Talk:George Adamski

"His work is now generally considered to be a load of old cobblers."

- Does this really belong in an encyclopedia article? Even if it's a simple statement of fact about how his work is viewed, shouldn't it be a bit more dispassionate - "Relatively few people view his work as credible" or somesuch?

• I would say - "like all who have claimed contact with those from other planets, Adamski has had to suffer much criticism from those who have not had the same experiences"

- Agreed. That person clearly has a biased slant and a negative intent towards the person. Adamski is famous in his own field and there is in fact, almost 40 years after his death, a great deal of active disinformation and counterintelligence concerning nearly every aspect of his life. I will leave it up to the reader to figure out why this would be so. Suffice to say the only true, factual information comes from original paper books on the topic, not countless copy/pastes from dubious websites. The George Adamski Foundation is the best place to field any questions and provide factual information.

The George Adamski Foundation is ONE place to find information. But so are others. Incidentally, it would help if you signed your comments. Moriori 10:03, August 11, 2005 (UTC)

Incorrect. The only legitimate, accurate source of Information about Adamski is the George Adamski Foundation. Again, there is a TREMENDOUS amount of active disinformation and counterintelligence about Adamski. Sorry I don't know about Signatures but that does not negate the logic and truth of what I have to say. Read any of Adamski's books then compare it with the disinformation websites you see online..it becomes totally clear that some people are paid to spread disinformation about him. Remember..money and power are the most addictive things on this planet and those that wield them will behave as any addict would..do whatever it takes..to keep their 'drug' and get more. Period.