User talk:Jack/ABs
 | This page was nominated for deletion on 2008-03-03. The result of the discussion was Keep/nomination withdrawn. |
Rules
This has got alot bigger than I ever expected it to get, so big someone had to nominate it for deletion! Because of this, I have to make a few rules to keep it equal etc:
1. Try and keep your name on 1 line. This could be done by not using the spaces in your name etc.;
2. Don't put any notes after such as "please sign" or "hard to find", it stops the equality!;
3. Keep your name in the same form as everyone else's. This means not making your username bold or a different colour.
4. The first 10 names in the list are not to be changed, anyone adding their name in the first 10 shall have their name moved further down the list. The decission of which users are in the top 10 is up to Jack.
Thanks, I'll update if I think of anything else! Jack?! 21:20, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
- Sounds good. I've actually been watching the page, and maintaining it myself whenever people mess up and stuff. - DiligentTerrier and friends 15:26, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for that, but I didn't really understand your edit to it recently.. Jack?! 19:56, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- I suggest alphabetical order; it's quite disorganized. · AndonicO Engage. 16:37, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for that, but I didn't really understand your edit to it recently.. Jack?! 19:56, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
I think it needs to be shown where the next person puts it. Not alphabetical order because then no-one knows who's new. Chubbennaitor 18:11, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
- I have been keeping it updated as well. I think these rules are good. On a non related note there are many people that havn't acctually got this list on the sign pages but they have added their name to the list. Maybe say if you do not have the list on your page then your name will be removed from the list? ·Add§hore· Talk/Cont 08:36, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- Everyone who is on that list and who was not added by themselves was added by me. I am thinking of removing some of them, especially the completely inactive users. It is not in alphabetical order on purpose, as Chubbennaitor said earlier, because it is more chronological than alphabetical, as I believe it is better this way. Jack?! 23:53, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- Besides, you nominated this page for deletion didn't you? Jack?! 23:54, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- Everyone who is on that list and who was not added by themselves was added by me. I am thinking of removing some of them, especially the completely inactive users. It is not in alphabetical order on purpose, as Chubbennaitor said earlier, because it is more chronological than alphabetical, as I believe it is better this way. Jack?! 23:53, 27 May 2008 (UTC)