Jump to content

User talk:DrZoidberg/Archive2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< User talk:DrZoidberg

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jondel (talk | contribs) at 02:30, 17 June 2005 (→Emergency). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Wikipedia:Sandbox

Great work patrolling the s/box. But when you re-instate the {{sandbox}} notice please also type <!--WARNING!! CHANGING THIS LINE COULD GET YOU BLOCKED FROM EDITING!!--> which puts a notice there which is only visible when editing the page. Thanks,--[[User:Gabriel Webber|Gabriel (mad scientist) 17:12, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Maybe a friendlier message would be in order. A STERN WARNING IN ALL CAPS MIGHT SCARE AWAY POTENTIAL WIKIPEDIANS. Maybe something like <!-- Please do not edit this line--> DrZoidberg 17:17, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Yes, maybe. But if people get the impression that there are no rules then... Anyway, if I see the {{sandbox}} notice there with no warning, or it not there ata ll, I will put my line there. Also, please either reply on my talk page by clicking here or let me know there that you've replied here. Thanks,--[[User:Gabriel Webber|Gabriel Webber (babble were rig) 17:49, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Well, there's almost always someone patrolling the sandbox. When that header disappears it is usually put back within a few minutes anyway. Besides, isn't the sandbox supposed to be a no rules place? DrZoidberg 19:43, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Just as a side note, there is now a template {{subst:sandboxpaste}} that pastes <noinclude>{{Please leave this line alone (template sandbox heading)}}<!-- * Welcome to the template sandbox! * * Please leave this part alone * * The page is cleared regularly * * Feel free to try your editing skills below * ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■--></noinclude>. – ABCD 22:46, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Atlas Award

Atlas Award
Atlas Award

You are hereby awarded the Atlas Award for your work in keeping the sand clean, and ensuring the sandbox remains a useful resource to all newcomers. You are entitled to display the award prominently, and are encouraged to award it to other deserving editors who have likewise raked the sand clean. Thank you! JRM 22:34, 2004 Dec 2 (UTC)

  • YAY!! *does a happy dance* DrZoidberg 16:32, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Sandbox

Hello. Two things:

  • Is it necessary for you to put extremely odd comments in the sandbox, for example "the sandbox tastes funny" and "no, reply on my talkpage"? It is just odd, and adds to my work in clearing out every now and then. Yo may see my edits with the summary "clearout", well, that's them.
  • Do you have any other aims on Wikipedia than to play in the sandbox, whether you're doing useful jobs or not? All of your edits are either there, or the Village Pump edits, which were about the sandbox anyway?

On a note about your idea about a sandbox namespace, that is quite a good idea, however. Did you know that there is also a Wikipedia:Test and Wikipedia:Test area I think.--[[User:Gabriel Webber|Gabriel (please reply on my talkpage!!) 17:42, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)

    • I like playing in the sandbox! Weird comments are fun!! DrZoidberg 17:54, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)
    • And, many of my edits are fixing things like the sandbox header, and getting rid of inappropriate content. So I am useful!!!!!! YAY! DrZoidberg 17:58, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)
I know you like doing weird comments, but, to be honest, I find them exceptionally irritating. They're not amusing, they're not... So please, please stop. And finally, where my signature says to reply on my talkpage, then do that, please.--[[User:Gabriel Webber|Gabriel (please reply on my talkpage!!) 17:16, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
My edits are not offensive. Some people find them amusing, some find them irritating. That's the nature of Wikipedia, I guess... And what's wrong with my talkpage? Is it infected with a virus? Or is it under attack by green cows? AAAHHHH! WE'RE ALL GOING TO DIE!! DrZoidberg 17:58, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)
No offence, but I must say that I am getting more and more annoyed with you. What on earth are you gibbering about green cows? Your comments are amazingly irritating, and I have personally asked you t stop. And, although you said on my talkpage just now that you replied there, you did not. Please do not lie. I expect a reply to this, without any silly comments on my talkpage pretty soon.--[[User:Gabriel Webber|Gabriel (please reply on my talkpage!!) 19:07, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Oh, you wanted a meaningful reply... Oops :-) DrZoidberg 19:09, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
For God's sake reply on my talkpage with a sensible answer. If you don't, I'm going to make a formal complaint about you.--[[User:Gabriel Webber|Gabriel (please reply on my talkpage!!) 08:07, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Stop teasing Gabriel, Zoidy. He's just trying to do a serious job here. If he wants you to reply on his talk page, humor him, and don't annoy him with off-the-wall comments just because you can.
For the record: it is customary to go back-and-forth in discussion (Gabriel posts on your page, you reply on his, he goes back to you...) That way, everyone is notified by the "you have new messages" header. Really, it's the only way to fly. JRM 13:21, 2004 Dec 12 (UTC)

Talk page discussions

See? Much easier that way. And don't you know that if people end their sentences with two exclamation marks, they expect to be heard!! So always reply on the right talkpage!!!! :-) JRM 17:05, 2004 Dec 13 (UTC)

Sandbox

Post all the nonsense you like in the Sandbox, but please not complete HTML pages or suchlike. I don't know how it looks on your end, but over here the thing becomes unreadable. The Sandbox is a feature for newbies—it shouldn't look intimidating or uneditable or they'll go away and vandalize something. Not good. Try making your entries look like regular articles somewhat, so people can get an idea for editing. I have horrible memories of the WACKA! vandal, who just posted a few thousand copies of the word WACKA! to the Sandbox. This made the page 3 megabytes long, and completely inaccessible. I don't want a repeat of that, or something that even remotely resembles it. Keep the Sandbox open for editing by anyone, please. JRM 22:20, 2004 Dec 13 (UTC)

Hangman in the sandbox

In your edit summary you said please wait until the game's finished, but...it's the sandbox, where people can do what they like. You said so yourself. So I will not wait until the game's finished, and PLEASE REPLY ON MY TALKPAGE.--[[User:Gabriel Webber|Gabriel (please reply on my talkpage!!) 17:12, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Yes, but I'll just keep on taking it out again. I'm just going to have my dinner now, but I will come back straight away to keep on removing it. After all...people can do what they like in the sandbox, can't they!! You said so yourself.--[[User:Gabriel Webber|Gabriel (please reply on my talkpage!!) 17:17, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Good question!! I'd say a bit of both. I'm reducing the content of the s/box, and making look less like something which you don't touch unless you take part in the game, and I'm trying to show you that your comments about the sandbox being completely flexible are double-edged.--[[User:Gabriel Webber|Gabriel (please reply on my talkpage!!) 17:36, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
You are asking me to be courteous...and I am refusing. I am being deliberately pedantic to show that your comments were ridiculous. I admit it. And, I will continue to be pedantic until you stop putting that hangman back. Just for once, I'm going to teach you a lesson.--[[User:Gabriel Webber|Gabriel (please reply on my talkpage!!) 17:40, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Look at the vandalism page and you'll find that I am there, you are there, and User:Kyrin is there. Please put a full explanation of your side there, I've already done mine.--[[User:Gabriel Webber|Gabriel (please reply on my talkpage!!) 18:02, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Not quite new: I put someone ther once for mucking up the header. But, please put a FULL explanation of your actions there,not just "oh gosh i was playing hangman im sorry" (I know it's supposed to have an apostrophe, it's irony).--[[User:Gabriel Webber|Gabriel (please reply on my talkpage!!) 18:06, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
OK, Kyrin's put his/her side in the WP:VIP, now it's your turn.--[[User:Gabriel Webber|Gabriel (please reply on my talkpage!!) 18:10, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)

We need a new string for this now

Yes, OK, humanity will be enslaved... Now, put your report on that page, please.--[[User:Gabriel Webber|Gabriel (please reply on my talkpage!!) 18:12, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Sorry to be tyrannical, but I won't stop pestering you until you put a FULL report on WP:VIP.--[[User:Gabriel Webber|Gabriel (please reply on my talkpage!!) 18:14, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
I'm now going to classify your useless, loony comments on my talkpage as vandalism. Now write that report or I'm going to request arbitration against you.--[[User:Gabriel Webber|Gabriel (please reply on my talkpage!!) 18:19, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
You have until half-past six by my signature before to write the report.--[[User:Gabriel Webber|Gabriel (please reply on my talkpage!!) 18:20, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
I know perfectly well how to use my browser. You haven't put a report there, you've put two sentences that don't stick to the point. I want to see four or five lines of proper, to-the-point text by half-past.--[[User:Gabriel Webber|Gabriel (please reply on my talkpage!!) 18:23, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC) PS:I'm not a teacher.
Three or four lines. I'm waiting. When you produce three or four lines of text, similar to my own

OK - here's my side. Firstly, a newbie would not get scared away: if they're a newbie they wouldn't know about the edit history so they wouldn't know about the reversion war. See User talk:DrZoidberg for my explanation of things, and various bits on User talk:Gabriel Webber (you may have to look at the archives). I am notifying the other users of this, and will ask them to also put their side of things.

...and I promise to be satisfied when I see it.

Next string

Time almost up, I think. I'll request arbitration first thing tomorrow if it's not done.--[[User:Gabriel Webber|Gabriel (please reply on my talkpage!!) 18:30, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Vandalism

Any chance you could remove the invitation to vandalism from your User page? When people put their vandalistic language into their edit summaries, it looks ad on Recent changes, and has led to people being blocked for it till it was determined that they were just following your invitation. RickK 22:58, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)

  • But with my message people will vandalize my user page instead of real articles! Isn't that a good thing? DrZoidberg 03:41, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Only if they quit including their obscenities in the edit summaries. RickK 22:51, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)

Hangman

Please don't start with the silly comments again. I didn't mention Homer in my edit to the sandbox. I'm not kidding though about the subpages: if you want to do hangman and do it on one of those pages, and put a note on the sandbox to say where the game's moved to, I promise not to interfere. But having the game on the sandbox does make it look like people have to join in the game, or don't edit, and as you [hopefully] know, that is not the case.--[[User:Gabriel Webber|Gabriel (please reply on my talkpage!!) 17:49, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)

What you just said proves my point. More and more people are doing it, so it needs a place of it's own. I've made an offer, take it or leave it. Also, look at my talkpage at the bottom of where you finished editing it yesterday and you'll find an anon's comment on the matter. You may find it interesting.--[[User:Gabriel Webber|Gabriel (please reply on my talkpage!!) 17:55, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
You want to leave it? Fine. Now, you can't complain that I keep removing your game, because I offered, basically, to stop doing it and you said no. If there are many people playing the game, and just one person clearing up after them, then very simple probability (and I suggest you read that article very carefully) proves that it is more likely that the players are causing conflicts rather than me. Also, nobody has played anyway, for a while. The offer is still open, by the way. Thankyou so much,--[[User:Gabriel Webber|Gabriel (please reply on my talkpage!!) 18:02, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
I don't complain about you putting the game there. I reccomend that you don't, but I don't complain. What I complain about is your protesting. If the sandbox is a free zone, I can do what I like as well. The fact is, I don't mind taking it away, but you do mind it being taken away. I have made suggestions, and it is in your best interests to follow them. Q.E.D (or QED, I'm not sure which the article is).--[[User:Gabriel Webber|Gabriel (please reply on my talkpage!!) 18:06, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
OK, it's a deal. I will continue to remove your game (and freely admit that I will make a special effort to do so) if it's in the sandbox, but will not touch it if it's in some sort of sub-page, or a Wikipedia:Games or such like. I will also not touch a short note in the sandbox (with no silly comments in it) saying where the game is. I will take it that you accept my conditions...although if I can do whatever I want that's not a point. Thankyou so much (sarcastic),--[[User:Gabriel Webber|Gabriel (please reply on my talkpage!!) 18:13, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
You are just trying to string this out. What objection do you have to creating a page just for this game? Answer: you don't. You just want a nice argument with me. So, I am going to ignore any further comments you put on my talkpage, and if I see the hangman again I will, of course, delete it if it's in the sandbox.--[[User:Gabriel Webber|Gabriel (please reply on my talkpage!!) 18:17, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
I've put a note about where to play hangman on the sandbox header, so it will be there full time now.--[[User:Gabriel Webber|Gabriel (please reply on my talkpage!!)
Well, the note is there, so tough luck if no-one's playing. And...the sandbox is not closed for repairs.--[[User:Gabriel Webber|Gabriel (please reply on my talkpage!!)

Hangman2

Let's not start that again. If people don't play, tough. They know where to go, so they obviously don't want to. And for that you cannot blame me. And...let's not buy a tarpaulin.--[[User:Gabriel Webber|Gabriel (please reply on my talkpage!!)

It's quite hard work playing hangman on a Wiki, with edit conflicts and so on. If they play with all those hardships, one more click isn't likely to bother them if they really want to play. QED.--[[User:Gabriel Webber|Gabriel (please reply on my talkpage!!) 15:38, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
I'm not debating it. If I see hangman in the sandbox I will remove it. There's nothing I can do about it. And, while you may find your mad remarks amusing, I don't and I doubt others do either. If you live in Winnipeg, as one of your comments implied, it must be a great shame for you, living in a town with no lunatic asylum.--[[User:Gabriel Webber|Gabriel (please reply on my talkpage!!) 15:45, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
I don't play hangman on Wikipedia because it has nothing to do with keeping an encyclopedia correct and up-to-date, the task of all Wikipedians. I have no objection to your playing it out of the sandbox.--[[User:Gabriel Webber|Gabriel (please reply on my talkpage!!)
Tough. And don't put multiple sandbox headers in: it takes ages to load. I know you can do what you want, but I am specifically asking you not to, since you spend all your time there it affects you more than me.--[[User:Gabriel Webber|Gabriel (please reply on my talkpage!!) 15:54, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
And, don't you dare starting monopoly in the sandbox. Make a subpage if necessary. Do not put my name into it, or I will be compelled to break this rule.--[[User:Gabriel Webber|Gabriel (please reply on my talkpage!!)

Gabriel Webber vs. the mad scientist round 4

OK. If you made proper edits to articles I wouldn't revert them. And, if they were purely to clean up the sandbox I wouldn't delete them. But they're not, and they're not.--[[User:Gabriel Webber|Gabriel (please reply on my talkpage!!) 15:59, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Please don't put silly comments in the sandbox.--[[User:Gabriel Webber|Gabriel (please reply on my talkpage!!)
...another may not. ie. they may think it's silly, and this applies to the current case. Silly may be a vague word, but you know perfectly well what I mean.--[[User:Gabriel Webber|Gabriel (please reply on my talkpage!!) 17:44, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
I have just looked over your "game" of monopoly,a nd found that you did mention my name despite my asking you not to. I have complained to an administrator (whose name I won't tell you yet) and I will await results.--[[User:Gabriel Webber|Gabriel (please reply on my talkpage!!) 17:55, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)

{{sandbox}}

As you know, I put hangman in the sandbox header, and someone else put Wheel of Fortune and Monopoly. An admin has removed them. Just thought you'd want to know.--[[User:Gabriel Webber|Gabriel (internal ID number: 118170) 11:13, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Hijacked?

It would seem that someone's hijacked your account, and is posting massive browser fuckups on the sandbox from it. - Cymydog Naakka 21:20, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)

No, it's just what Zoidy does for fun. I think we've talked about this before; this is only fun for you, and not for everyone else testing in the sandbox. Please don't bite the newcomers. Wikipedia is not your personal playground. We forgive newbies for doing this because they don't know any better and have yet to learn their way around the system. I don't think that excuse applies to you. Play nice, OK? JRM 22:22, 2005 Jan 19 (UTC)

Sandbox, Once Again

Sir, I would like for you to quit what you are doing to the Sandbox. I have reverted several of the things you have done to it. With the same points mentioned above, many new Wikipedia users will get lost due to the Sandbox being filled with text few can read. So, I ask you kindly, sir, that you quit that stuff and I will leavc you alone. Zscout370 20:03, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Ignore this shit, keep on being a badass ninja, yo.

  • WOOT! Big mess, coming up! DrZoidberg 15:57, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Sandbox (I am Gabriel Webber)

I am who was the above user. If you carry on mucking up the sandbox, I'll put you on the WP:VIP. Reply here.--212.100.250.215 16:05, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)

  • GABE!! You're back!! We missed you! DrZoidberg 18:09, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I'm not back. I'm just informing you of my identity. I'm warning you.--83.138.189.75 05:55, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)


A new sandbox!!

Hello, please create your own sandbox at User:DrZoidberg/Sandbox or User:DrZoidberg/'''anything''' for that matter. You can put in anything you want in there, however silly, and have fun all day long. Besides, the admins won't get mad. Leaving the main sandbox alone at Wikipedia:Sandbox would be a great idea. The admins don't like it when you put silly stuff in there, so you can try your own sandbox! -- Stevey7788 03:19, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)


Why is there soo much fuss about the sandbox?Anybody can put anything there, especially just for fun! It shouldn' be a big deal. --Jondel 06:50, 2 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page

Something strange has happened to your user page. Righteous Monkey 05:25, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Sandbox - final warning

You place large amounts of text in the sandbox again...

YOU ARE A SHARK!!!

Why did you put that in the sandbox? Researchers from Afghanistan headed by Drocter Osama bin Laden have proven that you're a shark professor with a PhD degree in SHARK attacks!!! Righteous Monkey 06:01, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)

  • I know you are but what am I? DrZoidberg 06:22, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • You're a dangerous, sharp-toothed, no-brained, sexy shark! Righteous Monkey 06:31, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
      • I know you are but what am I? DrZoidberg 06:35, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Personal Attacks

I know you must be getting tired of me, but calling User:Fonzie Fan a dork constitutes a personal attack against the user. Please, do not put things like that in Wikipedia again. Thanks. Zscout370 (talk) 18:10, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

  • That still doesn't explain why you ate all my soap! DrZoidberg 22:28, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Blocked

You are now blocked 48 hours from the time you logged in. You are blocked for doing the following things:

  • Personal attacks
  • Placing large amounts of text in the sandbox
  • Failing to give reasonable replies to users' complaints. For example...
    • "That still doesn't explain why you ate all my soap."
    • "I know you are but what am I?"
    • "*bite*"
    • "Or is it under attack by green cows"
  • Using the sandbox for purposes other than testing

Anyway, since you have not one of your 764 edits has been constructive (only stupid comments or comments attempting to defend your outrageous activities in the sandbox other than edits to the sandbox), you shouldn't care about being blocked. WP isn't here just so people like you can play in the sandbox, it's for people to pool their knowledge. You haven't edited any encyclopedic articles, and I doubt you've looked at any. You will just keep getting blocked if you re-start behaving badly after your block.

DrZoidberg, if you want to play in the sandbox, please don't abuse it like putting large quantities of text in it. Playing in the sandbox is fine, but don't overdo it. When people ask you questions, reply decently and make them look like you're not nuts. — Stevey7788 (talk) 05:27, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • OK, I'm going to give this "not nuts" concept a try... I am not putting large amounts of text in the sandbox. Please inquire with User:Fonzie Fan if you are looking to solve this problem. Although User:Fonzie Fan does make humorous contributions to the sandbox, so don't block him or anything. ZSDERW FLRMSMG GRABBLE!! 0010. 11010001? 0100100110! DrZoidberg 12:37, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

With all due respect (ie. none) you are still nuts. Even more so actually - anyone who effectively says "I am not going to do anything stupid: ZSDERW FLRMSMG GRABBLE!! 0010. 11010001? 0100100110!" is mad.

Message from My Mommy

File:Gregorstrasser.jpg
Dear Mr. Zoid,
My momma thinks that you have been a bad boy. Maybe if you become a good little boy, you can even become just like me.
Gregor Strasser

But Mr. Gregor Strasser is there watching you, so watch out!!!--Jondel 08:33, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting the sandbox

YOU ARE AN IDIOT.

Deleting the sandbox is a stupid idea. People would just create more new nonsense pages or vandalise articles. Why do you want to create more work for people? You don't deal with vandalism, so why encourage others to create it? Also, since you only exist to edit the sandbox, what would you do? At the moment, you are the most annoying person I can imagain, let alone have met, but if you start moving your stupidity into wider areas than the sandbox, G-d help us.--212.100.250.218 17:27, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Comment only. Guys, nobody is asking you or paying you to clean up. Besides theres a clean up bot. Why not focus on contributing, writing articles? Write about your hometown, bigfoot, UFOS, whatever. Most important, have fun!There are thousands and oceans of potential articles. And contributing may help society by building its pool of knowledge. Besides there more annoying people like trolls who are Vfd/delete-happy . And Dr Zoidberg, do contribute something notable , please.--Jondel 08:31, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Zoidberg

I think we are giving DrZoidberg a little bit too much of a hard time. I believe that DrZoidberg will never contribute to any article, but I think he adds a lot of fun to the sandbox. Sure, he may be annoying (not as much as Fonzie Fan though!), but we shouldn't be putting so much pressure on him. Let's practice some civility here on Wikipedia. However, I do want him to write serious replies on talk pages, not nonsense and jokes.

Also, DrZoidberg, please write serious comments on talk pages that make sense, or you'll create some hard times for yourself. Trust me. — Stevey7788 (talk) 04:48, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Emergency

Are you a doctor? We require your expertise here.--Jondel 01:22, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

  • Please state the nature of your medical sausages. DrZoidberg 01:47, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Well the sausage in question flew out of my nose as I sneezed and appeared to go into cardiac arrest. And so I applied a defibrillator. I'm thinking of feeding it to the dog though.--Jondel 02:30, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DrZoidberg/Archive2&oldid=15325600"