Jump to content

User talk:Miranda

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by R Delivery Bot (talk | contribs) at 02:31, 27 September 2007 (Signpost delivery). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

<br=clearall>

User talk:Real96/header

Admin

I've noticed in the history of pages you revert edits and identify them as vandalism a lot, even though sometimes they are just good faith. That's why you won't be an admin either, because you think you can boss other users around and say things are vandalism even when they aren't(sometimes). See here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Melina_Perez&diff=159084390&oldid=159082790 .... you identify that as vandalism? That is good faith and even if it isn't it certainly isn't vandalism. Administrators can correctly identify vandalism, and since it would seem you can't that's why you won't be one. Wwefan980 18:22, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

By the way I'm not an admin hopeful which is why I don't care if I am one. Wwefan980 18:22, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

First, assume good faith when bringing up a new topic on my talk page. Comments such as "you can boss other users around" and "administrators can correctly identify vandalism...and since it seem you can't" is kind of assuming bad faith about my contributions to the project. Second, in order to edit the encyclopedia, you have to follow the rules and guidelines of the project, mainly outlined in the five pillars. Second, the subject of the topic is a living person. Living persons fall into the category of biographies of living persons, which states something to the effect of libelous and poorly sourced materials should be removed. Since the IP inserted the fact, I identified it as vandalism, because the fact was unsourced at the point and IMHO, considered to be original research. The IP, then noted that the source said the fact to be true according to the source. I have read the source of the article, and the fact of her "attention" is sourced in the article. M.(er) 07:22, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

lol ok. Wwefan980 13:15, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MedCab Case

I offered to mediate the current case you are involved in here. I would appreciate a response. Sincerely, --Тhε Rαnδom Eδιτor 03:15, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am okay with you mediating the case. However, I will no longer comment any further on the case since it is up to the organizations in question to determine whether the words "XXX Sorority/Fraternity, Incorporated" should be in the article. M.(er) 04:57, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I will wait for a response from the respective organizations, then I will comment on my points. M.(er) 04:59, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nehrams2020 RfA Thanks

Thank you for your participation in my RfA, which closed successfully with unanimous support. I appreciate you taking the time to stop by and vote and I can't wait to learn the new tools and further immerse myself into Wikipedia! Please don't hesitate to point out any errors I make so I can prevent them from occurring again. I'm always here to help, so if you ever need anything, just let me know. Also, thanks to Wizardman for nominating me and for guiding many other editors to become admins. Again, thank you and happy editing! --Nehrams2020 07:15, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Congrats. M.(er) 16:57, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fabrictramp RFA

Thank you for your support in my Request for Adminship, which passed with 50 supports, 1 neutral, and 1 oppose. My goal is to keep earning your trust every time I grab the "mop". (And I'm always open to constructive criticism and advice!) Again, thanks. --Fabrictramp 17:01, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats. M.(er) 16:59, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seth MacFarlane

Your quite welcome, I was glad to find these videos too, Unfortunately though it looks like the person who posted them on YouTube has unceremoniously removed them without even an explanation, I'll search YouTube again to see if they have been reposted or if someone else posted them. Simon Bar Sinister 09:13, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I watched both videos. Both were fantastic. M.(er) 17:00, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there

M, i didn't know you weren't feeling well. hope you are doing better... -RoBoTamice 18:50, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. M.(er) 00:02, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for September 24th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Volume 3, Issue 39 24 September 2007 About the Signpost
From the editor: Survey results
Wikimedia announces plans to move office to San Francisco WikiWorld comic: "Ambigram"
News and notes: Times archives, conferences, milestones Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. R Delivery Bot 02:31, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Miranda&oldid=160612204"