Jump to content

User talk:Veggies

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Wikiality123 (talk | contribs) at 06:30, 6 May 2008 (Images for deletion: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome to my talk page! I will reply here to all your comments, so please keep an eye on this page as I will probably not notify you. Please remember to sign your posts!

"Hatez meh teh troophers"

Just a quick reminder here: It's conducive to a collaborative project to maintain civility at all times and assume good faith within reason, including with people we disagree with. Please keep this in mind in your future contributions. Thank you. ~ S0CO(talk|contribs) 05:59, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Right, right. I just hate 9/11 Truthers. Not for being Truthers, but for completely ignoring all facts that contradict them as Government Propaganda... -- VegitaU (talk)

First class

If first class is rows 1-5 it looks like there are 7 fatalities and 4 with serious injuries, assuming that the assigned seats were the seats used. WhisperToMe (talk) 20:41, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Wait, that's strange.. I didn't notice there was a separate "lounge" - Perhaps it was a three class aircraft and it calls the actual first class lounge. But even so the NTSB said that it could not establish a relationship between documented seat map and survival in the crash, so I would have to say "one person who was documented as being in first class survived." WhisperToMe (talk) 21:00, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

a little help please?

This edit and previous edits to the same page: I've messed up my reference, and can't quickly spot what I did incorrectly. I have to dash off, a friend has an emergency and I have to leave immediately. Would you please look over my edit and fix it if you have time, please? User:Pedant (talk) 18:12, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It might be strange for me to ask you for help, but I know you are familiar with the material and can do it. User:Pedant (talk) 18:16, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nice Layout

How would I go about obtaining a layout like the one on your user page? Any input would be greatly appreciated. ProtektYaNeck (talk) 17:15, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just click 'Edit this page' on my user page and copy the code. Paste it onto your own page and change whatever you need to change. That's what I did originally. I took the code from User:Jimbo Wales. User:Thx2005 has a similar layout. -- VegitaU (talk) 21:29, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. This should help greatly. ProtektYaNeck (talk) 21:40, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Moving

I'm still in favor of moving - I got sidetracked with other stuff, I guess ... WhisperToMe (talk) 00:31, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

9/11 - Tachyonbursts

Don't worry too much about Tachyonbursts. I suspect he will self destruct in the coming days, and we can get back to trying to build a nominateable article. =) --Tarage (talk) 23:37, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I've put in a complaint at WP:AN/I. I guess we'll see what happens. -- VegitaU (talk) 23:39, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tachyonbursts

Goading like this[1] isn't really necessary or helpful. He's on a topic ban and I'm watching him. Raymond Arritt (talk) 01:23, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So you've just seen his two edits on the 9/11 article? How exactly is topic banning enforceable then? -- VegitaU (talk) 01:25, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for bringing those edits to my attention. But it's not necessary to twist the knife. It would be unfortunate if even more editors were to come under editing restrictions. Raymond Arritt (talk) 01:31, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive Edits

Why don't you contact me with a civil inquiry before you accuse me of 'disruptive edits'?

If perhaps you paused to examine the nature of my edits, you'll notice that I was trying to rectify the discrepancies in various 9/11 related pages. United Airlines Flight 93 has a total of 45 in its 'Others' section and a total of 44 in its 'Summary'. United Airlines Flight 175's 'Summary' lists 56 passengers, but its 'Nationalities' section lists 47. September 11, 2001 attacks lists 64 fatalites (including hijackers) for Flight 175. So if you've set yourself up as a policman for these pages, why don't you rectify these discrepancies yourself? If I wanted to vandalize anything, I'd go to a PC cafe with an anonymous IP. Davidabram (talk) 23:36, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies. I was wrong. -- VegitaU (talk)

Images for deletion

Hi VegitaU! Noticed that you left a few messages on the images from Google Earth as nominated for deletion. Google Earth gives licence to use the images as long as the attributions including the Google logo attribution are preserved. I have recently used a image from Google Earth in one of my publications for a Springer's journal and it has been accepted. The reviewers there had visited the copyrights of these images and have reconfirmed that they are copyright free. If need be I can email you the uncorrected proof (it is not online yet) as I would like to maintain anonymity on Wikipedia. Let me know if you still think that there is a copyright violation. Cheers Wiki San Roze †αLҝ 06:30, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]