Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Totally Obvious
Appearance
Non-notable werbsite attempting to create notoriety by creating a Wikipedia entry EdwinHJ | Talk 20:49, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete See the text of the article if you need any more reason to support deletion of this page EdwinHJ | Talk 20:52, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete As above. KeithD 20:54, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete I think that "a blog that struggles for the wikipedic recognition it so clearly deserves" in the article is reason enough. MicahMN | Talk 20:58, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Obviously a joke in bad taste. --Madchester 21:06, July 18, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Nonsense, tries to promote the website. — Stevey7788 (talk) 21:14, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete joke/spam. --Etacar11 00:59, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete advertising for a non notable blog. JamesBurns 08:19, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, consider redirecting to Obvious. Radiant_>|< 10:47, July 19, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete - not notable - (Radiant, did you mean an article other than "Obvious"?) - Tεxτurε 17:48, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
- Don't Delete - not as notable or commercial as Fuji Rock Festival or Creative Zen perhaps, but it exists. And if you try to kill it, you'll only make it more obvious. -- A Partisan Reviewer (Unsigned vote by 66.18.140.124 (talk · contribs), user's third edit)
- Keep A banal observation for one can be a breakthrough epiphany for another. The concept of the obvious blog cannot be so easily digested in a simple glance, and an entry such as this will perhaps motivate a better understanding of such experimental texts for all people alike. KeepingMyMindOpen (Unsigned vote by 129.219.83.141 (talk · contribs), only edits to this page)
- Delete. Vanity/advertisement. Postdlf 22:04, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Vanity cruft. -- Karada 22:15, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
- Don't Delete - Interesting entry of a public forum. No harm in this . It may grow if left to it's own devices .Doalch 00.30 July 20, 2005 (GMT)
- First edit by Doalch (talk · contribs). --Etacar11 01:21, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
- Keep Non-notable is subjective, perhaps the blog is pseudo-notable verging on neo-notability. As for the charge of vanity, ALL is vanity sayeth the preacher. (Unsigned vote by 69.234.183.166 (talk · contribs), user's first edit)
- Delete. Let it come back when 'obvious' is at least 'massive', if not 'mamoth'. Peter Ellis 04:53, 20 July 2005 (UTC)