User talk:KelleyCook

"Monkier"

Said "KelleyCook":

"Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:IEEE 802.11n. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism."

Jeez, just trying to help. Or did you intend the subject heading to read "monkier" and not "moniker"? 24.6.66.193 (talk) 01:25, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Full-motion video merge

Why did you merge Full motion video with an article about full-motion video games? The two are indeed related in some cases, but in most they are completely different topics. The full-motion video article also covered the use of FMV in non FMV-centric games, which makes no sense given the new title. Green451 (talk) 17:11, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

About the iPhone issue

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to IPhone.

I never did that. Check the history of the page. I removed a very small bit. I didn't add noting at all. So please, before weighting in a question you don't understand, do your research. Thanks. Femmina (talk) 19:02, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Yes, "do your research", would be a good credo for you to follow. -- KelleyCook (talk) 20:10, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Femmina RfC

Hello. I have finally gotten around to starting the RFC on Femmina's conduct. Your name is listed as one of the people who tried to resolve the dispute with him, so you need to sign this section within 48 hours (named Users certifying the basis for this dispute) for the RfC to proceed in earnest. Thanks. Groink (talk) 01:59, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Wi-Fi Article

Hi. I fully support your actions on the Wi-Fi talk page. User CleanUpX has admitted being Spookee and a string of anonymous IPs, and is now attempting to out an unrelated editor who is blocked from wikipedia. Maybe a block is now in order. I have removed the outing from the talk page. He has also tried to link these editors to pageneno, and I wouldn't be suprised if he is actually some of the people he is arguing with, and also the user Randomized that "owns" the Electrical sensitivity page. --61.152.188.244 (talk) 07:51, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

FireWire

(Caution: Addition of unsourced material without proper citations on FireWire.) [KelleyCook]
-- I sourced the edit. It is readily verifiable and confirmed through Google.
-- Reference [1]

DigitalJE5U5 (talk) 13:25, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

History of iPhone

Please explain why you think this is irrelevant and NPOV. Many in the privacy sphere think this is pretty astounding, that US CURRENCY is not allowed to be used for a purchase. I think it is an extremely relevant point of interest for this secondary iPhone page. Not too mention, I am simply stating fact - not some rumor. IF you would like me to add additional references to this fact I will do so.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.197.70.15 (talk) 19:49, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

You still have not given any reasons for your constant removal of facts from this article. Apple not accepting US currency is a fact, and its pretty neutral - Apple has acknowledged and defended their practice, and its in accordance with federal law. I don't know why you are so agitated by this addition. This article is the best place for this fact, since the main iPhone article does not mention price whatsoever. This isn't the KelleyCook encyclopedia, anyone is allowed to make changed that are sourced, accurate and neutral. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.197.70.15 (talk) 14:23, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on History of the iPhone. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.

NOTHOWTO removals on XP-SP3

I think you're not being consistent in your XP SP3 not-how-to removals. In particular, it's strange that you allow the "Microsoft Dynamics Retail Management System" note to remain while you remove other notes. See the XP discussion page for more information about this comment. Thanks. --TedPavlic | talk 20:17, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Responded at Talk:Windows XP -- KelleyCook (talk) 21:20, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Cracking program references to iPhone will be added, no matter what you want

Hi. I saw you reverted my edit to the iPhone page about the cracking product ZiPhone. ZiPhone is of course by far the way easiest method to crack the iPhone. I have no affiliation with this product at all, except from using it to crack my brand-new iPhone in about 4 minutes (which is the time the product uses to crack it - it takes about one second to find the button named "Do it all!"). You said "revert link to single product". Well, how do you want it? I can add links to multiple products, I can make a sole page of such products (as with List of Wii modchips) with a link to it from the iPhone page, or whatever you want - Just give me some acceptable-for-you. But do NOT try to come in the way of freedom of information - I suspect you're an Apple-employee trying to hinder such information to be available, and if this is the case, I will make sure it is noticed far and wide. Damn - such editing like you did here pisses me so extremely off: it is so obvious that there is some second agenda WAY besides serving the world's information needs. Stolsvik (talk) 11:31, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Sometimes the best response is to say nothing at all. -- KelleyCook (talk) 13:31, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Why?

I would like to ask why you took away my iTunes screen shot. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mczack26 (talk • contribs) 21:13, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Simply because the infobox was not designed for two screenshots and was breaking the layout. I personally do not care which one is up there. Feel free to switch them, though that might irritate someone else, or integrate it into the article or put it on iTunes version history which doesn't have any pictures at all. -- KelleyCook (talk) 00:25, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Convert and the 9.2 inch Howitzer

Hi KelleyCook, I reverted your edits to the Artillery article where you tried to fix the link broken by Lightmouse's script. The last two edits to the article before yours were vandalism, I think, so I was going to revert yours as well as the vandalism first and then put your fix back in (note; you left an extra inch there). However, I don't think the name of this weapon was the right place for a conversion so I removed the convert template call altogether. My edit summary says I was reverting the two vandal edits and one good faith edit - yet I got just your edit. Twinkle got the best of me there. Your edit was the good faith one. Just wanted to clear that up. Bleakcomb (talk) 04:25, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

No offense taken, but thanks for the update. -- KelleyCook (talk) 02:44, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Please remove Pinouts.ru link spam

Seems that the pinouts.ru website has link-spammed 89 Wikipedia pages.

A quick investigation shows that this site was started in 2004 replicating the content of historical sites such as HardwareBook and Technick.net (now moved to AllPinous.org). But the worse thing is that some pinouts.ru pages are replicating the Wikipedia content, violating the GNU Free Documentation License (i.e.:. http://pinouts.ru/Slots/apple_adb_pinout.shtml). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.203.190.226 (talk) 11:30, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

FairPlay

Hi, I found this edit of yours: [2]. When you find an error, why don't you fix it instead of just deleting everything? Don't you think that deleting information others have entered is kind of bad? Paluv (talk) 12:22, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Reply at User talk:Paluv. -- KelleyCook (talk) 14:57, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi, thank you very much for your reply. It would be great if you could add the information yourself, as you suggested. Finding a reference at a regular webserver is difficult, though, as the creator is afraid of repercussions by Apple and so he made his website a freenet host (so the url doesn't start with http, and you need a special program to see it. URL is: [freenet:USK@GSQgFDoeQUG0cSkbUVYYkB-ssqEEavRdo-RDVEAm0jk,rVvV3LjSZq3UNdGJrrup~~ZBPq4ohBhJeKkREXDLULw,AQACAAE/requiem/-1/]). The program really exists, and works, though - I've tried it out. The only other link I have found is at "the pirate bay", and I'm not sure whether we can make links to that place, as there is a lot of illegal software distribution going on there (URL: [3]). Thanks for your help. Paluv (talk) 17:35, 22 May 2008 (UTC)