Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pat alton
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by CesarB (talk | contribs) at 16:57, 21 April 2005 (→[[Pat alton]]: non-admin closing; speedy deleted). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 16:57, 21 April 2005 by CesarB (talk | contribs) (→[[Pat alton]]: non-admin closing; speedy deleted)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was speedy deleted by SWAdair (Indisputable bad faith addition) --cesarb 16:57, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
{{{Not notable. Vanity. Delete}}}
- Speedy Delete I was going to do that but the VfD tag was alreadty there. It also looks like someone is having a problem seting up the VfD. Vegaswikian 22:05, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- It's this newfangled vfd shortcut routine. Driving me haywire. Feel free to speedy. -- 8^D BDAbramsongab 22:06, 2005 Apr 19 (UTC)
- Delete, not notable, vanity. Megan1967 05:42, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Speedily deleted. The deletion log shows it was deleted the same minute that the VfD tag was added (thus unknowingly recreating the article). I concur with the original deletion, and am deleting it again. Indisputable bad faith addition. SWAdair | Talk 06:23, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- I feel bad for having delayed the deletion this long!!! Sorry about that. -- 8^D BDAbramsongab 16:42, 2005 Apr 20 (UTC)
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.