User talk:SpecialWindler

Subpages

If I left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, then place {{Talkback|SpecialWindler}} on your talk.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by when more than 2 sections are present.

Please leave a new message.

Tomorrow Never Dies move

Emperor001 moved Tomorrow Never Dies to Tomorrow Never Dies (film) "Making this article consistent with all of the other Bond films"! Emperor001 moved The World Is Not Enough too Ultra! 19:57, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review for Adelaide Rams

Hi,

Would you be able to copyedit/peer review Adelaide Rams.

I have significantly improved the status of the article over the past few days and would like to get it to Good Article status.

It would be greatly appreciated if you would do this. Thanks. The Windler talk 06:53, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Windler - I've taken a quick peek at the article and would be happy to give it a good run-through. It looks interesting. I'll warn you that I'm not great with wikitables, so I will work on the assumption they are properly formatted and the information is correct. I figure it will take me a couple of hours to do a review and thorough copy edit; I'll put any questions onto the talk page of the article. I am tied up for the next few nights (darn this real life!), so won't get to it until Friday evening or Saturday morning Eastern (North American) time - is that acceptable to you? Risker (talk) 18:24, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah that's fine. May I suggest for the review/questions part that you place them on the Peer review page, as to better organise the reviews. But if you'd prefer the talk page, its fine by me. Also, I am more worried about the prose text than the tables, so thats fine too. The Windler talk 23:13, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, the peer review page it is. Risker (talk) 23:15, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Windler - I wanted to let you know that I have (finally) completed the copy edit and peer review of this article. My sincere apologies for the delay; I won't make any excuses except to say I bit off more than I could chew. Feel free to let me know if you have any questions about my edits or my comments. Risker (talk) 04:56, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, it was greatly appreciated. I hope to do some work on it and hope to get to GA level soon. Thanks again. The Windler talk 04:59, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

		The Rugby League Barnstar
		You have been awarded this barnstar in recognition of your contributions to the work of WikiProject Rugby League. Many thanks for doing the hard slog for me on the Wests Tigers history section! And for the great kit graphics!

•Florrie•leave a note• 12:52, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bond characters

Whats the deal with the overly complicated template?? The way its marked now makes it look as if only some of them are films and some of them are novels. It is a navigation template intended for quick navigation not to assert that novels and films are of equal importance. I just cannot see the thinking behind marking a one of the lists by novel when actually there cover both film and novel characters. Your version of the tmeplate is completely redundant. E.g henchmen in diamonds ar eforver is marked as henchman in a novel so you click that page expecting to see discussion of the novel and what to you see??? A list of henchmen and their images form the films. Look I agree that the films are given too much elevation above the novels but the way you;ve adapted this template doesn't make sense. Why not just a list of bond charcters instead of adding all the fussy novel/film boundaries which aren't right anyway? ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ ^$1,000,000? 12:40, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]