Jump to content

Talk:Why Should the Fire Die?

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Californian Treehugger (talk | contribs) at 21:57, 17 February 2008 (→‎GAN). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:Nickelcreeknotice

WikiProject iconAlbums Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Template:Countrybanner

Short

This article is way too short and needs more than one citation/reference for a GA rating. egde 21:15, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA

This article is not even close to being a good article. It's missing chunks of information found in other albums. Look in the recordings section of WP:GA for examples.--Wizardman 22:16, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Re-nomination

After adding several new sections, I have renominated this article for GA. --Thamusemeantfan (talk) 00:38, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GAN

Here are some comments to improve the article. Lets see what will be the decisions of GA reviewers. --BritandBeyonce (talk) 07:38, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • The article is not broad.
  • There is no production history especially the recording process.
checkY Done. --Thamusemeantfan (talk) 02:19, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • it does not speak of the general content of the album (e.g. lyrical content) or musical style.
  • Complete the infobox (with writers).
Writers? --Thamusemeantfan (talk) 06:00, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh sorry. Just forget the writer thing. --BritandBeyonce (talk) 10:37, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • A lot of professional reviews were in the infobox but the critical reception is very short for an album.
checkY Done. I lengthened it somewhat significantly, but I will have to add more later. --Thamusemeantfan (talk) 02:24, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Mention in the reception section the album’s chart performances.
checkY Done. I put it in the lead. --Thamusemeantfan (talk) 07:24, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove the “not certified” thing and unbold 1; its POV.
checkY Done. --Thamusemeantfan (talk) 01:09, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • When a single is part of the quoted material, use single quotation marks.
checkY Done. --Thamusemeantfan (talk) 00:47, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Mention what were the album’s feedbacks from critics in the lead.
checkY Done. --Thamusemeantfan (talk) 01:09, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redundant linking in the track listing area.
checkY Done. --Thamusemeantfan (talk) 00:45, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

--BritandBeyonce (talk) 07:38, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

checkY Done. --75.41.121.205 (talk) 18:44, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
checkY Done. --Thamusemeantfan (talk) 21:54, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sorry, but there are more problems here:

"popular American proverb",

checkY Done. --Thamusemeantfan (talk) 21:57, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"frequently praised",

checkY Done. --Thamusemeantfan (talk) 21:54, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"seems to be firing a shot across the bow" (is this relevant?)

checkY Done. --Thamusemeantfan (talk) 21:57, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The quotes seem to be some kind of street-speak, and are POV. --andreasegde (talk) 13:33, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]