Jump to content

User talk:とある白い猫

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by とある白い猫 (talk | contribs) at 21:55, 13 June 2005 (cleanup). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Number of reverts of this page by User: Davenbelle: 6

Number of reverts of this page by User: Stereotek: 6


User:Coolcat/Talk Template User:Coolcat/Contacts

Personal thoughts and frame of mind

I agree. → JarlaxleArtemis 04:14, May 10, 2005 (UTC)
  • People who live in the past will always stay in the past, people who live in the future who don't learn from the past still live in the past. I live in the future learning from peoples' mistakes in the past as well as my own. Cool Cat My Talk
Things I learned so far.
NEVER EVER let laptop be luggage rather than carry-on, TSA people are too stupid to handle a laptop. Yes I am a terrorist, I was a suicide bomber 4 times in the past year. You can find my peices scattered on 4 different blast zones in 4 different continents. :P
User:Davenbelle + User:Stereotek <-> me
Was this a personal attack? Not really. It's what I think.
Am I actualy using this "how to" on my wikipedia edits? No, but they do.
Is this how I see my dispute regarding User:Stereotek and User:Davenbelle? Yes.
Am I EXTREMELY annoyed? If you haven't already figured the answer to this...
Who am I? Non of your business.
What nationality am I? Non of your business as well.
Do I value my anonimity? Yes.
Is there a single google hit of my full name? No.
Will such a site cease to exist on sight? Yes.
Was that an idle threat? Yes.
Am I punishing wikipedia? No, I just lost my enthusiasm. It cannot be artificialy restored.
Why is a person who dreams of reaching stars and who studies possibilities of FTL is stuck with POV disputes on every article he goes? No idea.

User posts: Wednesday, 8 January 2025 - 00:22 (UTC)

I am no longer part of wikipedia outside of my userspace. I do not care what happens outside of my userspace. Don't ask me anything regarding any of my ex edits. I dont care. I wont be responding anymore so dont bother.

That's Great

Hey thanks for telling me that, since I know nothing about history. NOT! Yes, I know that history is often written by the winners, but I also know that sometimes on Wiki, history is written by idiots. So yeah go ahead write all the crap articles that you want, if I relied purely on Wiki for historical knowledge I'd be a fool.

Dont ever post anything in my userspace again untill you mature into an adult. --Cool Cat My Talk 03:15, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Saladin Eyyubi

Hi,

I want to get a clear perspective on the man who is called Saladin Eyyubi.

I have read about this man. In some pages there stay that he is arabic, in some that he is kurdish and in som that he is turkish.

What's the true? I have read what you have written. On what bases do you ground your facts? Did you really engaged in the history of Saladin or did you put something together about what you have heard from older historians. Is there any definitive statements that can prove what origin Saladin has? Please don't misunderstand me, I don't want to disrespect you at all. It's that I am so confused about this thing for now.

I don't recall editing this mans article. I have no opinion on this issue on top of my head. If you could give the articles link I can give you a healthier response. --Cool Cat My Talk 22:09, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Call to Action

Whereas, much good discussion and work has previously occured on the Barnstar and award proposal page,

Whereas, the level of discussion and progress on the abovementioned page has dropped to a record level of none; no constructive commments have been made on existing awards since May 17, 2005,

Whereas, many "Vote or Die!" have been left open, namely two, as a result of this lack of discussion,

Whereas, nine proposals lie untouched by Wikipedian hands,

Whereas, you have previously commented and helped on the abovementioned page,

Therefore, I, who have absolutely no command in ordering this whatsoever, instruct you, とある白い猫, to return to the barnstar commitment and further the creation of Wikipedian awards; vote liberally and spread your constructive comments.

(Signed) Cmd. Bratschetalk 5 pillars of the Barnstarium Army, 03:22, Jun 8, 2005 (UTC)

p.s. And I hope you come back-b

I dont enjoy leaving wikipedia but users keep harrasing me. Their edits concentrate on reverting my edits only. No one so far have taken the mesures to stop this.
  • When I give govermental data thats pov because "governments have been known to lie" [1] some sane looking reverts dont quite have a basis. They are an expert on any and every issue I write.
  • If they could make Star Trek POV they would. Which is the only thing they havent interfered.
  • Even for articles I wrote such as Ranks and insignia of NATO Armies was bad [2]. I was "abusing" templates. I can go on forever.
In sum its pointless for me to edit wikipedia. They find ways to bother me. They are obsessed with my edits. Their lack of edits rather than reverts is the living proof of this. Two users work together and get involved in revert wars in almost any article I edit. They have 6 reverts while I have 3. There always is a concensus against me by the same users on almost any article I touch. --Cool Cat My Talk 21:31, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Wow, that's terrible. You seem like a dedicated editor and decent person; why are these users targeting you? I hate to see people leave this great project just because some jerks are ganging up. If you would like me to mediate or something, I'd be happy to. Bratschetalk 5 pillars 21:41, Jun 9, 2005 (UTC)
I am not really sure. My theory is: my "futile" attempt to NPOVise Armenian Genocide. I requested sources so that my counterpart prooves genocide etc... I asked him to use sources that are not specilised with the event only. You know standard stuff... It wasnt a very pleasant discussion overall. Their edits are on average minor things, which is fine, aside form that they revert me, the less I edit the less I get reverted obvliously. They keep reverting untill I "give up" no discussing in talk at all. Meanwhile I write entier articles. I dont know what you can do to stop their obsession with me. I dont want regular users in the crosfire as they may do what they do to me to you as well. Admins on the other hand can handle any harrasment like I recieved better. They wont intimidate me with their harrasment. But its rather pointless me to write anything as everything I write is pov, regardless of its contents quite frequently. Its just one revert war after another. --Cool Cat My Talk 22:07, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • You know what? I've found that editing contreversial articles isn't worth my time; the stress and toll it takes on me does not equal any work done, or any satisfaction found. My suggestion is, forget about the Armenian article altogether, and go do some RC patrol to get your stress level done. Nothing like good old work! Anything else, feel free to get on my talk page. Cheers, Bratschetalk 5 pillars 01:29, Jun 12, 2005 (UTC)
    Ture, but now any article I touch becomes contraversial. I have POV disputes with the same individuals on any article I go. Such as PKK, I am supposed to cite sources and yet I am supposed to "not discard the work of others out of hand". I am required to accept everyone elses work without them citing sources. Look at any POV dispute I have its with the same two idiots. --Cool Cat My Talk 10:01, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Sorry to hear about this

I'm sorry to hear about your disillusionment with Wikipedia. I think you are a valuable contributor, I would rather have you around. On the other hand, it isn't important enough in the grand scheme of things that is should cost you that much stress. Wish you all the best, whatever path you take. Guettarda 16:59, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I dont enjoy leaving wikipedia but users keep harrasing me. Their edits concentrate on reverting my edits only. No one so far have taken the mesures to stop this.
  • When I give govermental data thats pov because "governments have been known to lie" [3] some sane looking reverts dont quite have a basis. They are an expert on any and every issue I write.
  • If they could make Star Trek POV they would. Which is the only thing they havent interfered.
  • Even for articles I wrote such as Ranks and insignia of NATO Armies was bad [4]. I was "abusing" templates. I can go on forever.
In sum its pointless for me to edit wikipedia. They find ways to bother me. They are obsessed with my edits. Their lack of edits rather than reverts is the living proof of this. Two users work together and get involved in revert wars in almost any article I edit. They have 6 reverts while I have 3. There always is a concensus against me by the same users on almost any article I touch. --Cool Cat My Talk 21:31, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

WP:RFC

I have removed your RFCs against Davenbelle and Stereotek because you didn't create a subpage for explaining and discussing the problem. If you still think a RFC is appropriate, please examine some existing RFCs to see how this is done. See Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Example user. Yours, Radiant_>|< 09:10, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC)

Thanks that makes me very happy. --Cool Cat My Talk 09:24, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • I should point out you haven't cited any evidence, nor any applicable policies, nor have you found anyone to certify the basis of the dispute. Honestly, after reading your text, I still don't have a clue as to what's going on here. Radiant_>|< 10:48, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:とある白い猫&oldid=15147061"