Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2008 May 10

< May 9	Deletion review archives: 2008 May	May 11 >

10 May 2008

GLScene

At at least one point in time, this article was English: http://web.archive.org/web/20060913000000/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GLScene It shouldn't have been deleted; it should have been reverted to this earlier version. DanielPharos (talk) 15:56, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

draugiem.lv

the most popular site of a European country merits inclusion on it's own right, I think. (a while ago I left a comment on the repeatedly deleted article's talk page with links to alexa rankings etc., but it's purged again) Lysis rationale (talk) 05:55, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Endorse, since you haven't provided any reason to restore the old article content, and the AfD was closed just fine. However, I suggest you work on a draft in your userspace (at, say User:Lysis rationale/Draugiem.lv) and make sure that the article doesn't still fail the policies cited at the AfD, then put it back into mainspace. Or, since the most recent deletion was over a year ago, you might want to try just writting a better version in mainspace itself. Cheers. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 15:15, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Destrachan

Hello! :) In March, Destrachan was nominated for deletion. At the time, there was no suitable page for this article to be redirected to, so based on the consensus, Secret deleted the article. I have created a new page, List of Dungeons & Dragons 3.0 edition monsters, which which would be a proper destination to merge and/or redirect the article to. I'm wondering if it's possible to restore the original article, and turn it into a redirect, thus preserving the edit history? I have brought this up to Secret, but the user seems to be mostly inactive. BOZ (talk) 03:07, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

History merge. I've gone ahead and created the redirect. If there's any useful content, it can be merged over after the history is restored. Cheers, BOZ. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 15:20, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]