User talk:Shshshsh

Shahid is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Welcome to my talk page! Please leave a message and I will reply to you as fast as possible!:)

Archives

I've done some organization at Wikipedia:WikiProject Indian cinema it was a mess. I've created the notepad now and added a section for film article image requests on the actor image page we created before. I also added the nice Indian cinema icon. Now the notepad will need organization and bullet pointing concisely setting up a page for all the things that require attention for all of the articles withing Indian cinema. Are you OK with these changes? ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 16:59, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have discussed with Giro who does a lot of organizational work for WP Films and he like me thinks its time we standardized the cinema groups and took the Indian cinema group as part under our wing and part WP:India. At present it seems like many of the participants are inactive and unfortunately general Indian cinema project organization is suffering as a result despite the great work of its active members on certain articles. Now a move to Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Indian cinema task force would guarantee an increase in organization and would be closely monitored by Giro and msyelf and others who could then bat ome date in collaboration assess all Indian cinema articles and try to ensure even covergage of all. . It would create a stable framework and not alienate the group but would be working with overall film project goals of which Indian cinema is undeniably a part of. It would also be a part of the WP:India group natually. Now I need some support in this -I promise a move will strongly enhance the cinema group organization and it would still function the same. Please let me know if you agree asap thanks ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 17:28, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tu español es excellente amigo. Y gracias . Quiero aprender hablar y escribir español con fluidez en el futuro. You support the restructuring then? It can only bring solidarity to film and bio articles related to Indian cinema and it will create more interest in the project and encourage active members of films to check it out and try to contribute . There would soon enough be a drive to assess all articles and work at developing everything in coordination with our goals . ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 17:43, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It wouldn't affect the projects uniqueness. As it is the project is alienated and the 400 or so editors at WP Films can't really get in to attempt to assess them. It is still exactly the same. I appreciate your love of Indian cinema as the best but do you want better organization or not? The seperate group hasn't really got any form of article assessment it didn't even have any mention of the top articles until a minute ago ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 18:26, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Of course it would copy the same version -it would be exactly the same!! . It would be exactly the same pages just under WP:Films assessment to coordinate it better ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 18:29, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've stated what I think on the talk page as you asked me what I thought . Yow!! Boohooo.Sob sob. Lois Maxwell who played Mish Moneypenny died. ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 21:31, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I found an image for Deepika Padukone -another hottie ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 11:11, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm uploading another she is such a beauty as Stven Irwin would have siad . This Bollywood blog thing is treasure trove - I managed to negotiate again with the site to remove some of the watermarks on many of their images -this is why there now are some more clear available although many still have it on ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 11:19, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See Category:Images from Bollywood Blog. Its looking terrific. our Bollywood gallery. Excellent work on the new article. You really show your strengths when you create new articles also. I've just been doing some work on Israel ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 15:39, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You know with some references and expansion perhaps on production we could get Deewangee up to DYK. Its a damn good start ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 16:22, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have an older film request. For some reason Benaam (1974 film) is redirecting to the 2007 remake. It needs an article. I believe it star Amitabh Bachan ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 17:10, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry mate but it isn't at all. The lists are supposed to mention the main characters or most prominent in the film. Any mention of the key cast members is useful and Pa is doing a great job. Please don't ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 18:19, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The most important thing is that even the titles are put into the lists but if it has info this is evne better to start with. At a later date more actors can be added if relevant but it is off to a good start. Don't worry if the details on actors are not fully complete yet - it is far more important the films are added to the lists . Regards ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 18:22, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well for instance Die Hard 3. Now who are the main characters - Would you say it is POV for Bruce Willis to be mentioned as a main character? From the many clips of Bollywood films from the 1970s particular the Romance films often there were two or three main characters -often these people were featured on the poster of film as they were central to the story. If for some reason soembody vandalised it because it was missing two or three actors then I'm sure it would be reverted soon enough. Ideally the lists should mention four to five actors but different films often have a differing number of central characters. ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 18:33, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now hang on. Are you talking about the introduction or the actors of each film in the tables. I thought you were talking about the number of actors mentioned in the tables for each films ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 18:42, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I thought you were talking about the number of cast mentioned for each film . DId you mean about mentioning actors in the introduction ? ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 18:45, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well? If you are talking about mentioning a few actors in intro for the whole decade then it can appear as POV and should perhaps not be in there - as of course there were many prominent actors . Are you talking about this? I thought you were on about the content in tables - please respond thanks ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 18:55, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah amigo. Ah well thats clears a lot of things up!!!! LOL!! To be honest I was a little confused - I was sure you were talking about how many actors should be mentioned in tables for each film!!! Pa did mention about writing a good intro - but its probably best not to mention the actors in thinking about it - POV at first didn't occur to me. As it is now its fine I think and is referenced. If you can think of anyhting else important than please add it. Hey did you really like Zora? I know he/she founded the Indian cinema group and proabably has done the greatest work in the past for the group - but from what I remember she was quite rude to many people. I know when I told her I was creating a list of missing films to help the project she snapped at me big time ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 19:13, 1 October 2007 (UTC).[reply]