Talk:2010 Australian federal election

This article was nominated for deletion on November 28, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

	Australia portal 2010 Australian federal election is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

This article should be AfD'd

Per other past examples, we should not be creating an article for election so far away. AfD? Timeshift (talk) 01:56, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was nominated; the result of the discussion can be seen at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Australian federal election, 2010. As you can see, the result was to keep the article. The article was renamed as a result of the discussion. -- Mattinbgn\^talk 01:58, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

At least some of the information (eg. footers) is duplicate of Elections in Australia. Merge? --Brendan [ contribs ] 02:30, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The footers are duplicate? That is the point of navigation templates, to link related articles together. -- Chuq (talk) 00:50, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As the link from Mattinbgn shows, there was an extremely thorough discussion as to what to do with the article, only about 3 weeks ago, and the result was keep. I don't think anything major has changed since then. About the only thing I can think of is that the date of the first sitting of the parliament is now known - this only makes the article more viable. -- Chuq (talk) 00:50, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Election campaigns can be up to 68 days/10 weeks...

Is it just too late and not reading the article correctly? Section 157 of the Electoral Act says: "The date fixed for the polling shall not be less than 23 days nor more than 31 days after the date of nomination."? Timeshift (talk) 16:10, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct; As it says at http://www.aph.gov.au/library/pubs/rn/2005-06/06rn04.htm "The time allowed from the expiry or dissolution of the House to polling day is therefore not less than 33 days and not more than 68 days." Barrylb (talk) 16:29, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Opening paragraph - dissolution or expiry

The next Australian federal election will elect members of the 43rd Parliament of Australia and must be held on or before April 16, 2011. The election will be called following the dissolution of the current Parliament.

This will almost certainly be the case. However, it will not necessarily be the case, and we’re not a crystal ball. Section 28 of the Constitution says: "Every H of R shall continue for 3 years from the first meeting of the House, and no longer, but may be sooner dissolved by the Governor-General". That is, the default position is that the house expires after 3 years, without any intervention. The GG can dissolve it earlier, and this has almost always been what has occurred – almost, but not quite. The 3rd Parliament first sat on 20 February 1907. It was never dissolved by the GG and it expired on 19 February 1910 [1].
It’s possible this could happen with the current parliament. We've giving 16 April 2011 as the last possible date of the election, which is correct, but the only way that day could be election day is if the parliament is not dissolved by the GG but continues for the full 3 years and expires on 12 February 2011 simply by the operation of s.28.
I’m changing the sentence to "The election will be called following the dissolution or expiry of the current Parliament". -- JackofOz (talk) 01:38, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm.. a few of the dates may be off by one, based on the 1907-1910 example. Article current says "first meet on February 12, 2008. Therefore it expires on February 12, 2011" but it looks based on the example above, it actually expires a day earlier. Barrylb (talk) 06:52, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]