Jump to content

Talk:Metallica's ninth studio album

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Dimedude (talk | contribs) at 16:22, 2 July 2007 (Tenth). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconAlbums Redirect‑class
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
RedirectThis redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on 20/9/2006. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Proposed deletion

I deleted the proposed deletion for the following reasons:

  • Future albums are not considered "crystal balling"
  • Metallica has stated on their official site they are recording their next album
  • Rick Rubin has said he is producing it
  • Metallica has played the two new songs on tour, and they are rumored to be on the album
I understand your concerns, but this is a clear-cut case of an expected and future album that will be released. Anthony Hit me up... 01:17, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bob Rock/...And Justice For All

I don't know who keeps changing the sentence about this being the first album since . . . And Justice For All to not be produced by Bob Rock, but it is inaccurate. Justice was produced by Fleming Rasmussen, and there is absolutely no mention of Rock anywhere in the liner notes.

The first album that Rock produced was the Black Album in 1991.

That's the point. The last album not produced by Rock was And Justice, therefore making this one the first album NOT produced by Rock since Justice. The grammar is correct. Anthony Hit me up... 16:12, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And whoever edited this page wrote the wrong date for ...And Justice for All. It was released in 1988 not in my year, which is 1989. Alex 22:47, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Enough of this. I just reworded that whole thing so that there is no dispute. J-Dog 19:46, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shed Light Upon

SHED LIGHT UPON —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hellishreignxx0 (talkcontribs) 18:44, 25 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Tenth

This is metallica tenth stuido album!

Is it...? Name 'em. Or I will. 1-Kill Em All, 2-Lightning, 3-Puppets, 4-Justice, 5-Black Album, 6-Load, 7-ReLoad, 8-St Anger, then 9-the new one. That's it; those are the only studio albums. Live albums and cover albums do not count as studio albums. If you disagree, go read what defines a studio album. Let's not have an editing war over this either. It's number nine, period. J-Dog 21:49, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Then why does is say "St. Anger is the ninth studio album by American thrash metal band Metallica" on the St.Anger page? Edit this page or the St. Anger one. 213.114.217.188 09:43, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Garage inc is probably included in the count

Garage Inc. is covers/compilation, shouldn't be included. Adamravenscroft 16:52, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

They may be covers, but its still a studio album. 143.92.1.33 03:45, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Look at what DEFINES a studio album, and you'll see that covers do NOT count, because they are NOT original new material. I quote: A studio album is a collection of previously unreleased, studio-recorded tracks by a recording artist. It usually does not contain live recordings or remixes, and if it does, those tracks do not make up a majority of the album and are often called "bonus tracks".-studio album 68.37.167.19 01:45, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I believe Garage Inc. falls under this definition of a studio album. The included "Garage Days Revisited" disc could/should be considered a "bonus" disc, but disc 1 only contains tracks that were recorded in a studio and which had never been released previously. I think the "previously unreleased" portion of the definition is meant to exclude "best of" albums, for instance (where the exact same recordings had been released previously). While the lyrics and basic melodies of the songs on Garage Inc. had been released previously by other bands, the tracks on Garage Inc. are original, never-before-released, studio recordings. Super_C 21:18, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What about S&M? Maybe the St. Anger page counted it. I don't know. This is the ninth studio album, though. Powerslave (talk-contribs) 22:33, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, S&M would be excluded according to the definition of "studio album" cited by 68.37.167.19 above (because it's live). But, in my opinion, Garage Inc. should be considered a studio album (my reasons are in my last post, above), which would make the new, upcoming album studio album #10. Super_C 22:45, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Metallica call it their ninth original here and St. Anger the 8th studio here. Adamravenscroft 09:44, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, there you go; can't argue with that. Thanks Adamravenscroft! Super_C 15:35, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Amen!--OgreCorps 20:09, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eesh, in the recent interview with krone.at, Hammett refers to the album as their eleventh studio album. How could that be?? R-Tiztik 17:04, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As quoted on the article itself: "Kirk Hammett: Yeah, it’s our eleventh studio album, but it feels like our sixth." This page is one big contradiction.

Kirk is obviusly counting Garage Days and Garage Inc so its 1.Kill em all 2.Ride 3.Master 4. Garage Days 5. Justice 6.Black 7. Load 8. Reload 9.Garage Inc 10.St Anger 11.New Album. so by saying it feels like their sixth... he means its a worthy sequel to Justice!!? Fuck Yeah I'll have a bit of that, if its anything like the power four tallica albums... Hoooollllleeeee fuuuck! Music could be coaxed back to the way it shoulda stayed! Thrash!! 80s!!!! Metallica!!!!! I believe they can do it like I really do.--Dimedude 16:22, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

obvious

as obvius as it is as soon as possible please get a title and pictureI am Paranoid 20:08, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]