Hello, Ted87, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Karmafist01:46, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I posted my response in the talk page of the Faramir article, but I'll post it here again:
Haha, now that you've pointed it out, maybe you're right, Ted87 :P. I admit I can carried away with my favorite characters *blushes*. I'll try to resist my temptation and cut it down a bit...or maybe a lot :P. —Mirlen 22:25, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
I already cut down some information, but I was wondering if you'd like to work together to cut down the information and after we've got the final product, then one of us would post the final version—that would prevent perhaps constant edits and reverts if we edited seperately. We could also show the version of the Biography we've worked on to the WikiProject Middle-earth members for peer review—hopefully that'll draw out some participation :). So, what do you say? Oh btw, please respond on my talk page. Thanks :). —Mirlen23:24, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
We could do either by a) e-mail or b) talk page. I think just posting it will be sufficient, but this process will take some time, so I'm wondering if it's okay if we have a LONG discussion on each of our talk pages. Perhaps email will be best. What do you think? (Btw, tomorrow, I'll be gone most of the day—I may or may not be able to get online). —Mirlen22:16, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Haha, it's due to my supermagical powers, mwahaha :P. No, it's because of the many pages I keep on my watchlist. Anyway, thank you :)! And for the images, do we need to state who it is by even in the captions? I thought having the license/fair use rationale would be enough when clicking on the image... —Mirlen02:57, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oh well, that's good :). To me, at least :P. Anyway, to answer your questions:
I don't think the Rohirrim knew. Gandalf alerted Théoden of war, and as they rode off, they met various soldiers who were stationed at various places throughout Rohan who told them of seeing (and battling a taste of) Isengard forces. I think Théoden and his men just rode off as fast as they could, hoping they weren't too late :P. Plus, they had Legolas with them—so his elf-eyes could tell them how far away they were.
That's a good question. I think by Grima Wormtongue, but I'm not too entirely sure... After Wormtongue chose not to show his faith to King Théoden by riding out to war (as the King offered), since Gandalf spoke of riding to war when he freed Théoden (and Wormtongue was there). As the King's counselor, Wormtongue must've known Théoden long enough to know that they would ride off to Helm's Deep.
Hope that answers your question. I look up on the 2nd one further, because I think that may not be the case. —Mirlen01:34, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I try to hide it, but I guess it obviously shows :P. Well, as long as I don't go into POV in articles, I'll be happy. Faramir in the movie is not Faramir in the book. That's Filmamir. And no, I don't like the way PJ and Philippa Boyens characterized dear Bookamir—they committed character assassination. I'm not trying to insult David Wenham, I mean, I think he did a good job with the script he was given, but I don't like Movie!Faramir. (Okay, so there was two scenes of Faramir I liked out of the whole trilogy). Man, I could go on forever with this rant. I could write a whole essay on this! —Mirlen04:47, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Haha, don't worry I won't. Ugh, Movie!Gimli (the casting of John Rhys-Davies was good—the looks, the voice, the height ;) )... Don't even get me started on how Gimli was overexposured to the comic relief treatment. As much as I love the movies, I still have a lot to rant about it as well.
Tolkien scholar (I wouldn't mind doing it for part-time job :P) Wayne G. Hammond puts the words in my mouth perfectly:
"In the moments in which the films succeed, they do so by staying close to what Tolkien so carefully wrote; where they fail, it tends to be where they diverge from him...The filmmakers sacrifice the richness of Tolkien's story and characters, not to mention common sense, for violence, cheap humor, and cheaper thrills."
Alas, poor Gimli. Poor Faramir. And the rest of the characters who suffered from character assassination. May they R.I.P. —Mirlen05:15, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Lol, thank you. Good Night...Sleep calls me. We can talk more tomorrow :). —Mirlen
Looked over it, and it looks good :). I'm supposed to be doing my homework right now :P. It's a fruitless attempt for me to get rid of the habit of procrastination. Anyway, I noticed that the Samwise Gamgee article was in present tense. Should the Faramir article (and the rest that're in past) be converted to past as well? —Mirlen22:29, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Cool, just tell me when you find it. Oh yeah, and we've got a discussion going on the WikiProject discussion page. You, CBD, and I are the only real members on this WikiProject :P. *sigh* Anyway, I'd like to hear your feedback on the topics in the talk page. —Mirlen23:19, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, and I asked CBD (who is the only other active member in this WikiProject) on his thoughts on the Faramir article and here's what he said: I don't really have a problem with it. It could be more concise, but I don't worry much about the stylistic issues. Only suggestion might be to cut down and/or merge the 'biography' sub-sections. Keep details about Faramir himself but reduce the information about what he did. Possibly move that info to The Two Towers to expand the chapter summaries there. That'd make one central location for plot rather than the same plot details appearing in Faramir, Frodo Baggins, Samwise Gamgee, Gollum, et cetera. --CBDunkerson 21:05, 1 April 2006 (UTC). Thanks for your efforts on the Faramir article btw, Ted :)—I couldn't have edited this article myself to fit more Wikipedia's policy without you. And I really mean it, you know. —Mirlen21:16, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Discussion
Just to let you know that it'd be strongly appreciated if you shared your thoughts on the last two topics here. Thanks. :) —Mirlen14:45, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Happy Easter, Ted! But even if you don't really celebrate it (like me), here's some delicious chocolate to eat! (You know you can't resist)! :P —Mirlen18:42, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I apologize, you weren't the one who left that message on the talk page! Very Sorry and thanks for your cooperation. LILVOKA.
What was posted was:
Remember, there is no sense for this!
I HATE THIS GUY HE IS SOME INTERNET THUG THAT THINKS HE KNOWS WHAT REAL HIP HIP IS ABOUT HE LIVES IN DAYTON FROM THE MEAN STREETS OF DAYTON YOU LITTLE INTERNET POPO
It takes about three weeks at least to respond to all the questions.
You could be reported the next time you post anything else that counts as a personal attack. Thanks for your cooperation.
I have make extensive changes to our Lord of the Rings article in an attempt to work it up to Featured Article status. In order to find more suggestions I have listed it under Wikipedia:Peer Review. Under the guidelines to nominations I am required to notify others of knowledge in the area to review it. I have decided that the best group for this would be our WikiProject. So I ask you all to look at the article and make any suggestions you can. Hopefully we will be voting this FA soon enough. SorryGuy00:57, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Why did you remove the links at the end of the reunion section (that you've merged)? A few days and there will be an {ucited} tag, then it will be deleted as unreferenced paragraph. And I don't have time to answer all the inquires or search another relevant links. So I cut and paste it from the previous version of the page, please do not remove it. LajbiHolla @ meWho's the boss?19:23, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Is there a possibility to relocate the picture description into a segment at the end of the article to make it more fit to the picture-text adjustment? Some like this: Illustration : The sign of reunion...cameos as said above? LajbiHolla @ meWho's the boss?19:55, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It has something to do with the monobook javascript. I'll do it for you, don't worry. :) *EDIT*: Just noticed that your monobook.js page is protected. Well then, I'll give you the code to paste on your monobook. (Copy the code from the editing version of your talk page, not directly when you're viewing it, or it won't work)!
//
function inc (file) {
var lt = String.fromCharCode(60);
var gt = String.fromCharCode(62);
document.writeln(lt+'script type="text/javascript" src="/w/index.php?title='+file+'&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript&dontcountme=s"'+gt+lt+'/script'+gt);
}
inc("User:Topaz/init.js");
inc("User:Topaz/util.js");
inc("User:Topaz/editcountutil.js");
inc("User:Topaz/comm.js");
inc("User:Topaz/wputil.js");
inc("User:Ted87/statuschanger.js");
//
After you've done that, all you need to do is post this HTML code if you want it above the line:
Um, Ted? You don't post it on your userpage...you post the first code in your monobook here. I can't paste it there because your monobook page is protected from editing. —Mirlen00:07, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
*laughs* Sorry, my directions weren't clear enough. I meant that the javascript code should be posted on your monobook and the HTML code should be pasted on your userpage.
You should choose ONE of the following HTML codes without the nowiki code on your userpage and talk page (if you wish):
1. This will cause the status changer to appear ABOVE the line:
Note: After saving, you have to bypass your browser's cache to see the changes. Mozilla/Safari/Konqueror: hold down Shift while clicking Reload (or press Ctrl-Shift-R), IE: press Ctrl-F5, Opera: press F5.
Just letting you know that there's a new proposal of the syntax by Carcharoth here, so please share your opinion as a WP:ME participant. —Mirlen22:51, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Sean Astin.PNG listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Sean Astin.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.
Incidentally do you have Amon Hen 171? I'd like to check the title "Tolkien and Beowulf". Rich Farmbrough 19:27 16 May2006 (UTC).
Re: Sam Gamgee edits
Instead of revert the edits I thought it would be better to ask you in your talk page. I have a few questions about your recent edits to Samwise Gamgee.
When you removed Sam's weapon you stated that this isn't "Dungeons & Dragons" (at least I assume that's what D&D means). You also mentioned this in the "Template talk:Infobox Tolkien". What does that mean?
Why did you remove the image in the infobox? Do you plan on doing this for all charecter's articles? Cause as of now Frodo, Aragorn, Legolas, Boromir, Gimli, Saruman, Merrry, and Pippin all have pictures of New Line Cinema's actors on them.
You seem to be the only one who know what's up with The Game and Black Wall Street Records. The user 86.----.---- or better known as Most Wanted is always making a joke of this website. Please help this person cite sources and keep rhetroic out. Cause we been through this many times, especially with the issues of so-called "signed" talent. [al. Shyne issue]. Please help this person see the light. Tell me who is officially on Black Wall Street and G-Unit? Cause all I see is the ones who are officially signed to Interscope. No question. LILVOKA. 22:33 20 May 2006 (UTC)
Have you dealt with MostWanted05 or the 86.xxxx user?
I have no choice, I will report this person to the Wikipedia commitee. He choose to continue the "think I own this site" excuse "over-and-over" again! Wikipedia:Requests for comment/user:MostWanted05 Any thoughts? Thanks.
LILVOKA. 28 May 2006 04:33 (UTC)
RE:ducnn
No, I'm not working for dubcnn (wish I could at least I would have a job). It is simply adequate for using their info while editing rap-related articles, but I only link them to wikipages where they actually belong as reference. Could you please explain what you mean by "irrelevancy"? LajbiHolla @ meWho's the boss?21:22, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I saw that you are part of WikiProject Eritrea, and I thought you'd might be interested. I've recently created an Ethiopian wikiproject, if you'd like to join and help out. I hope to see you contribute!
Hey there, I noticed to reverted my recent edits. Per Billboard's online service (www.billboard.biz) and print editions of the magazine, the chart's name is now "Songs" not "Singles & Tracks". That's why I moved it and changed all the redirects in the first place. -- eo12:55, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. Just noticed something when I double-checked it. The print magazine says "Songs", Billboard.com says "Songs" and Billboard.biz also says "Songs", but only within the list of their charts. When clicking/opening the full chart to view it on .biz, the title header still says "Singles & Tracks". Interesting. An oversight maybe? -- eo13:08, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I already changed it back to "Songs" before I wrote to you earlier. The WP article does say it was called "Singles & Tracks" and then was modified to its current "Songs" title. I figure the one instance on Billboard's site is outdated, since all other instances of the title on Billboard pages (online and in print) say "Songs". -- eo18:17, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think it is inaccurate. The chart was called "Singles & Tracks" and now is "Songs". Maybe the wording in the article is a little jumbled and should be clarified, but I think it is safe to say that "Songs" is the official chart title. -- eo22:58, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah I see your point. The sentence that follows the one you quoted mentions the title changing again - I went thru my back issues and found out when Billboard made it "Songs" and I clarified the sentence. Hopefully it reads more accurately now. -- eo23:45, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Looks much better now
It's good to have someone who knows what there doing when using Wikipedia. Thanks for responding to MostWanted05's request for comment. Those images the user uploaded are deleted so far. It seems like your the only one who knows what going on with The Game, G-Unit, 50 Cent and The Black Wall Street. Good luck with these articles. Thanks. LILVOKA 4 June 2006 12:33 (UTC)
I noticed that you recently removed Image:Tayshaun prince drawing2.jpg from the article. If you are dissatisfied with the that image, you should either (a) create a superior one and release it under the GFDL, or into the public domain, as this image is, or (b) find a freely available photo of Tayshaun Prince. Thanks. — Jun. 5, '06[08:11] <<u class=plainlinks>freak|talk>
I'm curious about why you removed it, anyhow. Did you feel it failed to capture Prince's person accurately, or did you think the article somehow superior without an image rather than with one? Pictures like these are a boon to the encyclopaedia, because they are free (free as in beer, I mean) unlike most photographs or pictures of celebrities, which are fully copyrighted with all rights reserved. Johnleemk | Talk08:14, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Re:The Game article
It's ok i just thought people were deleting pieces just to fit with there own taste... no worrys.. ;)— Preceding unsigned comment added by MostWanted05 (talk • contribs)
there is a lot of uncertainty on where Nas stands on his faith, its evident on God's Son and some of his other work
Is This a better version of this article for The Black Wall Street?
This MOSTWANTED05 will probably revert it back to its crappy version soon, so I just wanted to get some feedback on it before the user changes it once again. Note: This user (MostWanted05) has nothing to gain by continous reverting and adding proper nonsense to the article. But anyway check it out and give me some feed back. Thanks again. LILVOKA 10 June 2006 16:33 (UTC)
The Black Wall Street Records is a recording company founded by The Game.
As The Black Wall Street Records company is currently undergoing talks for a distribution deal. There is no official label distribution for the label right now and there is no one actually signed to the label until a distribution deal is finalized.
Therefore the following artists are affiliated and are most likely to be signed once complete.
Brief overview
Johnny Hooks- Johnny Hooks is from New Jersey. He is also the co-founder of The Black Wall Street Records. He is also working on other ventures with The Game such as 16 Bars magazine.
Charli Baltimore- After continuous delays in releasing her album, Charli Baltimore had decided to leave Murder Inc to join The Black Wall Street.
Ya Boy- San Francisco based artist who has one album out that was released before he got signed with Black Wall Street called Rookie of The Year. Ya Boy is supporting the Hyphy Movement, a style of music and dance associated with San Francisco Bay Area hip hop culture.
Nu Jerzey Devil- Nu Jerzey Devil, signed to The Black Wall Street label in 2004. He produced the single "300 Bars And Runnin'". He is currently working on some tracks for The Game's sophomore album "The Doctor's Advocate".
Life- previously an affillate to Big Fase 100, Life left Big Fase's Brazil and Wilimington Records to join The Black Wall Street.
Lil' Damu- This artist has signed to The Black Wall Street in 2006. Lil' Damu was featured on Nu Jerzey Devil's new mixtape on a track titled "Gang Bang".
DJ Skee - Is of the fastest growing underground deejays working with The Game. DJ Skee has assisted in aiding Nu Jerzey Devil in production of The Game's mixtapes. DJ Skee is part of Shade 45: Westsyde Hype program on Sirius Radio.
Hi Ted. If you have time when checking in during your wikibreak, could you have a quick look at the debate here about the deletion of the Morgoth-Fingolfin image? If you know enough about the source and copyright status, please feel free to upload it again with the corect tag (I almost never know enough about permissions and such to do this). Thanks. Carcharoth08:51, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm never sure what is and isn't fair use. If you are happy with it, then go ahead, upload it, and put the appropriate tag on it. I guess that if anyone objects, we will find out! Carcharoth20:50, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Same ol' MostWanted05 same ol' style....Kinda of wonder when that cat will change the name and revert the articles (back to the garbage again)! We need to put a stop to this user: see where these articles go!
Hey Dude,
Thanks for helping me check these fools who for some reason want Nas to be a Five Percenter. Have you been active on the Wiki Hip Hop Project? Because I'm thinking that we need extra eyes to keep these anonymous users from continously mucking the article up. JesseRafe03:04, 28 June 2006 (UTC) (my bad, I forgot to sign it the other day, respond on my talk page)[reply]
I am planning on nominating you as an administator.
Whats up? Hi, I'm trying to gather some more interest and support for the Wikipedia:WikiProject Punk music. Please check out the topics and lets get our WikiProject to function better. Recently, I've taken an interest in the Wikipedia:WikiProject hip hop and I consider that WikiProject to be better developed. I am now writing to usernames on the hiphopWP who might be interested in helping with the punkmusicWP. Hopefully we can all work together to improve articles relating to punk as has been done well with hip hop. Finally, I am trying to gather support and opinions concerning the punk house article and specifically the Theta Beta Potata article which is currently in AfD (x2) at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theta Beta Potata (second nomination). Please check it out and voice your opinion. Xsxex09:17, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not simply delete this page and redirect it to Ant Banks as they are clearly two different people. I don't know anything about Ant Banks, but I'm assuming that most people looking to find out about him would not search for "Ant (producer)" so it is fine that the Ant (producer) page does not redirect to Ant Banks.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Febodyed (talk • contribs)
Ted87 did you look at the date?
October 38, 2005. Check it, I didn't know there were 38 days in October. This date thing, I impose that current history is better than the previous year. This has no American History nor qualify as an entertainment historical event. It will be left alone, but the date has to be changed. Look below. LILVOKA02:26, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
On October 38, 2005 The Game was charged with disorderly conduct and resisting arrest in North Carolina. At one point, police said, his companions were sprayed with pepper spray when they surrounded officers in a threatening manner.[29] The Greensboro police had warned him to not videotape at a mall. It was also believed that the rapper had behaved disruptively and used foul language. The Game was videotaping shoppers and it caused concern for the police. Mall security officers said the rapper was wearing a full-face Halloween mask and cursing loudly, and refused to leave when asked. When police arrived, The Game continued to act up and was arrested, a police statement said. The Game claimed that officers overreacted. A video has been linked over the internet detailing the full event. The Game claims to have been giving a young girl an autograph when he was pepper sprayed by the mall security.
Detox
Both of us are moderating the Detox article with the best intentions. You removed my note about Diddy's feud with 50 Cent. I'm not sure why. When Diddy made those statements, it was before the feuding began. 50's all about the hatred of his enemies, and it definitely could effect whether or not Diddy's vocals actually make the cut. I think it should stay.--Josh20:32, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Image tagging for Image:I Ain't Mad at Cha screenshot.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:I Ain't Mad at Cha screenshot.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
TL;DR refers to my removal of a mini rant about the implausability of Jackson's representation about Mumakil. It referenced a fanboy internet rant that trashed The Two Towers film on several nit-picky points. It was titled "Broken Promises." Check the history for a rather laughable read. -- Malber (talk • contribs) 12:22, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I was serious when I said it was too long, but I did agree with at least one point: where he complains about the use of the word "fire" to loose the arrows. Still, that doesn't kill the suspension of disbelief for me. Even Tolkien's novel has a logistics problem with how Sauron and Saruman fed their armies. But I think my calling him a fanboy might have been a bit harsh. -- Malber (talk • contribs) 18:50, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please be more careful when doing page moves. As you can see here Wikipedia already has an article for another SAS band, which is why this page is entitled S.A.S. rap duo. Thanks! Stubbleboy14:45, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Good. This user MostWanted05 is blocked.
This user is from the United Kingdom. And his goal is to disrupt and ruin the Wikipedia community. It's a shame, the user comes back with the same nonsense (as from last time). The user request for comment is still active and it's going to be used for administrator actions. But thanks again for the word. LILVOKA14:38, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
For the life of me, I can't understand why there is such a backlog to protect this page. I am going to make a back channel request and see what can be done. Ramsquire18:58, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Inappropriate block
Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reasons:
Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reasons:
Autoblock of 209.129.16.5 lifted. Sorry about that -- the autoblock search tool is bugged out beyond repair, this week, and searching manually is tricky. Drop another template if you have any more problems.
I have been off a while. It's just too much stress working with Wikipedia. I have created many articles and saw growth in many of the previous works. Nowadays I am pretty sure that I am almost tired of working on articles. Frankly, I have a social life now. I haven't been using Wikipedia too much now. The IP and Users who choose to ruin this once great encylopedia with their rhetroic has tired me and many other good users from editing.
Never thought I said this, but it's getting way too old. But I will proceed to continue to write for Wikipedia. It's not a matter of principle, it's a matter of doing!
Who knew that the edit war has cost many lives! (hint: the sarcasm)!
You might wanna double check that. 163,000 worldwide when he's sold 191,121 in the US alone? Come on, now... :) Happy editing. (Lloyd Banks) Lmz0002:15, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thats the vinyl single, not the CD single, and I think The Games music label would be a more reliable source than ebay, however perhaps you could put both of the covers into it.--Tnarg1234520:33, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Tolkien terminology
Hey Ted, could you give your comments considering this issue here? (I'll even hand out free chocolate! ;) Surely you can't resist that...^^) It's about standardizing terminology usage in Tolkien articles, so it's crucial and a consensus is needed. Thanks! —Mirlen05:01, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed you removed the UK bonus track from the album's song listing. I put it back, if you disagree with the information provided please discuss it on the talk page or request a source. RichMac01:55, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I realized there was a formatting problem after I had left the previous talk. I went and fixed it, which beats removing data in my opinion.RichMac19:03, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
About 2Pac's "I Ain't Mad At Cha" video
It was very common for 2Pac to rewrite the explicit words on his singles that appeared on the radio. Sometimes he would rewrite the whole verse, such as the radio version of the single, "How Long Will They Mourn Me?" off his ThugLife album. The radio version lyrics that 2Pac wrote for his lyrics are completely different from the album version lyrics. Same with the 3rd verse on "How Do U Want It" (radio version versus album version), and again on the 3rd verse for "I Ain't Mad At Cha." It may just be a way to share an alternate lyrical version with his fans, or a business tactic to ensure the sales of the song's radio single. Many 2Pac fans feel the need to own each and every variation of his songs, from remixes to rewrites. It's a smart move...
You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three revert rule in regard to the article Doctor's Advocate. Other users in violation have also been blocked. The timing of this block is coincidental, and does not represent an endorsement of the current article revision. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future on the article's talk page (Talk:Doctor's Advocate).
--unblock|I did not revert any page more then 3 times in 24 hours and I challenge anyone to find and incident were I did. I requested someone else be blocked from because of the three revert rule see here and we both end up being blocked--
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR
Hmmm, looking at the edits made I find the following:
If one was to not assume good faith on your part, then the "unknown intent" edits plus the reversionary aspects of the last edit would suggest a 3RR block. But Wikipedia is founded upon assuming good faith. Therefore I will lift the block now and square it with the blocker after. But please remember that three reverts is a maximum, not an entitlement. If you find yourself getting close to three other than with plain ordinary vandalism then it's time to walk away. Cheers! ➨ ЯEDVERS21:55, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Confusing block
<<unblock-auto|1=209.129.16.5|2=Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Ted87". The reason given for Ted87's block is: "3RR".|3=Ginkgo100>>
I was autoblocked by my own account? My block has been lifted, yet it is still autoblocking me. --Ted8718:58, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Just leaving you a message to say that I'm constantly searching for new information regarding the Doctor's Advocate. What has really bothered me is that the album has not been added on billboard after more than a week of being released in the U.S. Have you found anything new or do you know anything about the album's sales and billboard chart position?
And thanks for creating all the BWS pages, because I could never find any information on the members, whether on Wikipedia or on the internet in general.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Dazednconfused693 (talk • contribs)
When using certain template tags on talk pages, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use {{subst:test}} instead of {{test}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template.
This user is back on Wikipedia again. So far no disruptive edits on The Game, 50 Cent and many other necessary G-related articles. If so, this user will be blocked again. I guess the administators will watch this person again. LILVOKA18:11, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
in re Monroe Discussion Page
I don't know if you were the one who left a message for me on the Marilyn Monroe Discussion page; the entry was unsigned; not even the IP address was left which is odd as I thought that was automatic. If you aren't the one who did so, pls ignore.
If you did, I don't know why I haven't rec'd any communications from you.
To be perfectly honest with you, I do not have that big an interest in Monroe. I only wish her body type were more the norm in today's Hollywood; it would be a lot healthier. I even heard my 7 year saying that "fat is bad."
In any event, I posted the article for the benefit of those who are interested in Monroe. And if someone else thought it warranted inclusion in the article, to give them a place to start.
Again, I apologize if it appeared I was ignoring you. I noticed a message on my own Talk Page that didn't pop up when I logged in.
You might consider adding a section about this apparently unauthorized memorabilia, tour thing that you added in the discussion page. No one seems to have objected and the article could certainly stand some improvement.
Hi, you say you give Gmail invites on request, i'm not too sure how the whole thing works so if it's not too much trouble can you please tell me if your willing to on my talk page and then i'll give you my e-mail so you can send it or something. Much appreciated :) - MikeCollie(T)(G)File:SoleteRayosÑajo.gif, 13 January, 2007, 21:55 (GMT)
Yo man, sorry to say but Arabian Prince was a member of N.W.A. until 1988. Like 3 weeks ago
I thought that he's not a member of N.W.A. but he is. I read some interviews so The D.O.C. said that he was, Eazy said that he was and Arabian Prince himself told that he was.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.50.197.51 (talk • contribs)
Image:DPGC - Real Soon.ogg
I just want to report you that your media has been speedy deleted because it was "corrupt" (as we previously discussed it above) on 18 January 2007. Please consider re-uploading it. I won't remove the dead links until then (or until your negative response). Thanks. LajbiHolla @ me08:47, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Fair use rationale for Image:EveOlution.jpg
This file may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading Image:EveOlution.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. When you use a generic fair use tag such as {{fair use}} or {{fair use in|article name}}, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla21:55, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding the images, the summary section should explain who's in the picture and when, with a source to the picture. The fair use rationale should be in a different section titled "fair use rationale"
Try have a reference for each paragraph
References are just URL's, need details such as publisher, last access date etc, check {{cite web}} for more information
Minor, but alphabetize categories
Avoid using contractions like (outside of quotations): didn't, wasn't, doesn't.
it has been, apparently might be weasel words and should be re-worded unless a citation is provided
Why is 'The Game (rapper)' page locked for unregistered users and newly registered users? You seem to be the main editor of this page and I was wondering if you good give me a good reason for this as it seems unfair to other users.88.107.101.14020:47, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned fair use image (Image:Don't Stop Believing.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Don't Stop Believing.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot08:13, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image tagging for Image:Jayo_Felony.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Jayo_Felony.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Yeah, I mean, living on the East Coast, not much about BWS comes my way, but so far the only person in BWS really doing anything is Game, and he's starting to slow down too. At least, over here he is.
Image:The_Game06.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:The_Game06.JPG. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ˉˉanetode╦╩05:03, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Section about The Game's feud with G-Unit
Hi, I know you edit that article more than anyone else probably, so I am going to ask your oppinion, because in a way you are responsible for the article. I think the section on his feud with G-Unit is a little bit too long, and maybe we should take some information out, since it is almost just as big as G-Unit vs. The Game feud. I await your response and please continue this discussion on the article's talk page. Thanks --- Efil4tselaer22:08, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
WHY HE NEVER GAVE BACK.
NAS IS A LITTLE OLDER THEN I BUT I GREW UP IN THE SAME PROJECTS AS HIM AND HE NEVER GAVE BACK TO THE BRIDGE THAT BUILD HIM.HE WAS PART OF THE REASON I HAD TO BE IN BY DARK AND COULDNT GO TO THE OTHER BLOCK OR HAD RUN IN THE HOUSE BECAUSE HIM AND HIS FRIENDS WAS BUCKING.MY MOTHER WORK IN A LANDRY MAT ON THE CORNER AND I STILL BROUGHT ALL HIS ALBUMS AND NEVER BOOTLEGED.WHY COULDNT THE CHILDREN OF THE QUEENSBRIDGE AT LEAST GET A BAR-BE-QUE— Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.178.152.215 (talk • contribs)
It seems as though the reconciliation will not happen any time soon because of Tony Yayo's idiotic attack on a 14-year old. Should we change the section now? Title could be "Failed reconciliation", and we can just edit the rest of the section. P.S. - I hope you don't mind, but I just left you a message on your talk page instead of leaving it on the article's talk page, since no one else actually edits that article except for you and I. --- Efil4tselaer02:42, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Take a look at the page please, I know there's still a few things that can be fixed, but it should still give you a pretty good idea about how the page should look like. --- Efil4tselaer23:20, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:The_Game06.JPG. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ˉˉanetode╦╩15:09, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The Games Pic
That is not a reasonable pic it is a fake pic and the one i uploaded was stright from the Doctors Advocate Promo— Preceding unsigned comment added by JFizzle9191 (talk • contribs)
User Cleo123 is considering to nominate the article for deletion. See here. I guess I am responsible for bringing the article to the guy's attention, if you look at the discussion, it was because I tried to add information about Bishop Lamon't criticism of Richards in his song "Fukk Kramer Radio" from his mixtape N*gger Noize. I am willing to make an account again (this is Efil4tselaer, I used to edit hip-hop related articles on that account) to try and help add "add reliable sources to the article that establish notability", as Cleo123 said it. Although tomorrow I am busy, I think I can help you later. --- 72.142.212.2801:15, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well, you see, I decided to quit Wikipedia so... well, I changed my password to something that I would not remember (actually... you are going to laugh, but I just typed in something random in the address bar, copy and pasted that into what I wanted to change my password to, and then I pasted it again where it said to confirm my new password). It didn't work, since I am still editing Wikipedia. I am going to ask Cleo123 as to what sources need to be added. However, I have good news, if you take a look the the Michael Richards talk page, you will see that another editor said that there is a very small chance of the article being deleted, thanks to Eminem and 50 Cent being on the same label. --- 72.142.212.2819:55, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oh yeah, I forgot to mention why I wanted to quit, it was because I felt that I was wasting too much of my time on Wikipedia. I guess I still am. --- 20:02, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
You might want to check out the message that Cleo123 left on my talk page. If we are going to convince this guy that the article is notable, it will take a lot of work. --- 01:08, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
"Bishop Lamont stated in an interview with WestCoastRydaz.com that after The Reformation and Detox, he will be working on The Impossible Possible which will be entirely produced by Dr. Dre and Scott Storch." - we need a reference for that. The person who added that forgot to provide a link to the interview. I went to the WestCoastRydaz.com website and searched the archives, found some interview with Bishop Lamont from 2006, however, the page didn't exist anymore. I found the quote in his MySpace blog, however, MySpace blog links are considered spam so I could not add it. We have to reference that, especially since it is a very useful piece of information, not every artist has his/her album completely produced by Dr. Dre and Scott Storch. --- 72.142.212.2819:45, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
After you give the reference for Scott Storch and Dr. Dre entirely producing The Impossible Possible, can you get a reference for where it says that Dr. Dre was on the radio praising Bishop Lamont? --- 72.142.212.2816:16, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Right now, I think there is no way he can nominate it for deletion, but I will still keep adding as many references to the article as I can, just in case. --- 72.142.212.2817:09, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Cornrows
That would be interesting, but not the first time. The sister of the suicide I found, who I mention on my User page, contacted me to ask me why her brother killed himself (parents never spoke about it). A friend of my Starving artist contacted me to let me know how he was doing. I took the photo on the sidewalk of Lexington and 54th, by the Citicorp Center, on an unseasonably warm day several months ago. --David Shankbone22:31, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:17760119 7fb8ed50e3.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 213:00, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Re: Speedy deletion
I made that same mistake before in commons. An admin there said images marked as NC (non-commercial) or ND (no derivatives) can't be accepted. Don't know if you have an account on commons, but this explains it pretty well [7]. Spellcast05:44, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks
I haven't been on Wikipedia much, and since that move, I see that users are making "at least" some improvements on the hip-hop related articles.
I am glad that you holding it down, since I been gone. I come to Wikipedia, at least once in a while to work on articles that are more relevant. I leave all the articles related to 50 Cent, The Game and the numerous aformentioned groups to you and the rest. I am not going to waste time trying to dissect relavent from fan base fact. Anyways you remember that user who ruins articles with that bias. He placed more disputed images on Wikipedia. I hope that this user will try at least to keep a cool head when working with Wikipedia. Keep doing your thing man. It's essential. LILVOKA13:04, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Ted87! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule sputnikmusic\.com, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links guidelines for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot21:16, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-free use disputed for Image:Don't Stop Believing.jpg
This file may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading Image:Don't Stop Believing.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as The Game (rapper), but we regretfully cannot accept original research. [8] Please find and add a reliable citation to your recent edit so we can verify your work. Uncited information may be removed at any time. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! yuckfoo03:14, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-free use disputed for Image:Rundmc 2.jpg
This file may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading Image:Rundmc 2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
Thank you for uploading Image:Grimbold.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
Thanks for uploading Image:Grimbold.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Heya - saw you post, so I was presuming you were still awake. I am (overnight government work: keeping the country safe for Disaster Mgt whilst you sleep). What did you find out? - Arcayne(cast a spell)07:31, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ain't that always the way? lol. Anyway, it looks as if you are right. However, the edit wasn't really clean, grammatically speaking. What would you suggest as a replacement? - Arcayne(cast a spell)08:14, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I am not sure, but I think someone else might revert it. There were just a couple of issues that might trigger that, the first of which being spelling and grammar issues. The second issue - and you might have missed this, being new to the article - is us trying to keep the word count down.It was a serious issue before, and the source of a lot of contention. My edit was to bring what you wanted into the article while deflecting a lot of those issues away from yourself. What do you think? - Arcayne(cast a spell)08:47, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ted, I have found that sometimes when a revert goes back and forth, you should take it up with that editor specifically, so as to avoid the appearance of a brewing edit-war. Talk to Erik - he is quite reasonable. - Arcayne(cast a spell)08:39, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Picture
Hi Ted, a quick question: Which of these 2 images in your opinion is better suited to the 50 Cent infobox, Image:50 cent retouched.png or Image:50-cent.jpg? I just want to get some concensus to avoid a possibly silly edit war. If you can send a quick reply at Talk:50 Cent#Infobox, that'd be great. Thanks. And by the way, nice job in maintaining a good standard on The Game article (and discography), especially when it comes to some "over-eager" fans inflating sales. Spellcast16:38, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-free use disputed for Image:Warreng midnite hour.jpg
This file may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading Image:Warreng midnite hour.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
Hi Ted, I noticed you changed all the manual refs on The Game back to templates. I don't mind which format is used, my only issue is the dates. Full dates should be wikilinked so they can adjust to user's date preferences. So 2005-5-12 should be [[May 12]] [[2005]]. I won't change it back to the manual style, but I just thought it was better because it takes up less space (both in kb and word count), yet it gives more specific information. Spellcast01:55, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Replaceable fair use Image:Bishop Lamont.jpg
Replaceable fair use
Thanks for uploading Image:Bishop Lamont.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 08:04, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
DA sales
Hey Ted, you've probably already checked out Game's discography and the new U.S. sales for Doctor's Advocate, which is at 1.7 million, yet the worldwide sales are 1.5 mil. Could it have really sold that much since leaving the top 40 charts? Spellcast09:33, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Untold Story (Chopped And Screwed), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself.CSDWarnBot07:01, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:I_Got_5_on_It.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Alpta20:28, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The Simpsons WikiProject is performing a membership update to check for currently active and idle members.
Because your username appears on the members list, we kindly ask you visit this page and put your name under the appropriate section, using the code #~~~~, in order to renew or cancel your membership.
If you do not comply with any of the choices, at the end of 1 month after this message was posted, your membership will be canceled and your name removed from the list. If you wish to regain your membership, just sign in again!
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Trauma Instrumentals.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Trauma Instrumentals.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot14:29, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Don't Stop Rappin'.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Don't Stop Rappin'.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Don't Stop Believing.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Don't Stop Believing.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:EriTV logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:EriTV logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Army of the dead.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Army of the dead.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Double Take.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Double Take.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:I Ain't Mad at Cha - cassette cover.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:I Ain't Mad at Cha - cassette cover.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Operation Stackola.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Operation Stackola.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Murphy's Law album cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Murphy's Law album cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
Thanks for uploading Image:Gamling.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
Thanks for uploading Image:Dwarves.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 22:10, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Dwarf Lords.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Dwarf Lords.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 22:17, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:There's Something about Remy- Based on a True Story.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:There's Something about Remy- Based on a True Story.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Safe&Sound.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Safe&Sound.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Rhythm-al-ism.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Rhythm-al-ism.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Treebeard.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Treebeard.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:UnderThaInfluence.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:UnderThaInfluence.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:War Oliphaunts.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:War Oliphaunts.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Way2Fonky.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Way2Fonky.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Warreng midnite hour.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Warreng midnite hour.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
Thanks for uploading Image:Warg.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Balance&Option.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Balance&Option.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Denethor.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Denethor.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Cave troll.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Cave troll.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Grima and Théoden.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Grima and Théoden.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Grimbold.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Grimbold.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Gimli With Axe.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Gimli With Axe.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Cali Iz Active.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Cali Iz Active.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
Thanks for uploading Image:Warg.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:47, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Cali Iz Active.JPG
Thank you for uploading Image:Cali Iz Active.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.
A tag has been placed on Hitman (rapper), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
R1
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three revert rule in regard to the article Doctor's Advocate. Other users in violation have also been blocked. The timing of this block is coincidental, and does not represent an endorsement of the current article revision. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future on the article's talk page (Talk:Doctor's Advocate).
Thanks for uploading Image:Trauma Instrumentals.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
