Jump to content

User talk:Feydey

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Merbabu (talk | contribs) at 15:48, 7 April 2008 (→‎"References" vs. "Further reading": please address specifically). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Comment

Welcome User, please state your comments after the others. -- Feydey.

Click to leave me a new message

Sign your comments by adding four tildes (~~~~). Messages left on this page will usually lead me to reply on your talk page; however, I may use both for extended discussions. Questions?


Help me on the newsletters, please.

Hello, feydey, umm, I amd Michael and I just joined the Novels WikiProject (YAY!) and... also joined to be a newsletter editor... But, I really need help... So, can you help me? Michael Houang (talk) 01:03, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For one thing: do I post my replies here or at my talk page? Michael Houang (talk) 02:11, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here would be nice. feydey (talk) 02:12, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question

You cut the domestic and foreign gross from the Bourne Supremacy entry. Why? I don't care, particularly, but I'm curious what your thought was. Twins Too! (talk) 01:53, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Film DYK

Thanks for the heads up, nice suggestion about new article Pina Pellicer, at Portal talk:Film/Did you know. I have added it to the hooks for Portal:Film. Cirt (talk) 20:57, 1 January 2008 (UTC).[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mclachlan-live.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mclachlan-live.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:11, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Knopfler-Local hero.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Knopfler-Local hero.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:31, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Iceland's portal peer review

Hello Feydey. Since you've been a recent portal peer reviewer, I request your input at the Iceland Portal's peer review. All general feedback is greatly appreciated. Thanks! [sd] 13:49, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again! I would like notify you that the Iceland Portal has now been nominated for featured status. Comments and suggestions are welcome at the discussion. Thank you, [sd] 02:03, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XX - January 2008

The January 2008 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by KevinalewisBot -- 13:25, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, could you clarify your position on adding YouTube links for music videos to the articles? I was under the impression that linking to YouTube violates Wikipedia policy, and I would like to know if I am wrong on this point. MelicansMatkin (talk) 05:19, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Per Wikipedia:EL:
Linking to YouTube, Google Video, and similar sites
There is no blanket ban on linking to these sites as long as the links abide by the guidelines on this page (which would be infrequent). See also Wikipedia:Copyrights for the prohibition on linking to pages that violate intellectual property rights.
Best, feydey (talk) 05:25, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks very much for that clarification, :) MelicansMatkin (talk) 05:49, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
How do you know the Youtube videos you link to do not violate copyright? CloudNine (talk) 11:36, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
All the Youtube links that I added are from one user:
Universal Music Group (UMG) Music Video Channel.
Universal Music Group consists of record labels Decca Music Group, Deutsche Grammophon, Interscope Geffen A&M Records, Geffen Records, Island Def Jam Music Group, Lost Highway Records, MCA Nashville, Mercury Nashville, Mercury Records, Philips, Polydor Records, Universal Music Latino, Universal Motown Records Group, Universal South Records and Verve Music Group as well as a multitude of record labels owned or distributed by its record company subsidiaries around the world.
I assume them them to be the copyright holders who are releasing the music videos on YouTube. feydey (talk) 17:07, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Also I'm pretty sure that Youtube would have not allowed the user to upload 4505 videos if it were not a legitimate copyright owner. :) Best, feydey (talk) 17:11, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

sorry

I was testing that you may delete it if you wish.--Lbrun12415 06:35, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

paul thomas anderson image

Hello. Yeah, I got the picture off of Yahoo! Movies and I was just trying to put the picure up on his article. However, I was unaware of the copyright licenses that needed to be in place. It is not picture and I was just trying to contribute without actually knowing what I was doing. I tried to delete from my account but couldn't find a way to do it. I realize the importance of the licensing however I was not aware of the proper procedures. I really don't care about adding the image to his profile I just thought I could do somethint to enhacne the website. If it must be deleted, I totally understand, with either you, someone, or myself doing it. I hope this did not cause any inconveniences. Your help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.

kufirst

You may delete the Anderson image if it is necessary. I'd rather not have it be a hassle. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kufirst (talkcontribs) 08:45, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Novels Collaboration

You supported Rabbit, Run, which has been selected as the Novels WikiProject's new Collaboration of the Month. Please help improve this article towards featured article standard. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 16:07, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am leaving a friendly notice to invite you to participate at a requested move from 'Football in the Republic of Ireland' to 'Association football in the Republic of Ireland', due to your participation in a previous requested move. Hope to see you there! EJF (talk) 21:18, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XXI - February 2008

The February 2008 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by KevinalewisBot --11:10, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Wild Geese, Ogai Mori.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Wild Geese, Ogai Mori.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:09, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Annie Lennox - Diva.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Annie Lennox - Diva.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:32, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Beth Orton - Trailer Park.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Beth Orton - Trailer Park.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:40, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bruce Springsteen - Atlantic city.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bruce Springsteen - Atlantic city.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:07, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Frankie and Johnny poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Frankie and Johnny poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:55, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:The Apprentice (US) contestants has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Jappalang (talk) 01:54, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Like yourself, I can't understand the addition of this template. This subject is far from being uncontroversial or supported by consensus. ShahidTalk2me 22:37, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Errr, huh? (2008 != 2009)

Could you check this change? Thing is, the page is Talk:2008 but the referenced RfD mentions 2009? (I'm so confused...) Shenme (talk) 06:30, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Did you maybe do this change to talk pages for both articles by mistake? Shenme (talk) 06:34, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Novels Newsletter contribution

Just wondered if you might have some input for the newsletter this month - the time seems to come round quickly. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 12:28, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Newsletter March 2008

Added some stuff. Best, feydey (talk) 17:48, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XXII - March 2008

The March 2008 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by KevinalewisBot -- 16:37, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Happy First Edit Day, Feydey, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day!

--RyRy5 talk 01:29, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Happy First Edit Day, Feydey, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! ~~~~

--Nadir D Steinmetz 11:36, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. You are receiveing this message because your name appears on the WikiProject Council participants list. The WikiProject Council is currently having a roll-call; if you are still interested in participating in the inter-project discussion forum that WT:COUNCIL has become, or you are interested in continuing to develop and maintain the WikiProject Guide or Directory, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Participants and remove the asterisk (*) from your name on the list of participants. If you are no longer interested in the Council, you need take no action: your name will be removed from the participants list on April 30 2008.

MelonBot (STOP!) 22:16, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Customer Complaint

Where I can put my complaint against a specific mother dairy booth.

Ajay Singh 9810678083 ajaysingheil@yahoo.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.159.221.36 (talk) 10:07, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You supported A Farewell to Arms, which has been selected as the Novels WikiProject's new Collaboration of the Month. Please help improve this article towards featured article standard. Cheers. Liveste (talkedits) 01:28, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much.

Hello Feydey. Thank you very much for posting the photo I created on the Lisa Gerrard pages. And, thanks for your help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sonya the photographer (talkcontribs) 01:19, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"References" vs. "Further reading"

Please do not add new sources into an article under the title References or Bibliography. Take, this article for example. This makes readers think that the articles source was actually Nathaniel's Nutmeg - which is of course, not the full picture. Perhaps some of the info in the article could be found in the book, but that doesn't mean that all the info is there. It would be better to use a "Further reading" section if you want to add texts after the fact. Even better, would be to put inline cites to Nathaniels Nutmeg to specific parts of the article text. Any questions, please let me know. thanks --Merbabu (talk) 14:44, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comment. feydey (talk) 15:18, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You've added new sources under the headings "references" and "bibliography". This would suggest they were used to write the article, but this is not the case. I would be better to put them as inline citations for the exact piece of info. Ie, what part of East Timor article was the "Dunn" reference used for? --Merbabu (talk) 15:38, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Could you please be more specific and explain the relevance of WP:CITE to my specific concerns above?