" is not strickly a stroke, but korean people use it so.... You can be right), in which one seem to be a mistake.

Anyway, I read some of this files and then was really astonished by the work they made. So I expanded the Character Description Language article. :)

--Yug (talk) 12:17, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Moved from the Talk:Stroke (Chinese character) page

To avoid confusion. Exploding Boy 21:15, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Does anyone care to create a sample character with which each stroke is given a number? -- Taku 08:30, Mar 9, 2004 (UTC)

See commons:Category:CJK stroke order --Yug (talk) 19:03, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

I propose that this page be moved to Stroke (CJK character). The current title doesn't follow the naming policy: it should be singular, and it should be descriptive. Exploding Boy 21:11, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article has been renamed from CJK strokes to stroke (CJK character) as the result of a move request. --Stemonitis 20:11, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merger

I propose that the Stroke order article be merged into this one, since it appears that a fair amount of the information is duplicated. Exploding Boy 21:11, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stroke order is a far more common term, so if there is a merge, I think that it should go in the opposite direction. Dekimasuよ! 00:44, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposition seen. Global opinion : allow an user with amateur understanding of the Stroke order and CJK strokes lead this is a mistake. --Yug (talk) 10:32, 26 June 2007 (UTC) [yug, de facto forbidden to correct mistakes and to lead this issue][reply]

I second to the proposal. The two look alike to me as well. I wonder why this didn't happen before. -- Taku 05:46, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]