Jump to content

Drucker–Prager yield criterion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 131.203.165.140 (talk) at 04:37, 20 May 2008 (Anisotropic Drucker-Prager yield criterion). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The Drucker-Prager yield criterion [1] is a pressure-dependent model for determining whether a material has failed or undergone plastic yielding. The criterion was introduced to deal with the plastic deformation of soils. It and its many variants which have been applied to rock, concrete, polymers, foams, and other pressure-dependent materials.

The Drucker-Prager yield criterion has the form

where is the first invariant of the Cauchy stress and is the second invariant of the deviatoric part of the Cauchy stress. The constants are determined from experiments.

In terms of the equivalent stress (or von Mises stress) and the hydrostatic (or mean) stress, the Drucker-Prager criterion can be expressed as

where is the equivalent stress, is the hydrostatic stress, and are material constants.

The Drucker-Prager yield surface is a smooth version of the Mohr-Coulomb yield surface.

Expressions for A and B

The Drucker-Prager model can be written in terms of the principal stresses as

If is the yield stress in uniaxial tension, the Drucker-Prager criterion implies

If is the yield stress in uniaxial compression, the Drucker-Prager criterion implies

Solving these two equations gives

Uniaxial asymmetry ratio

Different uniaxial yield stresses in tension and in compression are predicted by the Drucker-Prager model. The uniaxial asymmetry ratio for the Drucker-Prager model is

Drucker-Prager model for polymers

The Drucker-Prager model has been used to model polymers such as polyoxymethylene and polypropylene[2][3]. For polyoxymethylene the yield stress is a linear function of the pressure. However, polypropylene shows a quadratic pressure-dependence of the yield stress.

Drucker-Prager model for foams

For foams, the GAZT model [4] uses

where is a critical stress for failure in tension or compression, is the density of the foam, and is the density of the base material.

Extensions of the isotropic Drucker-Prager model

The Drucker-Prager criterion can also be expressed in the alternative form

Deshpande-Fleck yield criterion

The Deshpande-Fleck yield criterion[5] for foams has the form given in above equation. The parameters for the Deshpande-Fleck criterion are

where is a parameter[6] that determines the shape of the yield surface, and is the yield stress in tension or compression.

Anisotropic Drucker-Prager yield criterion

An anisotropic form of the Drucker-Prager yield criterion is the Liu-Huang-Stout yield criterion [7]. This yield criterion is an extension of the generalized Hill yield criterion and has the form

The coefficients are

where

and are the uniaxial yield stresses in compression in the three principal directions of anisotropy, are the uniaxial yield stresses in tension, and are the yield stresses in pure shear.

The Drucker yield criterion

The Drucker-Prager criterion should not be confused with the earlier Drucker criterion which is independent of the pressure (). The Drucker yield criterion has the form

where is the second invariant of the deviatoric stress, is the third invariant of the deviatoric stress, is a constant that lies between -7/2 and 9/4 (for the yield surface to be convex),

References

  1. ^ Drucker, D. C. and Prager, W. (1952). Soild mechanics and plastic analysis for limit design. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 157-165.
  2. ^ Reference needed.
  3. ^ Abrate, S. (2008). Criteria for yielding or failure of cellular materials. Journal of Sandwich Structures and Materials, vol. 10. pp. 5-51.
  4. ^ Gibson, L.J., Ashby, M.F., Zhang, J. and Triantafilliou, T.C. (1989). Failure surfaces for cellular materials under multi-axial loads. I. Modeling. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 635–665.
  5. ^ V. S. Deshpande, and Fleck, N. A. (2001). Multi-axial yield behaviour of polymer foams. Acta Materialia, vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 1859–1866.
  6. ^ where is the quantity used by Deshpande-Fleck
  7. ^ Liu, C., Huang, Y., and Stout, M. G. (1997). On the asymmetric yield surface of plastically orthotropic materials: A phenomenological study. Acta Materialia, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 2397-2406