User talk:AceYYC
I assume you took this image? Can you mention that on the image page? Burgundavia (✈ take a flight?) 03:42, May 30, 2005 (UTC)
COTW Project
You voted for Roaring Twenties, this week's Collaboration of the week. Please come and help it become a featured-standard article. Falphin 03:35, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
Cricket
Why did you make this change? There has been a long consensus that this line can stay, so why did you just introduce a self-reference? smoddy 20:20, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- I just happened to have removed the template and fixed the redirect. Phoenix2 20:21, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Great, sorry to have leapt down your throat. smoddy 20:41, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- I really don't understand what that huge argument is about, but only the basis of the template is there and it does take you to the Portal:Cricket page. Phoenix2 20:44, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- I can't say I understand it either. At first glance, your change was reminiscent of a change by another editor that resulted in a major edit war, so I hope I can be forgiven for my assumptions. smoddy 20:52, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- I didn't understand that there was controversy surrounding the issue until a moment afterwards, but I can say that this will not result in an edit war because I didn't really have a problem with the page the way it was, I just like the consistent look of that template. Phoenix2 20:55, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- I can't say I understand it either. At first glance, your change was reminiscent of a change by another editor that resulted in a major edit war, so I hope I can be forgiven for my assumptions. smoddy 20:52, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- I really don't understand what that huge argument is about, but only the basis of the template is there and it does take you to the Portal:Cricket page. Phoenix2 20:44, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Great, sorry to have leapt down your throat. smoddy 20:41, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Peer review on IFK Göteborg
Hi, as you're both a native English speaker and interrested in football (soccer...), I'd be very happy if you could help on peer reviewing the IFK Göteborg article at Wikipedia:Peer review/IFK Göteborg. I've got some input on the article already, but we would be happy to see anyone that knows football to review it also. It would be great I you could take a look at the comments and at the article if you have got time over. -- Elisson | Talk 22:35, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Yes, I could help with peer reviewing this article. Phoenix2 01:22, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
You added a cleanup to this page. I've attempted to do that. Do you have any further concerns about the article? --agr 19:28, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Nope, it looks good. The notice can be removed. There were just some minor grammar/style things. Phoenix2 19:29, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Antarctic krill
thanks for your comment, Phoenix2, I moved images out but others moved them back in - hallo to fine Canada - Uwe Kils 18:37, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC)
- Before long, I'll vote in Template:Support for the article. Phoenix2 18:39, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- that would be great - we do everything to promote this mystic critter - may I ask you to help with the language in our article about eel reproduction (I am German and know my English is rotten) Uwe Kils
18:42, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC)
- I'll comment on the eel article on its talk page. Phoenix2 18:43, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- that would be great - we do everything to promote this mystic critter - may I ask you to help with the language in our article about eel reproduction (I am German and know my English is rotten) Uwe Kils
Support and Object
Hi - I've seen you using Template:Support and Template:Object - is there anything wrong with good old fashioned Support and Object? -- ALoan (Talk) 21:45, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Not really, I thought that they looked a little prettier, but now that you mention that they would slow down Wikipedia {{Support}} and {{Oppose}}/{{Object}} will be no more! Also, thanx for the comments at peer review about List of rivers by length. Phoenix2 22:37, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)