Jump to content

User talk:TJ Spyke

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by BetacommandBot (talk | contribs) at 18:57, 10 October 2007 (your Non-Free image upload). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 7 days are automatically archived to User talk:TJ Spyke/Archive 13. Sections without timestamps are not archived.

Wii-only and Wii games

Even exclusive Wii games go in just one category. -- Dvorsky 08:29, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Really? But won't the category Wii games then be fast filled? I thought it's point in better sorting. MY mistake... -- Dvorsky 18:41, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know it won't be filled, but it's hard (jgb, neznam tu riječ XD) (here comes present continuous from menage) it... -- Dvorsky 05:05, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Extended PPV article - "Other-on screen talent" section

On the One Night Stand (2005) PPV article I noticed you inserted the Other-on screen talent section. As it is one of the "extended" (full report etc.) PPV articles, is this section really needed. Personally, I don't think it is needed, and in my view its "cruft" and deterioates the articles quality. I can understand why its on WrestleMania article, but in the extended PPV articles, the information is sufficiently covered in the main body. Do we really need the section - does it really add to the article in terms of quality? Davnel03 18:23, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would love to tackle Starrcade, only problem is is that I never watched WCW once! My reason. Because I was only five or six when those events happened!! Sorry! Why don't you try and do something in your sandbox and see where you get with it? Davnel03 16:01, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I can help you with the article if you wish? I have Eric Bischoff's Controversy Creates Cash book which gives a lot of info on Starrcade 1997 (or '98, can't remember the year). Davnel03 15:16, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cena

LOL, you must be watching ECW, I was just about to revert the 'vacated title' edit but you beat me to it. You're fast :-) Stormin' Foreman 02:06, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, I watch ECW live every week. TJ Spyke 02:08, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sweet Chin Music

Do you know when he actually started calling it that? From matches I've seen in 96, I only remember it being called the superkick :S TheHeartbreakKid15 21:00, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's true. But I remember he used at WrestleMania X in the Ladder Match on Razor and Vince and Lawler didn't even mention it. Also I think at Summerslam 96, it's only called a superkick as well TheHeartbreakKid15 20:20, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So...

Have you considered filing a deletion review, or starting an ANI thread about Alkivar's deletion of your subpage? You know you could take him to school with WP:COI. The Hybrid 05:11, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, and remember to mention that OR isn't a criterion for speedy deletion, and even if it were the general rules for articles don't apply to subspace in addition to the aforementioned Conflict of Interests. Tear him apart ;). Make sure that he has no ground to stand on. The Hybrid 06:36, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

One Night Stand

I understand that they have full articles, but you still include WWE One Night Stand 2007 in the article. If so, you should seperate that one too. 64.237.197.113 20:45, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you mentioned that you might be able to look through some of the references in this article to let me know which ones would stand up to a GA review. If you have a chance, I'd really appreciate it if you could do this. I did some more work today on the references, replacing a few and adding a second reference to some claims. I think it's getting close, but I think I need help just finding out what (if anything) still needs to be changed. GaryColemanFan 23:25, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:WrestlePalooza98.jpg

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:WrestlePalooza98.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:48, 6 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. KipSmithers T/C 00:48, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my userpage--AFUSCO 13:40, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin Steen and El Generico

notable because of their roh contract--KingMorpheus 23:33, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

try ppv--KingMorpheus 00:03, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ROH's 4th Untitle PPV

1) I didn't even noticed when you got rid of the "Matches" part and though I did that on acident, that's why it put it back in. 2) Have you been around long enough to learn how not to have an ego? Nenog 00:44, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

1)Sorry, I thought you were trying to force your way again (like when the Morishima title situation. 2)Yes, I am just trying to help you out by letting you know how we handle PPV article since i've been editing them since early 2006 and helped establish the standarized format we have (it used to be where each article was different based on the editors and were in general a complete mess). TJ Spyke 00:48, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wrestlemania (1985)

Hello, I have noticed that you are a frequent contributor to the many wrestling articles. I would like some assistance with the article on the first WrestleMania...do you know where I could find good sources about the build-up to it? I know of some things to look at, but want to know if you have any big recommendations. I would love to see the article on the first ever WrestleMania, to be promoted to a good article, or even a featured one. Thank you. FamicomJL 02:20, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, that's one thing I was specifically looking for. What sucks to me, is that the two MTV shows would be PERFECT sources, but they're so hard to find any information for on the internet and in tape trading. I'd do to message boards, but of course they're always the last place to have to look. I'm hoping Graham Cawthon's site (thehistoryofthewwe.com) lists in detail post match activites on the MTV shows, since those are all I'm really looking for. I know what happened, but I'd just need to source it all. FamicomJL 02:28, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Collaboration icon Hello! The Pro Wrestling Collaboration of the Week for October 6 - October 13 is N/A. Please help to improve it to match the quality of an ideal Wikipedia professional wrestling related article. The next article for collaboration will be chosen on Sunday, October 14.
Cast your vote to select the collaboration for next week! | Nominate an article that could be greatly improved!

You are receiving this notification because you are listed as a member of the Professional Wrestling WikiProject. If you no longer wish to receive this notice, then please add your name to this list.

Cyber Sunday 2007

I think the stickers are at least as notable as a tagline or a theme song, especially since they're going to be part of the fan voting which is the entire point of the PPV.«»bd(talk stalk) 22:58, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

i watched and recorded no mercy last night and wwe did not announce any matches. also they have not posted any matches on thier website.SpeedyC1 00:45, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Put the match, but put also when and where the oponent will be anounced. http://www.wwe.com/shows/cybersunday/exclusives/cyber1 Use this link]. --KingOfDX 04:14, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


List of Japanese N64 games

I noticed your one of the people that wished there to be a list of Japanese games online for Wikipedia which I tried to make for the Nintendo 64 a few months ago, but just like when they where added to the orginal List of Nintendo 64 games they are trying to delete the new page List of Japanese Nintendo 64 games here's a link Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Japanese Nintendo 64 games to the discussion, how about giving your view. (Floppydog66 16:13, 9 October 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Alkivar

Given you past history with Alkivar, you may wish to comment on this arbitration case. I'm about to throw in my two cents. Davnel03 15:06, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Resident Evil Umbrella.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Resident Evil Umbrella.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:31, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Armageddon 2000.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Armageddon 2000.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:57, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]