Talk:Amon Amarth/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Lyrics

Why can't i find lyrics for Thor Arise anywhere? - Ultre

Because the band has not disclosed them, so no one knows them. Mushroom (Talk) 14:20, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Ack... and i failed miserably at deciphering them myself. Ultre 14:47, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

They seem to have had the lyrics taken down from several sites as well, so I'm assuming they would reques them taken down from here too. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Omicron91 (talk • contribs) 13:32, 10 January 2007 (UTC).

David Banis says they are viking death metal. Melodic death metal should not be a genre, it should only be used to characterize a death metal band. For example there are some black metal bands that are very melodic and some that are not, but melodic black metal should not be a genre to describe the ones that are melodic. The same is true for death metal. And times change, Amon Amarth has revamped viking metal into its own. This band is good enough at what it does to achieve that. No one else sounds like them. And no one should try to.

At this interview: http://www.themetalweb.com/amonamarthinterview.html , Johan states that Amon Amarth is a death metal band.

"Dawn/The Metal Web!: To set the record straight, how would you categorize "AMON AMARTH" musically? I’ve heard so many labels being put on the music from Death metal to Viking metal. Who would know better than the band themselves? (Laughs)

Johan Hegg: We play Death Metal. We write about Vikings so therefor some refer us to Viking metal, but I have no idea what that is. I can't imagine the Viking’s veer into metal at all except on the swords and stuff. And musically, I guess they only played these strange lip instruments and some bongos or whatever." —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.82.68.208 (talk) 23:47, 7 May 2007 (UTC).

Members

Why are they listed two times? --Dharion 08:50, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

I highly believe that Amon Amarth should be noted as Gods among men! Though that may slightly be a little fan P.O.V. :D

Genre

Calling Amon Amarth a viking metal band is incorrect. Although the lyrical content often involves Vikings, calling Amon Amarth viking metal would suggest that they are black metal instrumentally, while actually they are pure melodic death metal. I changed the description of the group from "viking metal/melodic death metal" to "melodic death metal with viking metal lyrics".

unrealshadow13

i agree. Amon Amarth do not play "Viking Metal" as it's meant to be. 84.170.196.152 01:15, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Viking metal is not just a part of black metal. Viking can also be death, melodeath, ect. +Johnson 06:07, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

I agree with those who would rather classify Amon Amarth as melodeath for the purposes of this article. While they do play music with viking themes, I've always seen viking metal described better as an off-shoot of black metal. Encyclopedia Metallum recognizes the viking metal genre, and lists Amon Amarth as melodeath. I won't revert the article, but I would like to see some change happen eventually. Gmrx 15:26, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

They should still be considered as Viking metal, since there live shows include the vocalist/singer drinking from a viking horn. Viking influences are obvious. Gronkmeister | ^Talk/ _Contrib 14:51, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Agreed. Definately Melodeath with Viking influences.

One of the best bands around though, no matter what the genre

Well, i agree music is very important but then it is equally necessary to classify them accordingly, Viking Metal IMO is the theme not a genre, to me Amon Amarth is a Melodic Death Metal band from Sweden which churned out some really different and wonderful bands which belong to Melo DM, honestly tagging them Viking in my opinion is not entirely right.

Please learn how to use talk pages. Out of place, and most posts unsigned. Fixed. - - 'twsx'talk'cont' 22:35, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

I'm not sure about "melodic death metal" I would argue that they are more of a Melodic Black Metal band, their style seems to fit far more with black metal than death metal. Shimbozy 18:16, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

I believe the biggest issue with Amon Amarth is they cannot fit into one category, similar to many other bands, although Viking Metal has truly expanded from its original defintiion as Black Metal with Viking influenced lyrics more or less, they have definately taken the genre and created a major dispute among people because of the fact that they not only fit into the genre of Viking Metal more than most other bands, but that they have also taken the genre and made it into their own, they classify themselves as Viking Metal on their website, which we know cannot always be true, just because your occasional metal magazine throws Linkin Park in there, doesn't make it so. If you read into the Wiki Article on Viking Metal you realize that whoever wrote it, really did have a more today intake on it, saying that the genre expanded from originally just Black Metal to other genres, in this case, Death Metal or Melodic Death Metal, but in the long run, it really shouldn't hurt to classify them as Metal, Melodic Death Metal, and Viking Metal.

SanctusAbMortis 02:49, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Amon amarth crusher.jpg

Image:Amon amarth crusher.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 17:27, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Amon AMarth.jpg

Image:Amon AMarth.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 17:27, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Expansion request

Could someone with an extensive knowledge of the band please increase this article?@ Judging by the scale of their notability in the musical world, this article should really be much bigger. I'd do it myself, but I have homework to do. :) Arkyopterix 21:04, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

move page

i've started a discussion on moving this page and Amon Amarth on the amon amarth talk page. if you have anything to say, say it here: amon amarth discussion ...Patrick (talk, cntrb.) 03:38, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Edit War: Dear Twsx and Dear Scipo,

Dear Twsx and Dear Scipo, May I remind you both not to get into an edit war, it's only a comma!! Please both of you Have a Nice cup of Tea and Sit Down The guidelines on the template page do not specify, however in the example on the template page shows the genres to be separated by commas and are all on the same line. PhilB ~ ^T/_C 20:02, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the invitation, but what do you want me to do here? Policy does not rule, but support commas and no linebreaks, so i fix infoboxes accordingly whenever i get across one of them. I am not aware of any edit war. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | 21:10, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, but User:Scipo appears to be undoing any number of your edits, it appears that you are right according to policy, but see his edit list, he is going through all the articles containing the music infobox and changing them to line breaks. PhilB ~ ^T/_C 21:14, 4 November 2007 (UTC) p.s. I hope I am making sense!

I am aware. Where do i fit in? (do not get me wrong, i am not nerved by you or this talk here, i am just trying to understand) ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | 21:20, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Two people continually undoing each others edits is called an edit war and is completley usless and time consuming

You keep doing the right thing; correcting infoboxes (on numerous articles) by deleting the line break and Scipo keeps undoing them,

However I think that (in accordance with WP:MUSTARD) the 'v' should be capitalized.

I was willing to discus first before asking for any administrator action, I propose getting administrator intervention while Request for Comment (which you posted) is in progress.

p.s. I am not very experienced on wikipedia, so I hope that I am doing the right thing! PhilB ~ ^T/_C 21:40, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

For the last time, User Twsx edits are unnessary dur to the fact that there is NO OFFICAL FORMAT. All he is doing is starting an edit war over a rule that dosn't exist. Scipo 23:46, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

I was about to make a point about your statement, but you kind of made it yourself.. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | 00:02, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Continued edit warring by User:Twsx

This user has continued to war on this page, changing line breaks to comma breaks in the infobox genre section. Wikipedia is built on consensus, yet it seems the user is ignoring the fact that he/ she is the only one who wants comma breaks and obviously has an agenda. Blizzard Beast ^$ODIN$ 18:38, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Many users, such as myself, User:Kameejl, User:CircafuciX and others have continually tried to keep the article in the correct condition, yet Twsx has seen it fit to continually revert at every turn. Blizzard Beast ^$ODIN$ 18:40, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

You are wrong about pretty much everything you said in those two comments. Such harassment, accusing someone of breaking a policy one does now even seem to understand. Oh I feel so hurt. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | 19:42, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

You were warned before by another user, Twsx, see previous section. Maybe you should take it into account. Kameejl ^(Talk) 20:06, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Oh, he's been warned a few times. Blizzard Beast ^$ODIN$ 23:09, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

With this one, twice actually. Both times without any reasoning, so I could gladly, or actually didn't have any other option but to ignore them. PS: You, Navnlos, might want to read WP:INDENT. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | 23:16, 3 December 2007 (UTC)