Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Federal Vampire and Zombie Agency

Federal Vampire and Zombie Agency

Fails WP:N. Google search shows several ghits, [1] but no significant coverage in secondary and third party reliable source. It has only a mention in USA Today, but that is not multiple reliable source and not significant coverage. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 04:31, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Appears to fail WP:N. Passing reference insufficient. Edison (talk) 04:57, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. Normally, I'd propose a redirect to the material that uses the term, but I can't really discern what that is. Unfortunately, I think it's best to simply delete it. Celarnor ^{Talk to me} 05:52, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I think this is basically web content which should be judged per WP:WEB; the agency seems to have been created for the self-titled web site, not for a book or movie or other media. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 13:55, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sources sufficient to assert Notability. --Firefly322 (talk) 08:27, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete per Celarnor Carter | Talk to me 11:52, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Somebody's web site for a fictional government agency WP:MADEUP in one day. Not even remotely notable. KleenupKrew (talk) 00:19, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as notable and verifiable subject. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 01:44, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 16:20, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]